基于精益的生产力评价指标及其在比较敏捷与瀑布项目中的应用

2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.0-208

K. Jinzenji, Akio Jin, Tatsuya Muramoto

{"title":"基于精益的生产力评价指标及其在比较敏捷与瀑布项目中的应用","authors":"K. Jinzenji, Akio Jin, Tatsuya Muramoto","doi":"10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.0-208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the increasing importance of responding quickly to markets and customers, many organizations that are contracted to develop software are still unable to move from waterfall to agile development. Major reasons include not only the incompatibility of current labor laws with agile development but also the inability to determine the productivity (cost, duration) of agile development. This paper proposes indicators to evaluate and compare the productivity of projects by focusing on \"value building\" in LEAN. To promote agile development, NTT Laboratories have been running agile development trials using delegated agreements (similar to time and material contracts) since 2018. Using the proposed indicators, we compared the statistics of 20 agile trial projects and more than 200 waterfall development projects. Results revealed that agile development became superior to waterfall development in terms of delivery time and cost when its feature-used rate was 30% higher than that of waterfall development.","PeriodicalId":430098,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productivity Evaluation Indicators Based on LEAN and their Application to Compare Agile and Waterfall Projects\",\"authors\":\"K. Jinzenji, Akio Jin, Tatsuya Muramoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.0-208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the increasing importance of responding quickly to markets and customers, many organizations that are contracted to develop software are still unable to move from waterfall to agile development. Major reasons include not only the incompatibility of current labor laws with agile development but also the inability to determine the productivity (cost, duration) of agile development. This paper proposes indicators to evaluate and compare the productivity of projects by focusing on \\\"value building\\\" in LEAN. To promote agile development, NTT Laboratories have been running agile development trials using delegated agreements (similar to time and material contracts) since 2018. Using the proposed indicators, we compared the statistics of 20 agile trial projects and more than 200 waterfall development projects. Results revealed that agile development became superior to waterfall development in terms of delivery time and cost when its feature-used rate was 30% higher than that of waterfall development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.0-208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC48688.2020.0-208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管对市场和客户的快速响应越来越重要，但许多承包软件开发的组织仍然无法从瀑布式开发转向敏捷开发。主要原因不仅包括当前劳动法与敏捷开发的不兼容，还包括无法确定敏捷开发的生产率(成本、持续时间)。本文以精益生产中的“价值建设”为重点，提出了评价和比较项目生产率的指标。为了促进敏捷开发，NTT实验室自2018年以来一直在使用委托协议(类似于时间和材料合同)进行敏捷开发试验。使用提出的指标，我们比较了20个敏捷试验项目和200多个瀑布开发项目的统计数据。结果表明，当敏捷开发的特性使用率比瀑布开发高30%时，敏捷开发在交付时间和成本上都优于瀑布开发。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Productivity Evaluation Indicators Based on LEAN and their Application to Compare Agile and Waterfall Projects

Despite the increasing importance of responding quickly to markets and customers, many organizations that are contracted to develop software are still unable to move from waterfall to agile development. Major reasons include not only the incompatibility of current labor laws with agile development but also the inability to determine the productivity (cost, duration) of agile development. This paper proposes indicators to evaluate and compare the productivity of projects by focusing on "value building" in LEAN. To promote agile development, NTT Laboratories have been running agile development trials using delegated agreements (similar to time and material contracts) since 2018. Using the proposed indicators, we compared the statistics of 20 agile trial projects and more than 200 waterfall development projects. Results revealed that agile development became superior to waterfall development in terms of delivery time and cost when its feature-used rate was 30% higher than that of waterfall development.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)

自引率

0.00%

发文量