在不同类型的牙周支持下,对连接天然牙的种植体载荷传递的光弹性评估

S. Ozawa, K. Ochiai, A. Caputo, R. Nishimura, Yoshinobu Tanaka
{"title":"在不同类型的牙周支持下,对连接天然牙的种植体载荷传递的光弹性评估","authors":"S. Ozawa, K. Ochiai, A. Caputo, R. Nishimura, Yoshinobu Tanaka","doi":"10.2186/PRP.5.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the stress transfer from a fixed restoration, supported by an implant restored with either a segmented or non-segmented implant abutment, connected to a simulated tooth with decreased foundational support by photoelastic evaluation.Methods: A photoelastic model of a human left mandible, edentulous posterior to the first premolar, was fabricated, with a 3.75×13 mm screw-type implant embedded within the edentulous area. The edentulous areas were restored with a three-unit fixed prosthetic restoration with the distal implant abutment connected to the simulated tooth abutment. The implant abutments consisted of either a segmented conical abutment or a non-segmented UCLA abutment. A hemiseptal periodontal defect was created by the removal of buccal and disto-buccal tissues to simulate decreased support caused by a 4 mm infrabony defect. Vertical occlusal loads were applied at fixed locations on the restorations for the simulated periodontal condition. The stresses which developed in the mandible were monitored photoelastically and recorded photographically.Results: Decrease of the foundational support of the tooth resulted in higher stresses transferred to the mesial and apical aspects of the implant as compared with those in the non-defect control condition. Similar results were obtained for both segmented and nonsegmented abutment restorations.Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, application of load to the simulated abutment teeth with decreased periodontal support resulted in higher stresses around the supporting implant structure for both abutment designs. The distribution and intensity of the stresses were similar for segmented and nonsegmented abutments.","PeriodicalId":306414,"journal":{"name":"Prosthodontic Research & Practice","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photoelastic Evaluation of Load Transfer to an Implant Connected to a Natural Tooth under Varying Types of Periodontal Support\",\"authors\":\"S. Ozawa, K. Ochiai, A. Caputo, R. Nishimura, Yoshinobu Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.2186/PRP.5.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the stress transfer from a fixed restoration, supported by an implant restored with either a segmented or non-segmented implant abutment, connected to a simulated tooth with decreased foundational support by photoelastic evaluation.Methods: A photoelastic model of a human left mandible, edentulous posterior to the first premolar, was fabricated, with a 3.75×13 mm screw-type implant embedded within the edentulous area. The edentulous areas were restored with a three-unit fixed prosthetic restoration with the distal implant abutment connected to the simulated tooth abutment. The implant abutments consisted of either a segmented conical abutment or a non-segmented UCLA abutment. A hemiseptal periodontal defect was created by the removal of buccal and disto-buccal tissues to simulate decreased support caused by a 4 mm infrabony defect. Vertical occlusal loads were applied at fixed locations on the restorations for the simulated periodontal condition. The stresses which developed in the mandible were monitored photoelastically and recorded photographically.Results: Decrease of the foundational support of the tooth resulted in higher stresses transferred to the mesial and apical aspects of the implant as compared with those in the non-defect control condition. Similar results were obtained for both segmented and nonsegmented abutment restorations.Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, application of load to the simulated abutment teeth with decreased periodontal support resulted in higher stresses around the supporting implant structure for both abutment designs. The distribution and intensity of the stresses were similar for segmented and nonsegmented abutments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prosthodontic Research & Practice\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prosthodontic Research & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2186/PRP.5.129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthodontic Research & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/PRP.5.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是通过光弹性评估比较固定修复体的应力传递,固定修复体由有分段或无分段种植体基台修复的种植体支持,与减少基台支持的模拟牙齿连接。方法:制作人左下颌第一前磨牙后无牙光弹模型,在无牙区域内嵌植3.75×13 mm螺钉型种植体。无牙区采用三单元固定修复体修复,远端种植基台与模拟牙基台连接。种植体基牙包括分节的锥形基牙和非分节的UCLA基牙。半下颌牙周缺损是通过去除颊部和颊部分布组织来模拟由4毫米骨下缺损引起的支持减少而产生的。在模拟牙周状况的修复体上固定位置施加垂直咬合负荷。对下颌骨内产生的应力进行光弹性监测和照相记录。结果:与无缺陷控制条件下相比,牙基支持的减少导致种植体中端和尖端应力的增加。对于节段性和非节段性基台修复均获得了相似的结果。结论:在本研究的限制范围内,在减少牙周支持的情况下,对模拟基牙施加载荷会导致两种基牙设计中支撑种植体结构周围的应力升高。分段式和非分段式基台的应力分布和强度相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Photoelastic Evaluation of Load Transfer to an Implant Connected to a Natural Tooth under Varying Types of Periodontal Support
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the stress transfer from a fixed restoration, supported by an implant restored with either a segmented or non-segmented implant abutment, connected to a simulated tooth with decreased foundational support by photoelastic evaluation.Methods: A photoelastic model of a human left mandible, edentulous posterior to the first premolar, was fabricated, with a 3.75×13 mm screw-type implant embedded within the edentulous area. The edentulous areas were restored with a three-unit fixed prosthetic restoration with the distal implant abutment connected to the simulated tooth abutment. The implant abutments consisted of either a segmented conical abutment or a non-segmented UCLA abutment. A hemiseptal periodontal defect was created by the removal of buccal and disto-buccal tissues to simulate decreased support caused by a 4 mm infrabony defect. Vertical occlusal loads were applied at fixed locations on the restorations for the simulated periodontal condition. The stresses which developed in the mandible were monitored photoelastically and recorded photographically.Results: Decrease of the foundational support of the tooth resulted in higher stresses transferred to the mesial and apical aspects of the implant as compared with those in the non-defect control condition. Similar results were obtained for both segmented and nonsegmented abutment restorations.Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, application of load to the simulated abutment teeth with decreased periodontal support resulted in higher stresses around the supporting implant structure for both abutment designs. The distribution and intensity of the stresses were similar for segmented and nonsegmented abutments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信