Logos i Ethos Pub Date : 2020-04-30 DOI:10.15633/lie.3577
K. Wieczorek
{"title":"Orszak wdzięcznych marionetek, czyli maszyna jako urzekający potwór","authors":"K. Wieczorek","doi":"10.15633/lie.3577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author of the article asks questions about the limits of human–machine relations. He draws attention to the fact that while at the time of the dominance of the idea of mechanism, there was a conviction that there was a sharp, inviolable border between the mechanism (which also included biological organisms, including the human body) and the mind, which is an attribute of soul-endowed beings, this border is blurred. On the one hand, we observe the process of “machine humanization,” associated with various practices creating the transhumanism trend, and on the other hand, the symmetrical (though not entirely) process of “embodying the mind,” which can also be figuratively described as “humanizing the machine.” The intensively developing current of research and experiments aiming at the emergence of ever more perfect forms of artificial intelligence must sooner or later come across another border: the autonomy and subjectivity of objects equipped with intelligence. Without asking about the technical side of this process, the author reflects on its reflection and repercussions in philosophy as well as in public awareness. He reflects on criteria that will make it possible to see when this moment occurs, and on the future of relations between man and the machine world in a situation where the machine will become an equal partner of man in intellectual life.","PeriodicalId":353688,"journal":{"name":"Logos i Ethos","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos i Ethos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15633/lie.3577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的作者对人机关系的极限提出了疑问。他提请注意这样一个事实:虽然在机械论占主导地位的时候,人们相信在机械论(也包括生物有机体,包括人体)和精神之间存在着一条清晰而不可侵犯的边界,而精神是赋予灵魂的生物的一种属性,但这条边界是模糊的。一方面,我们观察到“机器人性化”的过程,与创造超人类主义趋势的各种实践相关联;另一方面,我们观察到“思想具体化”的对称(尽管不是完全)过程,也可以形象地描述为“机器人性化”。以出现更完美的人工智能形式为目标的密集发展的研究和实验潮流迟早会跨越另一个边界:具有智能的物体的自主性和主观性。作者没有询问这一过程的技术方面,而是思考了它在哲学和公众意识方面的反思和影响。他思考了一些标准,这些标准将使我们有可能看到这一时刻何时发生,以及在机器将成为人类智力生活中平等伙伴的情况下,人类与机器世界之间关系的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orszak wdzięcznych marionetek, czyli maszyna jako urzekający potwór
The author of the article asks questions about the limits of human–machine relations. He draws attention to the fact that while at the time of the dominance of the idea of mechanism, there was a conviction that there was a sharp, inviolable border between the mechanism (which also included biological organisms, including the human body) and the mind, which is an attribute of soul-endowed beings, this border is blurred. On the one hand, we observe the process of “machine humanization,” associated with various practices creating the transhumanism trend, and on the other hand, the symmetrical (though not entirely) process of “embodying the mind,” which can also be figuratively described as “humanizing the machine.” The intensively developing current of research and experiments aiming at the emergence of ever more perfect forms of artificial intelligence must sooner or later come across another border: the autonomy and subjectivity of objects equipped with intelligence. Without asking about the technical side of this process, the author reflects on its reflection and repercussions in philosophy as well as in public awareness. He reflects on criteria that will make it possible to see when this moment occurs, and on the future of relations between man and the machine world in a situation where the machine will become an equal partner of man in intellectual life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信