超越怨恨的批判:介绍彼得·斯洛特戴克的快乐现代性

S. Tuinen
{"title":"超越怨恨的批判:介绍彼得·斯洛特戴克的快乐现代性","authors":"S. Tuinen","doi":"10.2752/175174307X226861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay serves as an introduction both to this special issue and to the works of Peter Sloterdijk. It starts out from the opposition between the critical and the affirmative projects in modern philosophy. It is my intent to demonstrate how Sloterdijk displaces this opposition in favor of what I propose to call a “jovial modernity” and a post-Heideggerian philosophy of Gelassenheit or “relief.” After a general outline of the Spharen -project, I discuss the shifts in Sloterdijk’s development of Ernst Junger’s critical concept of “mobilization” and show how his engagement with critical theory has gradually transformed from an aesthesis of the event, through a Nietzschean “transvaluation of all values” – generosity instead of resentment as motivating force of critique – or “retuning” of Heidegger’s concept of the Lichtung , into a “poetical” and “global” constructivism. This is followed by the unraveling of three layers that have constituted the 1999 scandal following Sloterdijk’s reply to Heidegger’s letter On Humanism : Sloterdijk’s actual text on humanism and Bildung in the age of genetic engineering; the scandal and the mass-medialization of philosophical critique; and the hypermorality of the last, but still all too dominant generation of Frankfurt School theorists. Finally, I draw some political conclusions by opposing another source of inspiration for Sloterdijk’s “joviality,” the Luhmannian theory of complexity, to the bivalent “passion for the real” that, despite all that has happened in the twentieth century, still seems to inform both the realist projects of philosophical critique and the Heideggerian belief in the “ Kehre ”.","PeriodicalId":413879,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Politics: An International Journal","volume":"29 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critique beyond resentment: an introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s jovial modernity\",\"authors\":\"S. Tuinen\",\"doi\":\"10.2752/175174307X226861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay serves as an introduction both to this special issue and to the works of Peter Sloterdijk. It starts out from the opposition between the critical and the affirmative projects in modern philosophy. It is my intent to demonstrate how Sloterdijk displaces this opposition in favor of what I propose to call a “jovial modernity” and a post-Heideggerian philosophy of Gelassenheit or “relief.” After a general outline of the Spharen -project, I discuss the shifts in Sloterdijk’s development of Ernst Junger’s critical concept of “mobilization” and show how his engagement with critical theory has gradually transformed from an aesthesis of the event, through a Nietzschean “transvaluation of all values” – generosity instead of resentment as motivating force of critique – or “retuning” of Heidegger’s concept of the Lichtung , into a “poetical” and “global” constructivism. This is followed by the unraveling of three layers that have constituted the 1999 scandal following Sloterdijk’s reply to Heidegger’s letter On Humanism : Sloterdijk’s actual text on humanism and Bildung in the age of genetic engineering; the scandal and the mass-medialization of philosophical critique; and the hypermorality of the last, but still all too dominant generation of Frankfurt School theorists. Finally, I draw some political conclusions by opposing another source of inspiration for Sloterdijk’s “joviality,” the Luhmannian theory of complexity, to the bivalent “passion for the real” that, despite all that has happened in the twentieth century, still seems to inform both the realist projects of philosophical critique and the Heideggerian belief in the “ Kehre ”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Politics: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Politics: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2752/175174307X226861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Politics: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2752/175174307X226861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

这篇文章既是对这一期特刊的介绍,也是对彼得·斯洛特戴克作品的介绍。它始于现代哲学中批判与肯定的对立。我的意图是证明斯洛特戴克是如何取代这种对立的,以支持我所提议的“快乐的现代性”和后海德格尔的“解脱”哲学。在概述了Spharen项目之后,我将讨论Sloterdijk对恩斯特·荣格(Ernst Junger)的“动员”批判概念的发展的转变,并展示他对批判理论的参与是如何逐渐从事件的美学转变的,通过尼采式的“对所有价值的重新评估”——慷慨而不是怨恨作为批判的动力——或“回归”海德格尔的Lichtung概念,进入“诗意的”和“全球的”建构主义。紧接着,在斯洛特戴克回复海德格尔的《论人文主义》的信之后,1999年的丑闻就从三个层面展开了:斯洛特戴克关于基因工程时代人文主义和建设的实际文本;哲学批判的丑闻与大众传媒化以及最后一代,但仍占主导地位的法兰克福学派理论家的超道德。最后,我将斯洛特戴克的“快乐”的另一个灵感来源——卢曼的复杂性理论——与二元“对真实的激情”相比较,得出一些政治结论。尽管在20世纪发生了这么多事情,但这种“对真实的激情”似乎仍然为哲学批判的现实主义项目和海德格尔对“Kehre”的信仰提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critique beyond resentment: an introduction to Peter Sloterdijk’s jovial modernity
This essay serves as an introduction both to this special issue and to the works of Peter Sloterdijk. It starts out from the opposition between the critical and the affirmative projects in modern philosophy. It is my intent to demonstrate how Sloterdijk displaces this opposition in favor of what I propose to call a “jovial modernity” and a post-Heideggerian philosophy of Gelassenheit or “relief.” After a general outline of the Spharen -project, I discuss the shifts in Sloterdijk’s development of Ernst Junger’s critical concept of “mobilization” and show how his engagement with critical theory has gradually transformed from an aesthesis of the event, through a Nietzschean “transvaluation of all values” – generosity instead of resentment as motivating force of critique – or “retuning” of Heidegger’s concept of the Lichtung , into a “poetical” and “global” constructivism. This is followed by the unraveling of three layers that have constituted the 1999 scandal following Sloterdijk’s reply to Heidegger’s letter On Humanism : Sloterdijk’s actual text on humanism and Bildung in the age of genetic engineering; the scandal and the mass-medialization of philosophical critique; and the hypermorality of the last, but still all too dominant generation of Frankfurt School theorists. Finally, I draw some political conclusions by opposing another source of inspiration for Sloterdijk’s “joviality,” the Luhmannian theory of complexity, to the bivalent “passion for the real” that, despite all that has happened in the twentieth century, still seems to inform both the realist projects of philosophical critique and the Heideggerian belief in the “ Kehre ”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信