一起分开吃:素食和吃肉的学生如何在弹性素食时代管理共栖性

E. Veen, H. Dagevos, Y. Michielsen, A. de Vrieze, Selke E. Riedel
{"title":"一起分开吃:素食和吃肉的学生如何在弹性素食时代管理共栖性","authors":"E. Veen, H. Dagevos, Y. Michielsen, A. de Vrieze, Selke E. Riedel","doi":"10.1332/yqfo9787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We are living in a flexitarian age, in which reduced meat eating and vegetarianism are normalising, while simultaneously meat eating is still the norm in Dutch society. A resulting individualisation of diets begs the question whether and how omnivores and veg*ns living together maintain commensality. Based on interviews with 119 young people living in shared households – made up of both veg*ns and omnivores – we investigate how these young adults shape and manage their shared meals. Our results show that veg*ns and meat eaters maintain commensality by, first, using a number of practical strategies that result in meals that are suitable to those different diets, and, second, creating a new norm that defines the diet as an individual choice so as to manage potential conflicts around clashing norms. This results in an active upkeep of tolerance in which veg*nism, meat eating and associated ethical-moral considerations are not discussed. The acceptance of (specifically) vegetarianism, the limited social tensions between meat lovers, meat reducers and meat avoiders, and our finding that people find ways to eat – apart – together, hints at optimism for the future.","PeriodicalId":443072,"journal":{"name":"Consumption and Society","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eating apart together: how vegetarian and meat eating students manage commensality in a flexitarian age\",\"authors\":\"E. Veen, H. Dagevos, Y. Michielsen, A. de Vrieze, Selke E. Riedel\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/yqfo9787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We are living in a flexitarian age, in which reduced meat eating and vegetarianism are normalising, while simultaneously meat eating is still the norm in Dutch society. A resulting individualisation of diets begs the question whether and how omnivores and veg*ns living together maintain commensality. Based on interviews with 119 young people living in shared households – made up of both veg*ns and omnivores – we investigate how these young adults shape and manage their shared meals. Our results show that veg*ns and meat eaters maintain commensality by, first, using a number of practical strategies that result in meals that are suitable to those different diets, and, second, creating a new norm that defines the diet as an individual choice so as to manage potential conflicts around clashing norms. This results in an active upkeep of tolerance in which veg*nism, meat eating and associated ethical-moral considerations are not discussed. The acceptance of (specifically) vegetarianism, the limited social tensions between meat lovers, meat reducers and meat avoiders, and our finding that people find ways to eat – apart – together, hints at optimism for the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Consumption and Society\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Consumption and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/yqfo9787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumption and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/yqfo9787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们生活在一个灵活的时代,在这个时代,减少吃肉和素食主义正在正常化,同时吃肉仍然是荷兰社会的常态。由此产生的饮食个性化回避了杂食动物和素食主义者是否以及如何保持共生关系的问题。我们采访了119位生活在共同家庭中的年轻人——既有素食者,也有杂食者——调查了这些年轻人如何塑造和管理他们的共同膳食。我们的研究结果表明,素食者和肉食者通过以下方式保持共通性:首先,使用一些实用的策略来产生适合不同饮食习惯的膳食;其次,创建一种新的规范,将饮食定义为个人选择,从而管理规范冲突带来的潜在冲突。这导致了一种积极的宽容,素食主义、吃肉和相关的伦理道德考虑不会被讨论。人们对素食主义的接受(特别是),爱吃肉的人、少吃肉的人和不吃肉的人之间有限的社会紧张关系,以及我们的发现,人们找到了分开吃和一起吃的方法,这些都暗示着对未来的乐观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eating apart together: how vegetarian and meat eating students manage commensality in a flexitarian age
We are living in a flexitarian age, in which reduced meat eating and vegetarianism are normalising, while simultaneously meat eating is still the norm in Dutch society. A resulting individualisation of diets begs the question whether and how omnivores and veg*ns living together maintain commensality. Based on interviews with 119 young people living in shared households – made up of both veg*ns and omnivores – we investigate how these young adults shape and manage their shared meals. Our results show that veg*ns and meat eaters maintain commensality by, first, using a number of practical strategies that result in meals that are suitable to those different diets, and, second, creating a new norm that defines the diet as an individual choice so as to manage potential conflicts around clashing norms. This results in an active upkeep of tolerance in which veg*nism, meat eating and associated ethical-moral considerations are not discussed. The acceptance of (specifically) vegetarianism, the limited social tensions between meat lovers, meat reducers and meat avoiders, and our finding that people find ways to eat – apart – together, hints at optimism for the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信