基础设施报告和国家债券评级

Earl D. Benson, Barry R. Marks
{"title":"基础设施报告和国家债券评级","authors":"Earl D. Benson, Barry R. Marks","doi":"10.1111/pbaf.12156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Municipal governments are given the choice of two methods for reporting infrastructure assets, the depreciation approach and the modified approach. Using a model that simultaneously estimates a state's bond rating and a state's choice of the modified approach to reporting infrastructure, empirical tests suggest that bond rating agencies evaluate the government-wide accounting information differently for states that adopt the modified approach compared to states that use depreciation accounting. The use of the modified approach may lead to either a higher or lower bond rating, depending on the level of other accounting measures.","PeriodicalId":135866,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Public Budgeting & Finance","volume":"95 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infrastructure Reporting and State Bond Ratings\",\"authors\":\"Earl D. Benson, Barry R. Marks\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pbaf.12156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Municipal governments are given the choice of two methods for reporting infrastructure assets, the depreciation approach and the modified approach. Using a model that simultaneously estimates a state's bond rating and a state's choice of the modified approach to reporting infrastructure, empirical tests suggest that bond rating agencies evaluate the government-wide accounting information differently for states that adopt the modified approach compared to states that use depreciation accounting. The use of the modified approach may lead to either a higher or lower bond rating, depending on the level of other accounting measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Public Budgeting & Finance\",\"volume\":\"95 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Public Budgeting & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Public Budgeting & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pbaf.12156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

市政府可以选择折旧法和修正法两种报告基础设施资产的方法。使用一个模型,同时估计一个州的债券评级和一个州对报告基础设施的修改方法的选择,实证测试表明,债券评级机构对采用修改方法的州的政府范围内的会计信息的评估与使用折旧会计的州不同。根据其他会计措施的水平,使用修改后的方法可能导致更高或更低的债券评级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Infrastructure Reporting and State Bond Ratings
Municipal governments are given the choice of two methods for reporting infrastructure assets, the depreciation approach and the modified approach. Using a model that simultaneously estimates a state's bond rating and a state's choice of the modified approach to reporting infrastructure, empirical tests suggest that bond rating agencies evaluate the government-wide accounting information differently for states that adopt the modified approach compared to states that use depreciation accounting. The use of the modified approach may lead to either a higher or lower bond rating, depending on the level of other accounting measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信