敢于说出真相,从优秀的希腊公民,到尼采的相对主义和福柯的自我关怀

Sophía Pub Date : 2022-07-13 DOI:10.17163/soph.n33.2022.07
César Augusto Ramírez-Giraldo, Rubén Darío Palacio-Mesa
{"title":"敢于说出真相,从优秀的希腊公民,到尼采的相对主义和福柯的自我关怀","authors":"César Augusto Ramírez-Giraldo, Rubén Darío Palacio-Mesa","doi":"10.17163/soph.n33.2022.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout humanities’ history, telling the truth has always been seen or for that matter understood, as a challenge, as a defiance of the status quo or what is established or known, and could very easily be torn down by an announced truth at any given moment. That is the main reason a speaker, in most cases, will avoid expressing their interpretation of what is real and true, and will prefer to intentionally alter it with convenient and accommodating lies that will not result in any type of discomfort for the people around them. This text presents a general overview of three very important and crucial moments in history, in which daring to tell the truth came to be the very philosophical foundation and gave some specific characters in history the importance and relevance they have been given today. First, it covers a brief review of the ancient Greek term Parrhesia, its relation to other relevant philosophical terms and its importance within the different philosophy schools of the era. Later, the process of how truth is started to be manipulated from a Christian stance and later the proposal of relativity from Friedrich Nietzsche. Finally, there will be a reflection about Michael Foucault’s proposal that relates parrhesia to the care of the self. As a conclusion, an open discussion focusing on the recent post-truth issues illustrating the mechanics involved since ancient times in regard to telling the truth","PeriodicalId":236657,"journal":{"name":"Sophía","volume":"293 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atreverse a decir la verdad desde el buen ciudadano griego, al relativismo de Nietzsche y el cuidado de sí en Foucault\",\"authors\":\"César Augusto Ramírez-Giraldo, Rubén Darío Palacio-Mesa\",\"doi\":\"10.17163/soph.n33.2022.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Throughout humanities’ history, telling the truth has always been seen or for that matter understood, as a challenge, as a defiance of the status quo or what is established or known, and could very easily be torn down by an announced truth at any given moment. That is the main reason a speaker, in most cases, will avoid expressing their interpretation of what is real and true, and will prefer to intentionally alter it with convenient and accommodating lies that will not result in any type of discomfort for the people around them. This text presents a general overview of three very important and crucial moments in history, in which daring to tell the truth came to be the very philosophical foundation and gave some specific characters in history the importance and relevance they have been given today. First, it covers a brief review of the ancient Greek term Parrhesia, its relation to other relevant philosophical terms and its importance within the different philosophy schools of the era. Later, the process of how truth is started to be manipulated from a Christian stance and later the proposal of relativity from Friedrich Nietzsche. Finally, there will be a reflection about Michael Foucault’s proposal that relates parrhesia to the care of the self. As a conclusion, an open discussion focusing on the recent post-truth issues illustrating the mechanics involved since ancient times in regard to telling the truth\",\"PeriodicalId\":236657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sophía\",\"volume\":\"293 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sophía\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n33.2022.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sophía","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17163/soph.n33.2022.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在整个人文学科的历史中,讲真话一直被视为一种挑战,被视为对现状或既定或已知事物的蔑视,在任何给定的时刻都很容易被宣布的真理所摧毁。这就是演讲者在大多数情况下会避免表达他们对真实和真实的解释的主要原因,而宁愿故意用方便和适应的谎言来改变它,而不会给周围的人带来任何不适。本文概述了历史上三个非常重要和关键的时刻,在这些时刻,敢于讲真话成为了非常重要的哲学基础,并赋予了历史上一些特定人物今天所赋予的重要性和相关性。首先,它简要回顾了古希腊术语“直言”,它与其他相关哲学术语的关系,以及它在当时不同哲学流派中的重要性。后来,从基督教的立场开始操纵真理的过程,后来是弗里德里希·尼采提出的相对论。最后,我们将对迈克尔·福柯的提议进行反思,将直言与自我关怀联系起来。作为结论,一个公开的讨论集中在最近的后真相问题,说明自古以来涉及的机制,讲真话
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Atreverse a decir la verdad desde el buen ciudadano griego, al relativismo de Nietzsche y el cuidado de sí en Foucault
Throughout humanities’ history, telling the truth has always been seen or for that matter understood, as a challenge, as a defiance of the status quo or what is established or known, and could very easily be torn down by an announced truth at any given moment. That is the main reason a speaker, in most cases, will avoid expressing their interpretation of what is real and true, and will prefer to intentionally alter it with convenient and accommodating lies that will not result in any type of discomfort for the people around them. This text presents a general overview of three very important and crucial moments in history, in which daring to tell the truth came to be the very philosophical foundation and gave some specific characters in history the importance and relevance they have been given today. First, it covers a brief review of the ancient Greek term Parrhesia, its relation to other relevant philosophical terms and its importance within the different philosophy schools of the era. Later, the process of how truth is started to be manipulated from a Christian stance and later the proposal of relativity from Friedrich Nietzsche. Finally, there will be a reflection about Michael Foucault’s proposal that relates parrhesia to the care of the self. As a conclusion, an open discussion focusing on the recent post-truth issues illustrating the mechanics involved since ancient times in regard to telling the truth
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信