估计未来全球能源供应的成本

Patrick A. Narbel, J. Hansen
{"title":"估计未来全球能源供应的成本","authors":"Patrick A. Narbel, J. Hansen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2180493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study produces an attempt to estimate the cost of future global energy supplies. The approach chosen to address this concern relies on a comparative static exercise of estimating the cost of three energy scenarios representing different energy futures. The first scenario, the business as usual scenario, predicts the future energy-mix based on the energy plans held by major countries. The second scenario is the renewable energy scenario, where as much of the primary energy supply as possible is replaced by renewable energy by 2050. The cost of the renewable energy generating technologies and their theoretical potential are taken into account in order to create a plausible scenario. The third scenario, the nuclear case, is based on the use of nuclear and renewable energy to replace fossil-fuels by 2050. Endogenous learning rates for each technology are modeled using an innovative approach where learning rates are diminishing overtime. It results from the analysis that going fully renewable would cost between −0.4 and 1.5% of the global cumulated GDP over the period 2009–2050 compared to a business as usual strategy. An extensive use of nuclear power can greatly reduce this gap in costs.","PeriodicalId":277238,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Energy (Sustainability) eJournal","volume":"294 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the Cost of Future Global Energy Supply\",\"authors\":\"Patrick A. Narbel, J. Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2180493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study produces an attempt to estimate the cost of future global energy supplies. The approach chosen to address this concern relies on a comparative static exercise of estimating the cost of three energy scenarios representing different energy futures. The first scenario, the business as usual scenario, predicts the future energy-mix based on the energy plans held by major countries. The second scenario is the renewable energy scenario, where as much of the primary energy supply as possible is replaced by renewable energy by 2050. The cost of the renewable energy generating technologies and their theoretical potential are taken into account in order to create a plausible scenario. The third scenario, the nuclear case, is based on the use of nuclear and renewable energy to replace fossil-fuels by 2050. Endogenous learning rates for each technology are modeled using an innovative approach where learning rates are diminishing overtime. It results from the analysis that going fully renewable would cost between −0.4 and 1.5% of the global cumulated GDP over the period 2009–2050 compared to a business as usual strategy. An extensive use of nuclear power can greatly reduce this gap in costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuclear Energy (Sustainability) eJournal\",\"volume\":\"294 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuclear Energy (Sustainability) eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2180493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Energy (Sustainability) eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2180493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

这项研究试图估算未来全球能源供应的成本。为解决这一问题而选择的方法依赖于对代表不同能源未来的三种能源情景的成本进行比较静态估算。第一种情况,即一切照旧的情况,根据主要国家的能源计划预测未来的能源结构。第二种情景是可再生能源情景,到2050年,尽可能多的初级能源供应被可再生能源取代。考虑到可再生能源发电技术的成本及其理论潜力,以创建一个合理的方案。第三种情况,即核能情况,是基于到2050年使用核能和可再生能源取代化石燃料。每种技术的内生学习率使用一种创新方法建模,其中学习率随着时间的推移而减少。分析结果表明,与一切照旧的策略相比,在2009年至2050年期间,完全采用可再生能源的成本将占全球累计GDP的- 0.4至1.5%。广泛使用核能可以大大减少这种成本差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating the Cost of Future Global Energy Supply
This study produces an attempt to estimate the cost of future global energy supplies. The approach chosen to address this concern relies on a comparative static exercise of estimating the cost of three energy scenarios representing different energy futures. The first scenario, the business as usual scenario, predicts the future energy-mix based on the energy plans held by major countries. The second scenario is the renewable energy scenario, where as much of the primary energy supply as possible is replaced by renewable energy by 2050. The cost of the renewable energy generating technologies and their theoretical potential are taken into account in order to create a plausible scenario. The third scenario, the nuclear case, is based on the use of nuclear and renewable energy to replace fossil-fuels by 2050. Endogenous learning rates for each technology are modeled using an innovative approach where learning rates are diminishing overtime. It results from the analysis that going fully renewable would cost between −0.4 and 1.5% of the global cumulated GDP over the period 2009–2050 compared to a business as usual strategy. An extensive use of nuclear power can greatly reduce this gap in costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信