信息流策略vs恶意软件

Radoniaina Andriatsimandefitra, Thomas Saliou
{"title":"信息流策略vs恶意软件","authors":"Radoniaina Andriatsimandefitra, Thomas Saliou","doi":"10.1109/ISIAS.2013.6947747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Application markets offer more than 700'000 applications: music, movies, games or small tools. It appears more and more difficult to propose an automatic and systematic method to analyse all of these applications. Google Bouncer [1] tries to keep malicious applications out of Google Play by analysing uploaded applications to find known malware and malicious behaviours. However, Google Bouncer suffers from the same drawbacks of usual scan methods: it is inefficient to detect unknown malicious behaviour and it may be costly. In this paper we propose another method to efficiently detect malicious actions of applications. Our proposal consists in a new scheme of submitting applications to market place and installing applications on the device. More precisely, applications are uploaded with a companion information flow policy. A companion policy exactly describes where data used by the application can flow. The policies are studied for acceptance by reviewers. Accepted policies are certified by the market and are made publicly available. When a user acquires an application, he has to retrieve the certified version of its companion flow policy. The companion policy of the application is composed with the current flow policy enforced in the system. The application is then monitored and each time the monitor detects an information flow not allowed in the composed flow policy it raises an alert or blocks the information flow. This way, only applications respecting an official policy accepted by the market can efficiently run.","PeriodicalId":370107,"journal":{"name":"2013 9th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information flow policies vs malware\",\"authors\":\"Radoniaina Andriatsimandefitra, Thomas Saliou\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISIAS.2013.6947747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Application markets offer more than 700'000 applications: music, movies, games or small tools. It appears more and more difficult to propose an automatic and systematic method to analyse all of these applications. Google Bouncer [1] tries to keep malicious applications out of Google Play by analysing uploaded applications to find known malware and malicious behaviours. However, Google Bouncer suffers from the same drawbacks of usual scan methods: it is inefficient to detect unknown malicious behaviour and it may be costly. In this paper we propose another method to efficiently detect malicious actions of applications. Our proposal consists in a new scheme of submitting applications to market place and installing applications on the device. More precisely, applications are uploaded with a companion information flow policy. A companion policy exactly describes where data used by the application can flow. The policies are studied for acceptance by reviewers. Accepted policies are certified by the market and are made publicly available. When a user acquires an application, he has to retrieve the certified version of its companion flow policy. The companion policy of the application is composed with the current flow policy enforced in the system. The application is then monitored and each time the monitor detects an information flow not allowed in the composed flow policy it raises an alert or blocks the information flow. This way, only applications respecting an official policy accepted by the market can efficiently run.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 9th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 9th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIAS.2013.6947747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 9th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIAS.2013.6947747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

应用程序市场提供超过70万种应用程序:音乐,电影,游戏或小工具。提出一种自动的、系统的方法来分析所有这些应用变得越来越困难。Google Bouncer[1]试图通过分析上传的应用程序来发现已知的恶意软件和恶意行为,从而将恶意应用程序排除在Google Play之外。然而,Google Bouncer与通常的扫描方法有着同样的缺点:检测未知的恶意行为效率低下,而且成本可能很高。本文提出了一种有效检测应用程序恶意行为的方法。我们的建议包括向市场提交应用程序并在设备上安装应用程序的新方案。更准确地说,应用程序是与同伴信息流策略一起上传的。配套策略准确地描述了应用程序使用的数据可以流向何处。研究这些策略以供审稿人接受。被接受的政策是由市场认证的,并且是公开的。当用户获取应用程序时,他必须检索其配套流策略的认证版本。应用程序的伴随策略与系统中执行的当前流策略组成。然后监视应用程序,每当监视器检测到组合流策略中不允许的信息流时,它都会发出警报或阻塞信息流。这样,只有遵守市场接受的官方政策的应用程序才能有效运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information flow policies vs malware
Application markets offer more than 700'000 applications: music, movies, games or small tools. It appears more and more difficult to propose an automatic and systematic method to analyse all of these applications. Google Bouncer [1] tries to keep malicious applications out of Google Play by analysing uploaded applications to find known malware and malicious behaviours. However, Google Bouncer suffers from the same drawbacks of usual scan methods: it is inefficient to detect unknown malicious behaviour and it may be costly. In this paper we propose another method to efficiently detect malicious actions of applications. Our proposal consists in a new scheme of submitting applications to market place and installing applications on the device. More precisely, applications are uploaded with a companion information flow policy. A companion policy exactly describes where data used by the application can flow. The policies are studied for acceptance by reviewers. Accepted policies are certified by the market and are made publicly available. When a user acquires an application, he has to retrieve the certified version of its companion flow policy. The companion policy of the application is composed with the current flow policy enforced in the system. The application is then monitored and each time the monitor detects an information flow not allowed in the composed flow policy it raises an alert or blocks the information flow. This way, only applications respecting an official policy accepted by the market can efficiently run.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信