重用你最喜欢的分析框架来处理产品线模型的工作流

Logan Murphy, Alessio Di Sandro, Ramy I. Shahin, M. Chechik
{"title":"重用你最喜欢的分析框架来处理产品线模型的工作流","authors":"Logan Murphy, Alessio Di Sandro, Ramy I. Shahin, M. Chechik","doi":"10.1145/3579027.3608983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model management frameworks support a wide array of analyses, transformations, and workflows, but lack native support for handling product lines of models. Yet the ubiquity of domains that heavily use model-driven techniques and are built using product lines, such as automotive, require adaptation, or lifting, of model management frameworks to be variability-aware. Lifting might introduce new implementation and validation costs, especially in safety-critical contexts. To facilitate the implementation and validation of variability-aware model management workflows, this paper provides a novel taxonomy of lifting methods. We compare the lifting methods in their capacity to reuse existing components and validation results. We then define a general framework for lifting and validating model management workflows, and report on an experience of lifting and validating modeling tasks and workflows in an existing Eclipse-based model management framework.","PeriodicalId":322542,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A","volume":"526 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reusing Your Favourite Analysis Framework to Handle Workflows of Product Line Models\",\"authors\":\"Logan Murphy, Alessio Di Sandro, Ramy I. Shahin, M. Chechik\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3579027.3608983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Model management frameworks support a wide array of analyses, transformations, and workflows, but lack native support for handling product lines of models. Yet the ubiquity of domains that heavily use model-driven techniques and are built using product lines, such as automotive, require adaptation, or lifting, of model management frameworks to be variability-aware. Lifting might introduce new implementation and validation costs, especially in safety-critical contexts. To facilitate the implementation and validation of variability-aware model management workflows, this paper provides a novel taxonomy of lifting methods. We compare the lifting methods in their capacity to reuse existing components and validation results. We then define a general framework for lifting and validating model management workflows, and report on an experience of lifting and validating modeling tasks and workflows in an existing Eclipse-based model management framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A\",\"volume\":\"526 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3579027.3608983\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3579027.3608983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

模型管理框架支持广泛的分析、转换和工作流,但是缺乏对处理模型产品线的本地支持。然而,大量使用模型驱动技术并使用产品线(如汽车)构建的领域的普遍存在,需要适应或提升模型管理框架以具有可变性意识。提升可能会引入新的实现和验证成本,特别是在安全关键的上下文中。为了促进可变性感知模型管理工作流的实现和验证,本文提供了一种新的提升方法分类。我们比较了提升方法的能力,以重用现有的组件和验证结果。然后我们定义一个提升和验证模型管理工作流的通用框架,并报告在现有的基于eclipse的模型管理框架中提升和验证建模任务和工作流的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reusing Your Favourite Analysis Framework to Handle Workflows of Product Line Models
Model management frameworks support a wide array of analyses, transformations, and workflows, but lack native support for handling product lines of models. Yet the ubiquity of domains that heavily use model-driven techniques and are built using product lines, such as automotive, require adaptation, or lifting, of model management frameworks to be variability-aware. Lifting might introduce new implementation and validation costs, especially in safety-critical contexts. To facilitate the implementation and validation of variability-aware model management workflows, this paper provides a novel taxonomy of lifting methods. We compare the lifting methods in their capacity to reuse existing components and validation results. We then define a general framework for lifting and validating model management workflows, and report on an experience of lifting and validating modeling tasks and workflows in an existing Eclipse-based model management framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信