{"title":"一位合著者的观点是:停止增长到底告诉了我们什么?","authors":"Jorgen Randers","doi":"10.52497/revue-opcd.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"50 years ago the Limits to Growth report, authored by Dennis and Donella Meadows, Jorgen Randers and William W. Behrens III was published. Accused by some to announce the apocalypse, discarded by others, it had mostly been heavilt discussed without being read much. This article is the occasion to come back to some of these misunderstandings and to reaffirm, 50 years later, that this report was right on a number of issues and the solutions required to tackle them.","PeriodicalId":405823,"journal":{"name":"Mondes en décroissance","volume":"20 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le point de vue d’un co-auteur : Que nous disait réellement Halte à la croissance ?\",\"authors\":\"Jorgen Randers\",\"doi\":\"10.52497/revue-opcd.230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"50 years ago the Limits to Growth report, authored by Dennis and Donella Meadows, Jorgen Randers and William W. Behrens III was published. Accused by some to announce the apocalypse, discarded by others, it had mostly been heavilt discussed without being read much. This article is the occasion to come back to some of these misunderstandings and to reaffirm, 50 years later, that this report was right on a number of issues and the solutions required to tackle them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mondes en décroissance\",\"volume\":\"20 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mondes en décroissance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52497/revue-opcd.230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mondes en décroissance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52497/revue-opcd.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Le point de vue d’un co-auteur : Que nous disait réellement Halte à la croissance ?
50 years ago the Limits to Growth report, authored by Dennis and Donella Meadows, Jorgen Randers and William W. Behrens III was published. Accused by some to announce the apocalypse, discarded by others, it had mostly been heavilt discussed without being read much. This article is the occasion to come back to some of these misunderstandings and to reaffirm, 50 years later, that this report was right on a number of issues and the solutions required to tackle them.