{"title":"15. 违法行为","authors":"E. MacDonald, R. Atkins, J. Krebs","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198752844.003.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the illegality of contracts. Contracts which may fall within the scope of the restraint of trade doctrine are considered, including the Court of Appeal’s approach in Proactive Sports Management Ltd v Rooney. The chapter also looks at other reasons why a contract may be declared illegal or void at common law, such as grounds of public policy. Policy factors and the illegality defence are explored in light of recent case law and the Law Commission Final Report ‘The Illegality Defence’. Useful case law illustrations demonstrate how the courts have dealt with the issues surrounding illegality in a range of contexts, such as contracts to commit an unlawful act, contracts promoting sexual immorality, contracts prejudicial to the interests of the state, contracts prejudicial to the administration of justice and contracts promoting corruption in public life. The consequences and effects of impropriety and illegality are also looked at. The landmark case of Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, and its impact on the law, is also explored in this chapter.","PeriodicalId":214244,"journal":{"name":"Koffman & Macdonald's Law of Contract","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"15. Illegality\",\"authors\":\"E. MacDonald, R. Atkins, J. Krebs\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/he/9780198752844.003.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter explores the illegality of contracts. Contracts which may fall within the scope of the restraint of trade doctrine are considered, including the Court of Appeal’s approach in Proactive Sports Management Ltd v Rooney. The chapter also looks at other reasons why a contract may be declared illegal or void at common law, such as grounds of public policy. Policy factors and the illegality defence are explored in light of recent case law and the Law Commission Final Report ‘The Illegality Defence’. Useful case law illustrations demonstrate how the courts have dealt with the issues surrounding illegality in a range of contexts, such as contracts to commit an unlawful act, contracts promoting sexual immorality, contracts prejudicial to the interests of the state, contracts prejudicial to the administration of justice and contracts promoting corruption in public life. The consequences and effects of impropriety and illegality are also looked at. The landmark case of Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, and its impact on the law, is also explored in this chapter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Koffman & Macdonald's Law of Contract\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Koffman & Macdonald's Law of Contract\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198752844.003.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koffman & Macdonald's Law of Contract","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198752844.003.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本章探讨合同的非法性。可能属于贸易限制原则范围的合同被考虑在内,包括上诉法院在积极体育管理有限公司诉鲁尼案中的做法。本章还探讨了合同在普通法上被宣布为非法或无效的其他原因,例如公共政策的理由。本文结合最新的判例法和律政司最后报告《违法性辩护》,探讨政策因素和违法性辩护。有用的判例说明了法院如何在一系列情况下处理与非法行为有关的问题,例如实施非法行为的合同,促进性不道德的合同,损害国家利益的合同,不利于司法管理的合同以及促进公共生活中的腐败的合同。不当行为和违法行为的后果和影响也被审视。本章还探讨了具有里程碑意义的Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42案及其对法律的影响。
This chapter explores the illegality of contracts. Contracts which may fall within the scope of the restraint of trade doctrine are considered, including the Court of Appeal’s approach in Proactive Sports Management Ltd v Rooney. The chapter also looks at other reasons why a contract may be declared illegal or void at common law, such as grounds of public policy. Policy factors and the illegality defence are explored in light of recent case law and the Law Commission Final Report ‘The Illegality Defence’. Useful case law illustrations demonstrate how the courts have dealt with the issues surrounding illegality in a range of contexts, such as contracts to commit an unlawful act, contracts promoting sexual immorality, contracts prejudicial to the interests of the state, contracts prejudicial to the administration of justice and contracts promoting corruption in public life. The consequences and effects of impropriety and illegality are also looked at. The landmark case of Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42, and its impact on the law, is also explored in this chapter.