小说和假设作为一种法律写作技巧在继承和由此产生的法律悖论:俄罗斯和普通法的比较分析

Law of succession Pub Date : 2021-03-11 DOI:10.18572/2072-4179-2021-1-12-16

V. Panichkin

{"title":"小说和假设作为一种法律写作技巧在继承和由此产生的法律悖论:俄罗斯和普通法的比较分析","authors":"V. Panichkin","doi":"10.18572/2072-4179-2021-1-12-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the special role of legal fictions and presumptions as the tools of the Succession Law regulation in comparison or Russian and American Law. Author depicts the difference of methods of these instruments use, concerning theories, classifications in relation to succession. The mechanism of legal paradoxes as the consequences of fictions is revealed.","PeriodicalId":226672,"journal":{"name":"Law of succession","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FICTIONS AND PRESUMPTIONS AS A LEGAL WRITING TECHNIQUE IN INHERITANCE AND THE RESULTING LEGAL PARADOXES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIAN AND COMMON LAW\",\"authors\":\"V. Panichkin\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2072-4179-2021-1-12-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the special role of legal fictions and presumptions as the tools of the Succession Law regulation in comparison or Russian and American Law. Author depicts the difference of methods of these instruments use, concerning theories, classifications in relation to succession. The mechanism of legal paradoxes as the consequences of fictions is revealed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law of succession\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law of succession\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4179-2021-1-12-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law of succession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-4179-2021-1-12-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了法律虚构和法律推定作为继承法规制工具在俄美法比较中的特殊作用。作者描述了这些工具使用方法的差异，涉及理论，与演替有关的分类。揭示了法律悖论作为虚构后果的机制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

FICTIONS AND PRESUMPTIONS AS A LEGAL WRITING TECHNIQUE IN INHERITANCE AND THE RESULTING LEGAL PARADOXES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RUSSIAN AND COMMON LAW

The article analyzes the special role of legal fictions and presumptions as the tools of the Succession Law regulation in comparison or Russian and American Law. Author depicts the difference of methods of these instruments use, concerning theories, classifications in relation to succession. The mechanism of legal paradoxes as the consequences of fictions is revealed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Law of succession

自引率

0.00%

发文量