{"title":"东南欧的边界:阿依达·贝吉奇和Želimir Žilnik电影中的移民","authors":"Ivan Leković","doi":"10.5117/9789463724166_ch11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses recent works by Aida Begić and Želimir Žilnik—\n Never Leave Me (2017) and The Most Beautiful Country in the World (2018),\n respectively. These works narrate the evolving lives of migrants on the\n borderlines of the Balkan Anatolian region. Migrants’ aspiration to\n reach their “dream land” is interpreted as a journey towards unfolding\n “the virtual realities of consciousness” of both actors and directors. The\n reflections of both Begić and Žilnik on the issue of migration, filmed in\n an accented style, highlight their own post-Yugoslav perspectives, which\n allows us to analyse the two films in context of “return to homeland”—a\n concept present both in Naficy’s theories of an accented cinema and in\n Boym’s notion of “reflective nostalgia.”","PeriodicalId":446435,"journal":{"name":"Refugees and Migrants in Contemporary Film, Art and Media","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Borderlines of South-Eastern Europe : Migration in the Films of Aida Begić and Želimir Žilnik\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Leković\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789463724166_ch11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyses recent works by Aida Begić and Želimir Žilnik—\\n Never Leave Me (2017) and The Most Beautiful Country in the World (2018),\\n respectively. These works narrate the evolving lives of migrants on the\\n borderlines of the Balkan Anatolian region. Migrants’ aspiration to\\n reach their “dream land” is interpreted as a journey towards unfolding\\n “the virtual realities of consciousness” of both actors and directors. The\\n reflections of both Begić and Žilnik on the issue of migration, filmed in\\n an accented style, highlight their own post-Yugoslav perspectives, which\\n allows us to analyse the two films in context of “return to homeland”—a\\n concept present both in Naficy’s theories of an accented cinema and in\\n Boym’s notion of “reflective nostalgia.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":446435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Refugees and Migrants in Contemporary Film, Art and Media\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Refugees and Migrants in Contemporary Film, Art and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463724166_ch11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refugees and Migrants in Contemporary Film, Art and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463724166_ch11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the Borderlines of South-Eastern Europe : Migration in the Films of Aida Begić and Želimir Žilnik
This paper analyses recent works by Aida Begić and Želimir Žilnik—
Never Leave Me (2017) and The Most Beautiful Country in the World (2018),
respectively. These works narrate the evolving lives of migrants on the
borderlines of the Balkan Anatolian region. Migrants’ aspiration to
reach their “dream land” is interpreted as a journey towards unfolding
“the virtual realities of consciousness” of both actors and directors. The
reflections of both Begić and Žilnik on the issue of migration, filmed in
an accented style, highlight their own post-Yugoslav perspectives, which
allows us to analyse the two films in context of “return to homeland”—a
concept present both in Naficy’s theories of an accented cinema and in
Boym’s notion of “reflective nostalgia.”