审核及管理评审

O. Laitenberger
{"title":"审核及管理评审","authors":"O. Laitenberger","doi":"10.1081/E-ESE-120044250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software project audits and management reviews are powerful methods to verify that software development efforts are in line with their original budget, time, and quality objectives. In doing so, they usually involve the (manual) evaluation of project, process, or product characteristics to detect discrepancies from planned results. Hence, their focus is clearly on management rather than technical issues, which separates them from more quality-enhancing activities, such as software inspections or formal technical reviews. Since software project audits and management reviews are often conducted by third parties—either independent or in-house—they are in fact decision-making tools; that is, they provide the basis and rationale for more effective management decisions. This entry presents a practical road map to understand the underlying structure and mechanisms of software project audits and management reviews. The road map is primarily driven by practical rather than theoretical considerations and involves six distinct yet important dimensions: purpose, scope, process, participants, timing, and standards. In the context of the road map and the dimensions presented, this entry illustrates and explains software project audits and management reviews and provides some heuristics for their introduction and usage in organizations.","PeriodicalId":386020,"journal":{"name":"Encyclopedia of Software Engineering","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audits and Management Reviews\",\"authors\":\"O. Laitenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1081/E-ESE-120044250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software project audits and management reviews are powerful methods to verify that software development efforts are in line with their original budget, time, and quality objectives. In doing so, they usually involve the (manual) evaluation of project, process, or product characteristics to detect discrepancies from planned results. Hence, their focus is clearly on management rather than technical issues, which separates them from more quality-enhancing activities, such as software inspections or formal technical reviews. Since software project audits and management reviews are often conducted by third parties—either independent or in-house—they are in fact decision-making tools; that is, they provide the basis and rationale for more effective management decisions. This entry presents a practical road map to understand the underlying structure and mechanisms of software project audits and management reviews. The road map is primarily driven by practical rather than theoretical considerations and involves six distinct yet important dimensions: purpose, scope, process, participants, timing, and standards. In the context of the road map and the dimensions presented, this entry illustrates and explains software project audits and management reviews and provides some heuristics for their introduction and usage in organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":386020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Encyclopedia of Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Encyclopedia of Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ESE-120044250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encyclopedia of Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ESE-120044250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软件项目审计和管理评审是验证软件开发工作是否符合其原始预算、时间和质量目标的强大方法。在这样做的过程中,它们通常涉及对项目、过程或产品特性的(手动)评估,以检测计划结果中的差异。因此,他们的焦点显然是在管理而不是技术问题上,这将他们与更多的提高质量的活动分开,例如软件检查或正式的技术审查。由于软件项目审计和管理评审通常是由第三方进行的——要么是独立的,要么是内部的——它们实际上是决策工具;也就是说,它们为更有效的管理决策提供了基础和理由。本条目提供了一个实用的路线图,以了解软件项目审计和管理评审的底层结构和机制。路线图主要是由实际的考虑而不是理论的考虑来驱动的,它包括六个不同但重要的维度:目的、范围、过程、参与者、时间和标准。在路线图和所呈现的维度的上下文中,本条目说明并解释了软件项目审计和管理评审,并为它们在组织中的引入和使用提供了一些启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Audits and Management Reviews
Software project audits and management reviews are powerful methods to verify that software development efforts are in line with their original budget, time, and quality objectives. In doing so, they usually involve the (manual) evaluation of project, process, or product characteristics to detect discrepancies from planned results. Hence, their focus is clearly on management rather than technical issues, which separates them from more quality-enhancing activities, such as software inspections or formal technical reviews. Since software project audits and management reviews are often conducted by third parties—either independent or in-house—they are in fact decision-making tools; that is, they provide the basis and rationale for more effective management decisions. This entry presents a practical road map to understand the underlying structure and mechanisms of software project audits and management reviews. The road map is primarily driven by practical rather than theoretical considerations and involves six distinct yet important dimensions: purpose, scope, process, participants, timing, and standards. In the context of the road map and the dimensions presented, this entry illustrates and explains software project audits and management reviews and provides some heuristics for their introduction and usage in organizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信