五电平NNPC逆变器有限控制集模型预测控制方法的比较

Hua Liao, T. Jin, D. L. Mon‐Nzongo, Jinquan Tang, Ziqiang Liu
{"title":"五电平NNPC逆变器有限控制集模型预测控制方法的比较","authors":"Hua Liao, T. Jin, D. L. Mon‐Nzongo, Jinquan Tang, Ziqiang Liu","doi":"10.1109/PRECEDE51386.2021.9681030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the topology of five level nested neutral point clamped (NNPC) grid connected inverter, this paper compares two type of finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) methods to reduce the amount of calculation time compare with the traditional FCS-MPC. The first method is based on space vector modulation approach which uses 60- degree voltage state vector for the prediction to reduce the calculation time of each control period in FCS-MPC algorithm. While the second method is to simplify the calculation time by using the FCS-MPC based on adjacent state vector method. Through comparative analysis, it can be seen that the 60 degrees sector FCS-MPC have similar performances regarding the current THD; the upper and lower DC voltage deviation of DC- link capacitors. The main difference is on the computation time which results to 35 control periods compare to 125 for the traditional FCS-MPC. The adjacent state vector method results to 7-29 control period.","PeriodicalId":161011,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (PRECEDE)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control Methods for Five-Level NNPC Inverter\",\"authors\":\"Hua Liao, T. Jin, D. L. Mon‐Nzongo, Jinquan Tang, Ziqiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PRECEDE51386.2021.9681030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the topology of five level nested neutral point clamped (NNPC) grid connected inverter, this paper compares two type of finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) methods to reduce the amount of calculation time compare with the traditional FCS-MPC. The first method is based on space vector modulation approach which uses 60- degree voltage state vector for the prediction to reduce the calculation time of each control period in FCS-MPC algorithm. While the second method is to simplify the calculation time by using the FCS-MPC based on adjacent state vector method. Through comparative analysis, it can be seen that the 60 degrees sector FCS-MPC have similar performances regarding the current THD; the upper and lower DC voltage deviation of DC- link capacitors. The main difference is on the computation time which results to 35 control periods compare to 125 for the traditional FCS-MPC. The adjacent state vector method results to 7-29 control period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (PRECEDE)\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (PRECEDE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRECEDE51386.2021.9681030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Predictive Control of Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (PRECEDE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRECEDE51386.2021.9681030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于五层嵌套中性点箝位(NNPC)逆变器的拓扑结构,比较了两种有限控制集模型预测控制(FCS-MPC)方法,与传统的FCS-MPC方法相比,减少了计算时间。第一种方法是基于空间矢量调制方法,采用60度电压状态矢量进行预测,减少了FCS-MPC算法中每个控制周期的计算时间。第二种方法是采用基于相邻状态向量的FCS-MPC方法来简化计算时间。通过对比分析可以看出,60度扇形FCS-MPC对于当前THD具有相似的性能;直流链路电容器的上、下直流电压偏差。主要的区别在于计算时间,它导致35个控制周期,而传统的FCS-MPC为125个控制周期。邻态向量法控制期为7-29。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control Methods for Five-Level NNPC Inverter
Based on the topology of five level nested neutral point clamped (NNPC) grid connected inverter, this paper compares two type of finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) methods to reduce the amount of calculation time compare with the traditional FCS-MPC. The first method is based on space vector modulation approach which uses 60- degree voltage state vector for the prediction to reduce the calculation time of each control period in FCS-MPC algorithm. While the second method is to simplify the calculation time by using the FCS-MPC based on adjacent state vector method. Through comparative analysis, it can be seen that the 60 degrees sector FCS-MPC have similar performances regarding the current THD; the upper and lower DC voltage deviation of DC- link capacitors. The main difference is on the computation time which results to 35 control periods compare to 125 for the traditional FCS-MPC. The adjacent state vector method results to 7-29 control period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信