央行是如何做出决策的?

IF 1.3 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Francisco Ruge-Murcia
{"title":"央行是如何做出决策的?","authors":"Francisco Ruge-Murcia","doi":"10.1111/caje.12622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper studies decision making by the governing council of the Bank of Canada under two alternative protocols. The protocols are: (i) the median model and (ii) the inclusive-voting model due to Riboni and Ruge-Murcia (2020), where the chair and the median share proposal power. Results show that the data favour a version of the inclusive-voting model where the chair of the committee is moderately inclusive and which endogenously generates the consensus outcome in Riboni and Ruge-Murcia (2010). Decision-making frictions are empirically important in the formulation of monetary policy, and the selected policy is the outcome of a compromise between committee members.</p>","PeriodicalId":47941,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economique","volume":"55 4","pages":"1643-1670"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do central banks make decisions?\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Ruge-Murcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/caje.12622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper studies decision making by the governing council of the Bank of Canada under two alternative protocols. The protocols are: (i) the median model and (ii) the inclusive-voting model due to Riboni and Ruge-Murcia (2020), where the chair and the median share proposal power. Results show that the data favour a version of the inclusive-voting model where the chair of the committee is moderately inclusive and which endogenously generates the consensus outcome in Riboni and Ruge-Murcia (2010). Decision-making frictions are empirically important in the formulation of monetary policy, and the selected policy is the outcome of a compromise between committee members.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economique\",\"volume\":\"55 4\",\"pages\":\"1643-1670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caje.12622\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Economics-Revue Canadienne D Economique","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/caje.12622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了加拿大银行管理委员会在两种替代协议下的决策。协议是:(i)中位数模型和(ii)由Riboni和Ruge-Murcia(2020)提出的包容性投票模型,其中主席和中位数分享提案权力。结果表明,在Riboni和Ruge-Murcia(2010)中,数据支持包容性投票模型的一个版本,其中委员会主席具有适度的包容性,并且内生地产生共识结果。决策摩擦在货币政策的制定过程中具有重要的经验意义,所选择的政策是委员会成员之间妥协的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do central banks make decisions?

This paper studies decision making by the governing council of the Bank of Canada under two alternative protocols. The protocols are: (i) the median model and (ii) the inclusive-voting model due to Riboni and Ruge-Murcia (2020), where the chair and the median share proposal power. Results show that the data favour a version of the inclusive-voting model where the chair of the committee is moderately inclusive and which endogenously generates the consensus outcome in Riboni and Ruge-Murcia (2010). Decision-making frictions are empirically important in the formulation of monetary policy, and the selected policy is the outcome of a compromise between committee members.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Economics (CJE) is the journal of the Canadian Economics Association (CEA) and is the primary academic economics journal based in Canada. The editors seek to maintain and enhance the position of the CJE as a major, internationally recognized journal and are very receptive to high-quality papers on any economics topic from any source. In addition, the editors recognize the Journal"s role as an important outlet for high-quality empirical papers about the Canadian economy and about Canadian policy issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信