{"title":"反驳马克思的劳动剩余理论","authors":"Hak Choi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3803855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proves that Marx had exaggerated labor’s physical and monetary contribution, and that he had told only half of the story. The full story then disproves Marx’s slogan of exploitation and redistribution.<br>","PeriodicalId":176096,"journal":{"name":"Economic History eJournal","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disproving Karl Marx’s Labor Surplus Theory\",\"authors\":\"Hak Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3803855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proves that Marx had exaggerated labor’s physical and monetary contribution, and that he had told only half of the story. The full story then disproves Marx’s slogan of exploitation and redistribution.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":176096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic History eJournal\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic History eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3803855\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3803855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper proves that Marx had exaggerated labor’s physical and monetary contribution, and that he had told only half of the story. The full story then disproves Marx’s slogan of exploitation and redistribution.