专家系统测试方法的比较评价

Shekhar H. Kirani, I. Zualkernan, W. Tsai
{"title":"专家系统测试方法的比较评价","authors":"Shekhar H. Kirani, I. Zualkernan, W. Tsai","doi":"10.1109/TAI.1992.246425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective testing (validation, verification and evaluation) for expert systems is becoming important. A comparative evaluation of black-box, white-box, consistency, and completeness testing methods is performed based on the criteria of effectiveness, robustness, and cost. Testing methods are evaluated using life-cycle mutation testing on a VLSI manufacturing diagnostic expert system. The results indicate that dynamic-flow testing can be used to catch faults in all phases of software development.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":265283,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence TAI '92","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of expert system testing methods\",\"authors\":\"Shekhar H. Kirani, I. Zualkernan, W. Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TAI.1992.246425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effective testing (validation, verification and evaluation) for expert systems is becoming important. A comparative evaluation of black-box, white-box, consistency, and completeness testing methods is performed based on the criteria of effectiveness, robustness, and cost. Testing methods are evaluated using life-cycle mutation testing on a VLSI manufacturing diagnostic expert system. The results indicate that dynamic-flow testing can be used to catch faults in all phases of software development.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":265283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence TAI '92\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence TAI '92\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.1992.246425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Fourth International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence TAI '92","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.1992.246425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

专家系统的有效测试(确认、验证和评估)变得越来越重要。基于有效性、健壮性和成本标准,对黑盒、白盒、一致性和完整性测试方法进行比较评估。利用VLSI制造诊断专家系统的生命周期突变测试对测试方法进行了评估。结果表明,动态流程测试可用于捕获软件开发各个阶段的故障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of expert system testing methods
Effective testing (validation, verification and evaluation) for expert systems is becoming important. A comparative evaluation of black-box, white-box, consistency, and completeness testing methods is performed based on the criteria of effectiveness, robustness, and cost. Testing methods are evaluated using life-cycle mutation testing on a VLSI manufacturing diagnostic expert system. The results indicate that dynamic-flow testing can be used to catch faults in all phases of software development.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信