评估银行市场监管成本的方法

K. Freimanis, Maija Šenfelde
{"title":"评估银行市场监管成本的方法","authors":"K. Freimanis, Maija Šenfelde","doi":"10.3846/CIBMEE.2021.600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – In the field of the economics’ regulation researchers so far have built the conceptual framework\nshowing how the deadweight loss of market failures decrease and costs of the government intervention increase with\nthe increased level of the government intervention. In order to quantify relationships between the level of intervention,\nintervention costs and the deadweight loss with econometric models it is important to understand how to quantify the\nregulation costs as a part of intervention costs. The objective of the research presented in this paper is to find the appropriate methodology for the quantification of the regulation costs in the banking market.\nResearch methodology – literature review (regarding theories), mathematical methods for quantification and econometric\nmethods for validation purposes.\nFindings – research shows that in the assessment of regulation costs three main stakeholders should be included – microprudential regulator, macroprudential regulator and financial regulation’s policy maker. Research presents their cost\nassessment methodology. Its validation shows that in general methodology works as expected, i.e., higher government\nintervention levels lead to higher regulation costs, however this general rule has exceptions, which in authors’ view\nindicates that other factors have an impact on the cost levels.\nResearch limitations – research shows how to assess the costs of main stakeholders based on the publicly available\ninformation. More precise view could be obtained if in the cooperation with authorities more details on certain cost\nitems are received.\nPractical implications – research results will be used to assess all government intervention costs (other positions include\ncompliance costs and other indirect costs) and finalize the quantification of the framework. Quantified framework could\nbe used for more precise policy making regarding the regulation of the banking market.\nOriginality/Value – research shows how to quantify the regulation costs of the banking market as currently there are\nonly conceptual ideas.","PeriodicalId":237890,"journal":{"name":"Selected papers of the International Scientific Conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering 2021”","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"METHODOLOGY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF REGULATION COSTS IN THE BANKING MARKET\",\"authors\":\"K. Freimanis, Maija Šenfelde\",\"doi\":\"10.3846/CIBMEE.2021.600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – In the field of the economics’ regulation researchers so far have built the conceptual framework\\nshowing how the deadweight loss of market failures decrease and costs of the government intervention increase with\\nthe increased level of the government intervention. In order to quantify relationships between the level of intervention,\\nintervention costs and the deadweight loss with econometric models it is important to understand how to quantify the\\nregulation costs as a part of intervention costs. The objective of the research presented in this paper is to find the appropriate methodology for the quantification of the regulation costs in the banking market.\\nResearch methodology – literature review (regarding theories), mathematical methods for quantification and econometric\\nmethods for validation purposes.\\nFindings – research shows that in the assessment of regulation costs three main stakeholders should be included – microprudential regulator, macroprudential regulator and financial regulation’s policy maker. Research presents their cost\\nassessment methodology. Its validation shows that in general methodology works as expected, i.e., higher government\\nintervention levels lead to higher regulation costs, however this general rule has exceptions, which in authors’ view\\nindicates that other factors have an impact on the cost levels.\\nResearch limitations – research shows how to assess the costs of main stakeholders based on the publicly available\\ninformation. More precise view could be obtained if in the cooperation with authorities more details on certain cost\\nitems are received.\\nPractical implications – research results will be used to assess all government intervention costs (other positions include\\ncompliance costs and other indirect costs) and finalize the quantification of the framework. Quantified framework could\\nbe used for more precise policy making regarding the regulation of the banking market.\\nOriginality/Value – research shows how to quantify the regulation costs of the banking market as currently there are\\nonly conceptual ideas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Selected papers of the International Scientific Conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering 2021”\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Selected papers of the International Scientific Conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering 2021”\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3846/CIBMEE.2021.600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selected papers of the International Scientific Conference “Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering 2021”","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/CIBMEE.2021.600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的——在经济学监管领域,研究人员迄今为止已经建立了一个概念框架,表明市场失灵的无谓损失如何随着政府干预程度的增加而减少,政府干预的成本如何增加。为了用计量经济模型量化干预水平、干预成本和无谓损失之间的关系,理解如何量化作为干预成本一部分的监管成本是很重要的。本文提出的研究目标是找到适当的方法来量化银行市场的监管成本。研究方法-文献综述(关于理论),量化的数学方法和验证目的的计量经济学方法。研究结果表明,在监管成本的评估中,应包括三个主要利益相关者——微观审慎监管者、宏观审慎监管者和金融监管政策制定者。研究提出了他们的成本评估方法。其验证表明,在一般的方法工作如预期,即,更高的政府干预水平导致更高的监管成本,但这一一般规则有例外,这在作者的观点表明,其他因素对成本水平有影响。研究局限性-研究表明如何根据公开信息评估主要利益相关者的成本。如果在与当局的合作中收到关于某些条件的更多细节,就可以获得更精确的看法。实际影响-研究结果将用于评估所有政府干预成本(其他立场包括合规成本和其他间接成本),并最终确定框架的量化。量化框架可用于更精确地制定有关银行市场监管的政策。原创性/价值-研究表明如何量化银行市场的监管成本,因为目前只有概念性的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
METHODOLOGY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF REGULATION COSTS IN THE BANKING MARKET
Purpose – In the field of the economics’ regulation researchers so far have built the conceptual framework showing how the deadweight loss of market failures decrease and costs of the government intervention increase with the increased level of the government intervention. In order to quantify relationships between the level of intervention, intervention costs and the deadweight loss with econometric models it is important to understand how to quantify the regulation costs as a part of intervention costs. The objective of the research presented in this paper is to find the appropriate methodology for the quantification of the regulation costs in the banking market. Research methodology – literature review (regarding theories), mathematical methods for quantification and econometric methods for validation purposes. Findings – research shows that in the assessment of regulation costs three main stakeholders should be included – microprudential regulator, macroprudential regulator and financial regulation’s policy maker. Research presents their cost assessment methodology. Its validation shows that in general methodology works as expected, i.e., higher government intervention levels lead to higher regulation costs, however this general rule has exceptions, which in authors’ view indicates that other factors have an impact on the cost levels. Research limitations – research shows how to assess the costs of main stakeholders based on the publicly available information. More precise view could be obtained if in the cooperation with authorities more details on certain cost items are received. Practical implications – research results will be used to assess all government intervention costs (other positions include compliance costs and other indirect costs) and finalize the quantification of the framework. Quantified framework could be used for more precise policy making regarding the regulation of the banking market. Originality/Value – research shows how to quantify the regulation costs of the banking market as currently there are only conceptual ideas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信