{"title":"监视与控制:对《监视资本主义时代》的批判性回顾","authors":"Jan Zygmuntowski","doi":"10.3224/ijar.v18i1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surveillance capitalism has taken popular imagination by storm, and the scholarly world quickly followed. It is the nom du jour if one attempts to briefly describe the current regime of datafication for profit, and the power-hungry technology companies which increasingly dominate markets and societies. It serves as the intellectual backbone of Netflix’s The Social Dilemma, and that one necessary critical reference in articles across disciplines. But having read Shoshanna Zuboff’s “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism”, I suspect the concept has taken a life of its own, reinterpreted, expanded beyond Zuboff’s account of behavioural manipulation industry. It is a sign of a great oeuvre and a dazzling artist, but much less of critical accuracy. A long-time student of managers and firms, Zuboff adopts a functionalist, positivist lens to portray the rise of a new mode of accumulation. Her narrative draws heavily from the companies’ own accounts, dozens of interviews with data scientists and other accessible materials on business development. With a far from apologetic stance, the Harvard Business School professor openly admits the failings of neoliberal dogma and draws from intellectual traditions of heterodox schools. Hayek, Friedman and Jensen receive no mercy when Zuboff unpacks their political economy as in fact stripping people of agency and subduing them to the market. Instead, the book is rich with Polanyi’s “fictitious commodities” and “double movement”, Marx-inspired “behavioral surplus” and Harvey’s “accumulation by dispossession”. Big Tech’s “coup from above” (p. 463) is one of the book’s excellent metaphors, clearly pointing to the stakes of the conflict en large: the loss of human sovereignty, a precondition for collective action and social order. Zuboff warns of this danger to democracy and free will, and the alarm has since rung true, be it in the case of algorithmically amplified genocide in Myanmar, or people unable to take sound decisions thanks to COVID-19 vaccine disinformation. The book reads essentially as a manifesto of uncertainty-as-liberty, human unpredictability and possibility of other futures, although a viable proposal of the better future is missing from this picture. “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism” employs Arendt’s ideas on free will to battle the impossible vision of perfect information and full rationality, now powering the fanaticism of fully automated smart contracts.","PeriodicalId":416587,"journal":{"name":"IJAR – International Journal of Action Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surveil and Control: A critical review of “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism”\",\"authors\":\"Jan Zygmuntowski\",\"doi\":\"10.3224/ijar.v18i1.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surveillance capitalism has taken popular imagination by storm, and the scholarly world quickly followed. It is the nom du jour if one attempts to briefly describe the current regime of datafication for profit, and the power-hungry technology companies which increasingly dominate markets and societies. It serves as the intellectual backbone of Netflix’s The Social Dilemma, and that one necessary critical reference in articles across disciplines. But having read Shoshanna Zuboff’s “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism”, I suspect the concept has taken a life of its own, reinterpreted, expanded beyond Zuboff’s account of behavioural manipulation industry. It is a sign of a great oeuvre and a dazzling artist, but much less of critical accuracy. A long-time student of managers and firms, Zuboff adopts a functionalist, positivist lens to portray the rise of a new mode of accumulation. Her narrative draws heavily from the companies’ own accounts, dozens of interviews with data scientists and other accessible materials on business development. With a far from apologetic stance, the Harvard Business School professor openly admits the failings of neoliberal dogma and draws from intellectual traditions of heterodox schools. Hayek, Friedman and Jensen receive no mercy when Zuboff unpacks their political economy as in fact stripping people of agency and subduing them to the market. Instead, the book is rich with Polanyi’s “fictitious commodities” and “double movement”, Marx-inspired “behavioral surplus” and Harvey’s “accumulation by dispossession”. Big Tech’s “coup from above” (p. 463) is one of the book’s excellent metaphors, clearly pointing to the stakes of the conflict en large: the loss of human sovereignty, a precondition for collective action and social order. Zuboff warns of this danger to democracy and free will, and the alarm has since rung true, be it in the case of algorithmically amplified genocide in Myanmar, or people unable to take sound decisions thanks to COVID-19 vaccine disinformation. The book reads essentially as a manifesto of uncertainty-as-liberty, human unpredictability and possibility of other futures, although a viable proposal of the better future is missing from this picture. “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism” employs Arendt’s ideas on free will to battle the impossible vision of perfect information and full rationality, now powering the fanaticism of fully automated smart contracts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJAR – International Journal of Action Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJAR – International Journal of Action Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v18i1.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJAR – International Journal of Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v18i1.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
监视资本主义席卷了大众的想象,学术界也迅速跟进。如果你试图简单地描述当前的以利润为目的的数据化制度,以及日益主宰市场和社会的耗电量巨大的科技公司,那么这个词就是时下的流行词。它是Netflix的《社会困境》(the Social Dilemma)的智力支柱,也是跨学科文章中必要的关键参考。但读过肖珊娜•祖伯夫(Shoshanna Zuboff)的《监视资本主义时代》(The Age of Surveillance Capitalism)后,我怀疑这个概念已经有了自己的生命,它被重新诠释,扩展到了祖伯夫对行为操纵行业的描述之外。这是一个伟大的作品和一个令人眼花缭乱的艺术家的标志,但更不是关键的准确性。作为一名长期研究经理人和企业的学者,祖博夫采用了一种功能主义和实证主义的视角来描绘一种新的积累模式的兴起。她的叙述大量取材于这些公司自己的叙述、对数十位数据科学家的采访,以及其他有关业务发展的可获取材料。这位哈佛商学院(Harvard Business School)教授公开承认新自由主义教条的失败,并借鉴了非正统学派的知识传统,但他的立场远非道歉。当祖伯夫将哈耶克、弗里德曼和詹森的政治经济学拆解为实际上剥夺了人们的能动性并使他们屈服于市场时,哈耶克、弗里德曼和詹森没有得到任何怜悯。相反,这本书充满了波兰尼的“虚拟商品”和“双重运动”,马克思启发的“行为盈余”和哈维的“剥夺积累”。科技巨头的“自上而下的政变”(第463页)是这本书的一个出色隐喻,清楚地指出了这场冲突的利害关系:人类主权的丧失,这是集体行动和社会秩序的先决条件。祖博夫警告说,这种危险对民主和自由意志构成了威胁,自那以后,无论是在缅甸被算法放大的种族灭绝事件中,还是由于COVID-19疫苗虚假信息而无法做出明智决定的人们,警报都敲响了。这本书读起来基本上是一份关于不确定性的宣言——自由、人类的不可预测性和其他未来的可能性,尽管在这幅图景中没有一个关于更美好未来的可行建议。《监视资本主义的时代》运用阿伦特关于自由意志的思想,与完美信息和完全理性的不可能愿景作斗争,现在为全自动智能合约的狂热提供动力。
Surveil and Control: A critical review of “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism”
Surveillance capitalism has taken popular imagination by storm, and the scholarly world quickly followed. It is the nom du jour if one attempts to briefly describe the current regime of datafication for profit, and the power-hungry technology companies which increasingly dominate markets and societies. It serves as the intellectual backbone of Netflix’s The Social Dilemma, and that one necessary critical reference in articles across disciplines. But having read Shoshanna Zuboff’s “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism”, I suspect the concept has taken a life of its own, reinterpreted, expanded beyond Zuboff’s account of behavioural manipulation industry. It is a sign of a great oeuvre and a dazzling artist, but much less of critical accuracy. A long-time student of managers and firms, Zuboff adopts a functionalist, positivist lens to portray the rise of a new mode of accumulation. Her narrative draws heavily from the companies’ own accounts, dozens of interviews with data scientists and other accessible materials on business development. With a far from apologetic stance, the Harvard Business School professor openly admits the failings of neoliberal dogma and draws from intellectual traditions of heterodox schools. Hayek, Friedman and Jensen receive no mercy when Zuboff unpacks their political economy as in fact stripping people of agency and subduing them to the market. Instead, the book is rich with Polanyi’s “fictitious commodities” and “double movement”, Marx-inspired “behavioral surplus” and Harvey’s “accumulation by dispossession”. Big Tech’s “coup from above” (p. 463) is one of the book’s excellent metaphors, clearly pointing to the stakes of the conflict en large: the loss of human sovereignty, a precondition for collective action and social order. Zuboff warns of this danger to democracy and free will, and the alarm has since rung true, be it in the case of algorithmically amplified genocide in Myanmar, or people unable to take sound decisions thanks to COVID-19 vaccine disinformation. The book reads essentially as a manifesto of uncertainty-as-liberty, human unpredictability and possibility of other futures, although a viable proposal of the better future is missing from this picture. “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism” employs Arendt’s ideas on free will to battle the impossible vision of perfect information and full rationality, now powering the fanaticism of fully automated smart contracts.