社会媒体、会计信息网络和市场反应:企业对投资者、利益相关者对投资者和投资者对投资者Twitter网络的影响

Gregory D. Saxton
{"title":"社会媒体、会计信息网络和市场反应:企业对投资者、利益相关者对投资者和投资者对投资者Twitter网络的影响","authors":"Gregory D. Saxton","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3277184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread adoption of social media has engendered notable changes in who is involved in the production, dissemination, and reformulation of market-relevant information. Building on this idea, this study posits that different types of accounting information networks feature different types of actors who produce and disseminate different types of information and thus have different market effects. This study specifically conceptualizes three types of Twitter-based accounting information networks – firm-to-investor networks, stakeholder-to-investor networks, and investor-to-investor networks – and tests for the direct and interactive effects these networks have on abnormal returns around SEC Form 8-K filing events. The results confirm the broad proposition that the three online information networks play distinct roles in the market for information. In an era of social media-driven “truthiness,” “clickbait,” “information silos,” “firestorms,” and “fake news,” it is important to better understand how different types of online information communities are influencing the capital markets; this study helps propel research further in this direction.","PeriodicalId":153103,"journal":{"name":"CommRN: Other Applied Communication (Topic)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Media, Accounting Information Networks, and Market Reaction: The Effects of Firm-to-Investor, Stakeholder-to-Investor, and Investor-to-Investor Twitter Networks\",\"authors\":\"Gregory D. Saxton\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3277184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The widespread adoption of social media has engendered notable changes in who is involved in the production, dissemination, and reformulation of market-relevant information. Building on this idea, this study posits that different types of accounting information networks feature different types of actors who produce and disseminate different types of information and thus have different market effects. This study specifically conceptualizes three types of Twitter-based accounting information networks – firm-to-investor networks, stakeholder-to-investor networks, and investor-to-investor networks – and tests for the direct and interactive effects these networks have on abnormal returns around SEC Form 8-K filing events. The results confirm the broad proposition that the three online information networks play distinct roles in the market for information. In an era of social media-driven “truthiness,” “clickbait,” “information silos,” “firestorms,” and “fake news,” it is important to better understand how different types of online information communities are influencing the capital markets; this study helps propel research further in this direction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CommRN: Other Applied Communication (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CommRN: Other Applied Communication (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3277184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CommRN: Other Applied Communication (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3277184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

社交媒体的广泛采用,使参与生产、传播和重新制定市场相关信息的人员发生了显著变化。在此基础上,本研究假设不同类型的会计信息网络具有不同类型的行动者,这些行动者生产和传播不同类型的信息,从而产生不同的市场效应。本研究特别概念化了三种基于twitter的会计信息网络——公司-投资者网络、利益相关者-投资者网络和投资者-投资者网络——并测试了这些网络对美国证券交易委员会8-K表格提交事件周围异常回报的直接和互动影响。研究结果证实了三个在线信息网络在信息市场中扮演不同角色的广泛命题。在一个由社交媒体驱动的“真实性”、“标题党”、“信息孤岛”、“火灾风暴”和“假新闻”的时代,更好地了解不同类型的在线信息社区如何影响资本市场是很重要的;这项研究有助于推动这一方向的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Media, Accounting Information Networks, and Market Reaction: The Effects of Firm-to-Investor, Stakeholder-to-Investor, and Investor-to-Investor Twitter Networks
The widespread adoption of social media has engendered notable changes in who is involved in the production, dissemination, and reformulation of market-relevant information. Building on this idea, this study posits that different types of accounting information networks feature different types of actors who produce and disseminate different types of information and thus have different market effects. This study specifically conceptualizes three types of Twitter-based accounting information networks – firm-to-investor networks, stakeholder-to-investor networks, and investor-to-investor networks – and tests for the direct and interactive effects these networks have on abnormal returns around SEC Form 8-K filing events. The results confirm the broad proposition that the three online information networks play distinct roles in the market for information. In an era of social media-driven “truthiness,” “clickbait,” “information silos,” “firestorms,” and “fake news,” it is important to better understand how different types of online information communities are influencing the capital markets; this study helps propel research further in this direction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信