{"title":"两比例之差的非迭代置信区间方法","authors":"J. Reed","doi":"10.5580/22e8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction of a confidence interval for the difference between two independent proportions is one of the most basic analyses in statistical inference. The Wald asymptotic methods, with and without a continuity correction have less than nominal coverage probability characteristics but continue to be used in spite of this known poor behavior. For the equal sample size case, the Wald-z coverage probability is subnominal overall. The Wald-c coverage probability always exceeds the nominal level and has interval width larger than Wald-z. For the unequal sample size case, Wald-z is always subnominal while Wald-c exceeds the nominal level. Newcombe's hybrid method and the Agresti-Caffo methods have coverage probabilities that are near nominal for either the equal or unequal sample sizes. Considering the coverage probability criterion, Newcombe's hybrid method and Agresti-Caffo method demonstrate superior coverage properties.","PeriodicalId":247354,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Epidemiology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non Iterative Confidence Interval Methods for the Difference between Two Proportions\",\"authors\":\"J. Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/22e8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The construction of a confidence interval for the difference between two independent proportions is one of the most basic analyses in statistical inference. The Wald asymptotic methods, with and without a continuity correction have less than nominal coverage probability characteristics but continue to be used in spite of this known poor behavior. For the equal sample size case, the Wald-z coverage probability is subnominal overall. The Wald-c coverage probability always exceeds the nominal level and has interval width larger than Wald-z. For the unequal sample size case, Wald-z is always subnominal while Wald-c exceeds the nominal level. Newcombe's hybrid method and the Agresti-Caffo methods have coverage probabilities that are near nominal for either the equal or unequal sample sizes. Considering the coverage probability criterion, Newcombe's hybrid method and Agresti-Caffo method demonstrate superior coverage properties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/22e8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/22e8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non Iterative Confidence Interval Methods for the Difference between Two Proportions
The construction of a confidence interval for the difference between two independent proportions is one of the most basic analyses in statistical inference. The Wald asymptotic methods, with and without a continuity correction have less than nominal coverage probability characteristics but continue to be used in spite of this known poor behavior. For the equal sample size case, the Wald-z coverage probability is subnominal overall. The Wald-c coverage probability always exceeds the nominal level and has interval width larger than Wald-z. For the unequal sample size case, Wald-z is always subnominal while Wald-c exceeds the nominal level. Newcombe's hybrid method and the Agresti-Caffo methods have coverage probabilities that are near nominal for either the equal or unequal sample sizes. Considering the coverage probability criterion, Newcombe's hybrid method and Agresti-Caffo method demonstrate superior coverage properties.