Suchismita Roy, P. Sahu, S. Jena, RUDRANARAYAN SENAPATI
{"title":"并网光伏系统的电流控制结构","authors":"Suchismita Roy, P. Sahu, S. Jena, RUDRANARAYAN SENAPATI","doi":"10.1109/iSSSC56467.2022.10051629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present scenario, renewable energy source like solar power is the more convenient source of energy. Sustaining a steady DC link voltage and regulation of grid-current are challenging task in grid-tied photovoltaic (PV) system. These issues are overcome by designing a dual-loop control schemes; outer dc-link voltage loop which generates the reference signal for the inner current loop. The grid-tried inverter is used in photovoltaic (PV) system to inject the current with low total harmonic distortion (THD) into the utility grid by designing the efficient current controller. Generally, proportional-integral (PI) controller, proportional-resonant (PR) controller, dead-beat controller and hysteresis current controller are used in PV system to regulate the grid-current. These controllers are implemented in any one of the reference frames like; synchronous (d-q), stationary (α-β) or natural (a-b-c) reference frame. In this paper, the above-mentioned grid-current controllers are employed in all three reference frames and evaluate the steady-state performance of the controllers in terms of THD. The advantages and disadvantages of all grid-current controllers in each reference frames are briefly discussed and compared. This paper provides the best possible grid-current controller in three different reference frames. Finally, the simulation results from a two-stage 5.5 kW, 440 V (L-L), three-phase grid-tied PV system are provided to confirm the theoretical analysis and effectiveness of the control schemes.","PeriodicalId":334645,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Energy, Signal Processing and Cyber Security (iSSSC)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Control Structures for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System\",\"authors\":\"Suchismita Roy, P. Sahu, S. Jena, RUDRANARAYAN SENAPATI\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/iSSSC56467.2022.10051629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present scenario, renewable energy source like solar power is the more convenient source of energy. Sustaining a steady DC link voltage and regulation of grid-current are challenging task in grid-tied photovoltaic (PV) system. These issues are overcome by designing a dual-loop control schemes; outer dc-link voltage loop which generates the reference signal for the inner current loop. The grid-tried inverter is used in photovoltaic (PV) system to inject the current with low total harmonic distortion (THD) into the utility grid by designing the efficient current controller. Generally, proportional-integral (PI) controller, proportional-resonant (PR) controller, dead-beat controller and hysteresis current controller are used in PV system to regulate the grid-current. These controllers are implemented in any one of the reference frames like; synchronous (d-q), stationary (α-β) or natural (a-b-c) reference frame. In this paper, the above-mentioned grid-current controllers are employed in all three reference frames and evaluate the steady-state performance of the controllers in terms of THD. The advantages and disadvantages of all grid-current controllers in each reference frames are briefly discussed and compared. This paper provides the best possible grid-current controller in three different reference frames. Finally, the simulation results from a two-stage 5.5 kW, 440 V (L-L), three-phase grid-tied PV system are provided to confirm the theoretical analysis and effectiveness of the control schemes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Energy, Signal Processing and Cyber Security (iSSSC)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Energy, Signal Processing and Cyber Security (iSSSC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/iSSSC56467.2022.10051629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 2nd International Symposium on Sustainable Energy, Signal Processing and Cyber Security (iSSSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iSSSC56467.2022.10051629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在目前的情况下,像太阳能这样的可再生能源是更方便的能源。在并网光伏系统中,保持直流电压稳定和调节电网电流是一个具有挑战性的任务。通过设计双环控制方案克服了这些问题;外部直流电压环,为内部电流环产生参考信号。并网逆变器通过设计高效的电流控制器,将低总谐波失真(THD)的电流注入到光伏系统中。在光伏系统中,通常采用比例积分(PI)控制器、比例谐振(PR)控制器、死拍控制器和滞后电流控制器来调节电网电流。这些控制器在任意一个参考框架中实现,例如;同步(d-q),静止(α-β)或自然(a-b-c)参照系。本文将上述电网电流控制器应用于这三种参考系,并从THD角度评价控制器的稳态性能。简要讨论并比较了各参照系下各种电网电流控制器的优缺点。本文提供了三种不同参考系下的最佳电网电流控制器。最后,给出了两级5.5 kW, 440 V (L-L)三相并网光伏系统的仿真结果,以验证控制方案的理论分析和有效性。
Current Control Structures for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic System
In the present scenario, renewable energy source like solar power is the more convenient source of energy. Sustaining a steady DC link voltage and regulation of grid-current are challenging task in grid-tied photovoltaic (PV) system. These issues are overcome by designing a dual-loop control schemes; outer dc-link voltage loop which generates the reference signal for the inner current loop. The grid-tried inverter is used in photovoltaic (PV) system to inject the current with low total harmonic distortion (THD) into the utility grid by designing the efficient current controller. Generally, proportional-integral (PI) controller, proportional-resonant (PR) controller, dead-beat controller and hysteresis current controller are used in PV system to regulate the grid-current. These controllers are implemented in any one of the reference frames like; synchronous (d-q), stationary (α-β) or natural (a-b-c) reference frame. In this paper, the above-mentioned grid-current controllers are employed in all three reference frames and evaluate the steady-state performance of the controllers in terms of THD. The advantages and disadvantages of all grid-current controllers in each reference frames are briefly discussed and compared. This paper provides the best possible grid-current controller in three different reference frames. Finally, the simulation results from a two-stage 5.5 kW, 440 V (L-L), three-phase grid-tied PV system are provided to confirm the theoretical analysis and effectiveness of the control schemes.