印尼IPO可比企业估值方法的企业乘数识别

Andrew Handaya, D. Warganegara, D. S. Warganegara
{"title":"印尼IPO可比企业估值方法的企业乘数识别","authors":"Andrew Handaya, D. Warganegara, D. S. Warganegara","doi":"10.21512/jafa.v1i2.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to find the relevant valuation measurement, firm multiplier, which is utilized by issuers or underwriters during IPO. This research uses companies that conducted IPO, in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), within year 2001 to 2007, as the research sample. The hypotheses are developed to find the relevant valuation multiplier. The data are analyzed using One-Sample T Test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) Test, and Binomial Test.  The empirical results suggest that there are similarities and differences in valuation results when comparable firm valuation is utilizing different firm multiplier. Among the five methods, i.e. arithmetic mean, median, harmonic mean, closest ROA, and closest TA, the closest TA method performs the worst in Indonesia capital market during 2001-2007. There is no statistical difference between selecting arithmetic mean, median, and harmonic mean methods. The closest ROA method outperforms the arithmetic mean and closest TA methods; however it has similar performance to median and harmonic mean methods.","PeriodicalId":151258,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Finance & Accounting","volume":"257 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Firm Multiplier of Comparable Firm Valuation Method on Indonesian IPO\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Handaya, D. Warganegara, D. S. Warganegara\",\"doi\":\"10.21512/jafa.v1i2.128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this research is to find the relevant valuation measurement, firm multiplier, which is utilized by issuers or underwriters during IPO. This research uses companies that conducted IPO, in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), within year 2001 to 2007, as the research sample. The hypotheses are developed to find the relevant valuation multiplier. The data are analyzed using One-Sample T Test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) Test, and Binomial Test.  The empirical results suggest that there are similarities and differences in valuation results when comparable firm valuation is utilizing different firm multiplier. Among the five methods, i.e. arithmetic mean, median, harmonic mean, closest ROA, and closest TA, the closest TA method performs the worst in Indonesia capital market during 2001-2007. There is no statistical difference between selecting arithmetic mean, median, and harmonic mean methods. The closest ROA method outperforms the arithmetic mean and closest TA methods; however it has similar performance to median and harmonic mean methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Finance & Accounting\",\"volume\":\"257 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Finance & Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21512/jafa.v1i2.128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Finance & Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21512/jafa.v1i2.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是寻找发行人或承销商在IPO过程中所使用的相关估值计量——企业乘数。本研究以2001年至2007年间在印尼证券交易所(IDX)进行IPO的公司为研究样本。提出假设以找到相关的估值乘数。采用单样本T检验、K-S检验和二项检验对数据进行分析。实证结果表明,采用不同企业乘数对可比企业进行估值时,估值结果存在相似性和差异性。在算术平均数、中位数、调和平均数、最接近ROA和最接近TA五种方法中,2001-2007年印度尼西亚资本市场表现最差的是最接近TA方法。选择算术平均、中位数和调和平均方法之间没有统计学差异。最接近ROA方法优于算术平均值和最接近TA方法;然而,它与中值法和调和均值法具有相似的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of Firm Multiplier of Comparable Firm Valuation Method on Indonesian IPO
The aim of this research is to find the relevant valuation measurement, firm multiplier, which is utilized by issuers or underwriters during IPO. This research uses companies that conducted IPO, in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), within year 2001 to 2007, as the research sample. The hypotheses are developed to find the relevant valuation multiplier. The data are analyzed using One-Sample T Test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) Test, and Binomial Test.  The empirical results suggest that there are similarities and differences in valuation results when comparable firm valuation is utilizing different firm multiplier. Among the five methods, i.e. arithmetic mean, median, harmonic mean, closest ROA, and closest TA, the closest TA method performs the worst in Indonesia capital market during 2001-2007. There is no statistical difference between selecting arithmetic mean, median, and harmonic mean methods. The closest ROA method outperforms the arithmetic mean and closest TA methods; however it has similar performance to median and harmonic mean methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信