{"title":"开伯尔-普赫图赫瓦省支尔格法的历史——伊斯兰法和支尔格法是否具有相同的历史法学方法?","authors":"Lutfullah Saqib, Rasheed Ahmad Faizy","doi":"10.37556/al-idah.039.01.0592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jirga, a historical legal antique has been an informal adjudication of Pakhtūns. In the present research endeavor conventional Jirga and its various facets had been critically examined from Sharī’ah perspective i.e. whether such Jirga and its procedure is based on Islamic law or not. Jarga bears a very close resemblance in terms of structure and procedure with Qad̝ā and Taḥkīm. Jirga has been simple with no binding implementation. Since 18th century and on-wards, Jirga has evolved into an informal institution of dispute resolution. The criterion for Jirga-Mārān, and Qād̝ī or Ḥākim, astonishingly, have been identical. Besides the free consent, justice dispenser (Jarga-Mār/Qād̝ī or Ḥākim) was supposed not be relative or party (himself) in the matter at all. The fuqahā, both classical and contemporary, have discussed the intermediation through Jirga. This study focuses on compliance and non-compliance of Jirga to Qad̝ā.","PeriodicalId":159824,"journal":{"name":"Al-Idah","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"History of Jirga Laws in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa - Do Islamic Law and Jirga Laws had the same Historical Jurisprudential Approach?\",\"authors\":\"Lutfullah Saqib, Rasheed Ahmad Faizy\",\"doi\":\"10.37556/al-idah.039.01.0592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jirga, a historical legal antique has been an informal adjudication of Pakhtūns. In the present research endeavor conventional Jirga and its various facets had been critically examined from Sharī’ah perspective i.e. whether such Jirga and its procedure is based on Islamic law or not. Jarga bears a very close resemblance in terms of structure and procedure with Qad̝ā and Taḥkīm. Jirga has been simple with no binding implementation. Since 18th century and on-wards, Jirga has evolved into an informal institution of dispute resolution. The criterion for Jirga-Mārān, and Qād̝ī or Ḥākim, astonishingly, have been identical. Besides the free consent, justice dispenser (Jarga-Mār/Qād̝ī or Ḥākim) was supposed not be relative or party (himself) in the matter at all. The fuqahā, both classical and contemporary, have discussed the intermediation through Jirga. This study focuses on compliance and non-compliance of Jirga to Qad̝ā.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Idah\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Idah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.039.01.0592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Idah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.039.01.0592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
支尔格会议,一个历史悠久的法律古董一直是一个非正式的裁决Pakhtūns。在目前的研究努力中,传统支尔格会议及其各个方面从shari ' ah的角度进行了批判性的考察,即这种支尔格会议及其程序是否基于伊斯兰法律。Jarga在结构和程序上与Qad æ r ā和Taḥkīm非常相似。支尔格会议一直很简单,没有约束性的执行。自18世纪以来,支尔格会议已发展成为解决争端的非正式机构。令人惊讶的是,Jirga-Mārān和Qād æ r æ or Ḥākim的标准是相同的。除了自由同意之外,司法分施者(Jarga-Mār/Qād æ r æ or Ḥākim)也不应该是本案的亲属或当事人(他自己)。古典和当代的富卡哈都讨论过支尔格的调解。本研究的重点是支尔格对Qad ā r ā的遵守和不遵守。
History of Jirga Laws in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa - Do Islamic Law and Jirga Laws had the same Historical Jurisprudential Approach?
Jirga, a historical legal antique has been an informal adjudication of Pakhtūns. In the present research endeavor conventional Jirga and its various facets had been critically examined from Sharī’ah perspective i.e. whether such Jirga and its procedure is based on Islamic law or not. Jarga bears a very close resemblance in terms of structure and procedure with Qad̝ā and Taḥkīm. Jirga has been simple with no binding implementation. Since 18th century and on-wards, Jirga has evolved into an informal institution of dispute resolution. The criterion for Jirga-Mārān, and Qād̝ī or Ḥākim, astonishingly, have been identical. Besides the free consent, justice dispenser (Jarga-Mār/Qād̝ī or Ḥākim) was supposed not be relative or party (himself) in the matter at all. The fuqahā, both classical and contemporary, have discussed the intermediation through Jirga. This study focuses on compliance and non-compliance of Jirga to Qad̝ā.