癌症治疗

A. Arnold-Forster
{"title":"癌症治疗","authors":"A. Arnold-Forster","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198866145.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter investigates the invention, application, assessment, and justification of palliative surgery through the work of two practitioners: Charles Bell (1774–1842) and James Young Simpson (1811–1970). As this chapter will show, close attention to patient pain and suffering was essential to surgeons’ assessments of the efficacy of palliative surgery. Bell and Simpson performed palliative procedures partly because they were concerned by their patients’ suffering and, as suggested in Chapter 2, partly because they wanted to present themselves as enlightened, improving gentlemen. Indeed, the texts analysed here—and the promotion of palliative surgery more generally—provide an alternative portrayal to that of the crude and dispassionate Victorian practitioner.","PeriodicalId":292071,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Problem","volume":"26 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cancer Therapeutics\",\"authors\":\"A. Arnold-Forster\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198866145.003.0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter investigates the invention, application, assessment, and justification of palliative surgery through the work of two practitioners: Charles Bell (1774–1842) and James Young Simpson (1811–1970). As this chapter will show, close attention to patient pain and suffering was essential to surgeons’ assessments of the efficacy of palliative surgery. Bell and Simpson performed palliative procedures partly because they were concerned by their patients’ suffering and, as suggested in Chapter 2, partly because they wanted to present themselves as enlightened, improving gentlemen. Indeed, the texts analysed here—and the promotion of palliative surgery more generally—provide an alternative portrayal to that of the crude and dispassionate Victorian practitioner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cancer Problem\",\"volume\":\"26 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cancer Problem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866145.003.0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cancer Problem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866145.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章通过两位从业者:Charles Bell(1774-1842)和James Young Simpson(1811-1970)的工作来研究姑息性手术的发明、应用、评估和论证。正如本章所示,密切关注患者的疼痛和痛苦是外科医生评估姑息性手术疗效的必要条件。贝尔和辛普森进行姑息治疗的部分原因是他们关心病人的痛苦,正如第二章所述,部分原因是他们想把自己塑造成开明、进步的绅士。的确,本文所分析的文本——以及姑息手术的推广——提供了一种不同于维多利亚时代医生粗鲁而冷静的形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cancer Therapeutics
This chapter investigates the invention, application, assessment, and justification of palliative surgery through the work of two practitioners: Charles Bell (1774–1842) and James Young Simpson (1811–1970). As this chapter will show, close attention to patient pain and suffering was essential to surgeons’ assessments of the efficacy of palliative surgery. Bell and Simpson performed palliative procedures partly because they were concerned by their patients’ suffering and, as suggested in Chapter 2, partly because they wanted to present themselves as enlightened, improving gentlemen. Indeed, the texts analysed here—and the promotion of palliative surgery more generally—provide an alternative portrayal to that of the crude and dispassionate Victorian practitioner.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信