基于QoS参数的IPv4和IPv6 OpenVPN协议性能对比分析

Pradistia Edo Kristianto, A. T. Putra
{"title":"基于QoS参数的IPv4和IPv6 OpenVPN协议性能对比分析","authors":"Pradistia Edo Kristianto, A. T. Putra","doi":"10.15294/jaist.v3i1.49095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network security is still a big concern in data exchange because it involves users' data privacy. There are several ways to secure data exchange on the internet. One of them uses a Virtual Private Network (VPN), which functions as a tunnel in the public internet that securely connects users to the local network. This research will analyze the performance of the OpenVPN IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. The method used to determine the performance results is based on the QoS parameters. The performance analysis results obtained are throughput OpenVPN IPv6 is better, namely 198.155 Kbps on ICMP data packets, 35.704 Kbps on FTP data packets, and 17.698 on TCP data packets. The delay value of OpenVPN in IPv4 is superior, namely 1.4s for ICMP data packets, and on IPv6, FTP data packages are superior with 0.1s. Jitter values indicate OpenVPN IPv6 is better with similar results. Packet loss values on OpenVPN for both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols are 0%. Based on these results, throughput IPv6 OpenVPN on ICMP data packets and delay on FTP data packets is better than IPv4 OpenVPN.","PeriodicalId":418742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 OpenVPN Protocol Performance Based on QoS Parameters\",\"authors\":\"Pradistia Edo Kristianto, A. T. Putra\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/jaist.v3i1.49095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Network security is still a big concern in data exchange because it involves users' data privacy. There are several ways to secure data exchange on the internet. One of them uses a Virtual Private Network (VPN), which functions as a tunnel in the public internet that securely connects users to the local network. This research will analyze the performance of the OpenVPN IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. The method used to determine the performance results is based on the QoS parameters. The performance analysis results obtained are throughput OpenVPN IPv6 is better, namely 198.155 Kbps on ICMP data packets, 35.704 Kbps on FTP data packets, and 17.698 on TCP data packets. The delay value of OpenVPN in IPv4 is superior, namely 1.4s for ICMP data packets, and on IPv6, FTP data packages are superior with 0.1s. Jitter values indicate OpenVPN IPv6 is better with similar results. Packet loss values on OpenVPN for both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols are 0%. Based on these results, throughput IPv6 OpenVPN on ICMP data packets and delay on FTP data packets is better than IPv4 OpenVPN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":418742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/jaist.v3i1.49095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jaist.v3i1.49095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络安全仍然是数据交换中的一个大问题,因为它涉及到用户的数据隐私。有几种方法可以确保互联网上数据交换的安全。其中一种是使用虚拟专用网(VPN),它在公共互联网中充当隧道,将用户安全地连接到本地网络。本研究将分析OpenVPN IPv4和IPv6协议的性能。确定性能结果的方法是基于QoS参数。性能分析结果表明,OpenVPN IPv6的吞吐量更好,ICMP数据包的吞吐量为198.155 Kbps, FTP数据包的吞吐量为35.704 Kbps, TCP数据包的吞吐量为17.698。OpenVPN在IPv4上的时延较优,ICMP数据包的时延为1.4s;在IPv6上的时延较优,FTP数据包的时延为0.1s。抖动值表明OpenVPN IPv6更好,结果相似。OpenVPN在IPv4和IPv6协议下的丢包值都是0%。基于这些结果,IPv6 OpenVPN对ICMP数据包的吞吐量和对FTP数据包的延迟优于IPv4 OpenVPN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of IPv4 and IPv6 OpenVPN Protocol Performance Based on QoS Parameters
Network security is still a big concern in data exchange because it involves users' data privacy. There are several ways to secure data exchange on the internet. One of them uses a Virtual Private Network (VPN), which functions as a tunnel in the public internet that securely connects users to the local network. This research will analyze the performance of the OpenVPN IPv4 and IPv6 protocols. The method used to determine the performance results is based on the QoS parameters. The performance analysis results obtained are throughput OpenVPN IPv6 is better, namely 198.155 Kbps on ICMP data packets, 35.704 Kbps on FTP data packets, and 17.698 on TCP data packets. The delay value of OpenVPN in IPv4 is superior, namely 1.4s for ICMP data packets, and on IPv6, FTP data packages are superior with 0.1s. Jitter values indicate OpenVPN IPv6 is better with similar results. Packet loss values on OpenVPN for both IPv4 and IPv6 protocols are 0%. Based on these results, throughput IPv6 OpenVPN on ICMP data packets and delay on FTP data packets is better than IPv4 OpenVPN.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信