超越大规模成绩测试——国际组织教育评估工作的“心理转向”

Mike Zapp
{"title":"超越大规模成绩测试——国际组织教育评估工作的“心理转向”","authors":"Mike Zapp","doi":"10.1108/S1479-367920180000035006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis article put forward two claims. First, it argues that, historically, the rationale for education has shifted from religious and national indoctrination to, in the more recent neoliberal period, human capital and the related notion of individual empowerment. Second, the article argues that the recent shift toward individual empowerment is reflected in international organizations’ (IOs) changing emphases in education. IOs’ educational agenda has undergone various changes since their early work in the 1960s: From the structural expansion of national education systems to the measurement of individual educational achievement through a focus on competencies and, most recently, individual psychosocial development. \n \nBased on a content analysis of 60 documents from 38 IOs involved in international education networks between 1990 and 2015, this work identified an expanding field of IOs directing attention to the mental capabilities of a learner. The proliferated model of an individual actorhood reflected in these novel assessment designs will be presented and embedded in wider discussions about the cultural construction of the individual in contemporary world polity.","PeriodicalId":130720,"journal":{"name":"Cross-nationally Comparative, Evidence-based Educational Policymaking and Reform","volume":"124 1-3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Large-Scale Achievement Testing – The ‘Psychological Turn’ in International Organizations’ Work on Educational Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Mike Zapp\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S1479-367920180000035006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nThis article put forward two claims. First, it argues that, historically, the rationale for education has shifted from religious and national indoctrination to, in the more recent neoliberal period, human capital and the related notion of individual empowerment. Second, the article argues that the recent shift toward individual empowerment is reflected in international organizations’ (IOs) changing emphases in education. IOs’ educational agenda has undergone various changes since their early work in the 1960s: From the structural expansion of national education systems to the measurement of individual educational achievement through a focus on competencies and, most recently, individual psychosocial development. \\n \\nBased on a content analysis of 60 documents from 38 IOs involved in international education networks between 1990 and 2015, this work identified an expanding field of IOs directing attention to the mental capabilities of a learner. The proliferated model of an individual actorhood reflected in these novel assessment designs will be presented and embedded in wider discussions about the cultural construction of the individual in contemporary world polity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cross-nationally Comparative, Evidence-based Educational Policymaking and Reform\",\"volume\":\"124 1-3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cross-nationally Comparative, Evidence-based Educational Policymaking and Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920180000035006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross-nationally Comparative, Evidence-based Educational Policymaking and Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920180000035006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文提出了两点主张。首先,它认为,从历史上看,教育的基本原理已经从宗教和民族灌输转变为,在最近的新自由主义时期,人力资本和个人赋权的相关概念。其次,本文认为,最近向个人赋权的转变反映在国际组织(IOs)对教育重点的变化上。自20世纪60年代早期工作以来,国际教育组织的教育议程经历了各种变化:从国家教育系统的结构性扩张,到通过关注能力来衡量个人教育成就,以及最近的个人心理社会发展。基于对1990年至2015年间参与国际教育网络的38个国际组织的60份文件的内容分析,这项工作确定了一个不断扩大的国际组织领域,将注意力集中在学习者的心理能力上。在这些新的评估设计中所反映的个体行为的扩散模型将被呈现并嵌入到关于当代世界政治中个体文化建构的更广泛的讨论中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Large-Scale Achievement Testing – The ‘Psychological Turn’ in International Organizations’ Work on Educational Assessment
Abstract This article put forward two claims. First, it argues that, historically, the rationale for education has shifted from religious and national indoctrination to, in the more recent neoliberal period, human capital and the related notion of individual empowerment. Second, the article argues that the recent shift toward individual empowerment is reflected in international organizations’ (IOs) changing emphases in education. IOs’ educational agenda has undergone various changes since their early work in the 1960s: From the structural expansion of national education systems to the measurement of individual educational achievement through a focus on competencies and, most recently, individual psychosocial development. Based on a content analysis of 60 documents from 38 IOs involved in international education networks between 1990 and 2015, this work identified an expanding field of IOs directing attention to the mental capabilities of a learner. The proliferated model of an individual actorhood reflected in these novel assessment designs will be presented and embedded in wider discussions about the cultural construction of the individual in contemporary world polity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信