L. Antunes, M. Bento, M. Sobrinho-Simões, P. Soares, P. Boaventura
{"title":"一项葡萄牙队列研究:儿童头癣放疗后的癌症发病率。","authors":"L. Antunes, M. Bento, M. Sobrinho-Simões, P. Soares, P. Boaventura","doi":"10.1259/bjr.20180677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nOur aim was to compare cancer incidence in a cohort exposed in childhood (1950-63) to a therapeutic dose of radiation in the North of Portugal and followed-up until the end of 2012, with the incidence rates for the same age- and sex in the general population.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA population-based North Region cancer registry (RORENO) was used to assess which members of the cohort developed cancer. The association between radiation exposure and overall and specific cancer sites was evaluated using standardized incidence ratios (SIR).\n\n\nRESULTS\nOver the full follow-up period, 3357 individuals of the 5356 original tinea capitis cohort (63%) were retrieved in the RORENO, and 399 new cancer cases were identified, representing an increased risk of 49% when compared with the general population (SIR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.35-1.64). The risk was slightly higher in males than in females (SIR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.43-1.89 vs SIR = 1.35; CI = 1.17-1.55). The risk was slightly higher in the individuals exposed to a higher radiation dose (SIR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.22-2.51 for ≥630 R vs SIR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.31-1.62 for 325-475 R). In females, there was an excess cancer risk in all cancers with the higher radiation dose (SIR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.21-3.13 for ≥630 R vs SIR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.51 for 325-475 R) which was not observed in males, and for combined dose categories significantly raised SIRs for thyroid and head and neck cancer, suggesting a possible higher radiosensitivity of females. An increase risk was also observed for some cancers located far from the irradiated area.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe results suggest an association between radiation exposure and later increased cancer risk for cancers located near the radiation exposed area, mainly thyroid, and head and neck cancers. Further studies are necessary to disentangle possible non-radiation causes for distant cancers increased risk.\n\n\nADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE\nThis paper shows a possible association between childhood X-ray epilation and increased risk of cancer which was not previously investigated in the Portuguese tinea capitis cohort.","PeriodicalId":226783,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of radiology","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cancer incidence after childhood irradiation for tinea capitis in a portuguese cohort.\",\"authors\":\"L. Antunes, M. Bento, M. Sobrinho-Simões, P. Soares, P. Boaventura\",\"doi\":\"10.1259/bjr.20180677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\nOur aim was to compare cancer incidence in a cohort exposed in childhood (1950-63) to a therapeutic dose of radiation in the North of Portugal and followed-up until the end of 2012, with the incidence rates for the same age- and sex in the general population.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA population-based North Region cancer registry (RORENO) was used to assess which members of the cohort developed cancer. The association between radiation exposure and overall and specific cancer sites was evaluated using standardized incidence ratios (SIR).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOver the full follow-up period, 3357 individuals of the 5356 original tinea capitis cohort (63%) were retrieved in the RORENO, and 399 new cancer cases were identified, representing an increased risk of 49% when compared with the general population (SIR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.35-1.64). The risk was slightly higher in males than in females (SIR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.43-1.89 vs SIR = 1.35; CI = 1.17-1.55). The risk was slightly higher in the individuals exposed to a higher radiation dose (SIR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.22-2.51 for ≥630 R vs SIR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.31-1.62 for 325-475 R). In females, there was an excess cancer risk in all cancers with the higher radiation dose (SIR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.21-3.13 for ≥630 R vs SIR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.51 for 325-475 R) which was not observed in males, and for combined dose categories significantly raised SIRs for thyroid and head and neck cancer, suggesting a possible higher radiosensitivity of females. An increase risk was also observed for some cancers located far from the irradiated area.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe results suggest an association between radiation exposure and later increased cancer risk for cancers located near the radiation exposed area, mainly thyroid, and head and neck cancers. Further studies are necessary to disentangle possible non-radiation causes for distant cancers increased risk.\\n\\n\\nADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE\\nThis paper shows a possible association between childhood X-ray epilation and increased risk of cancer which was not previously investigated in the Portuguese tinea capitis cohort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of radiology\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180677\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的:我们的目的是比较童年时期(1950- 1963年)在葡萄牙北部接受治疗剂量辐射的队列的癌症发病率,并随访至2012年底,与普通人群中相同年龄和性别的发病率进行比较。方法采用以人群为基础的北区癌症登记处(RORENO)来评估队列中哪些成员发生了癌症。使用标准化发病率(SIR)评估辐射暴露与总体和特定癌症部位之间的关系。结果在整个随访期间,在RORENO中检索了5356例原始头癣队列中的3357例(63%),并确定了399例新的癌症病例,与普通人群相比,风险增加了49% (SIR = 1.49;95% ci: 1.35-1.64)。男性的风险略高于女性(SIR = 1.65;95% CI: 1.43-1.89 vs SIR = 1.35;Ci = 1.17-1.55)。暴露于较高辐射剂量的个体的风险略高(SIR = 1.78;≥630的95% CI: 1.22-2.51 R vs SIR = 1.46;95% CI: 1.31-1.62 (325-475 R)。在女性中,高辐射剂量的所有癌症都有额外的癌症风险(SIR = 2.00;≥630的95% CI: 1.21-3.13 R vs SIR = 1.30;95% CI: 1.11-1.51 (325-475 R),在男性中未观察到,并且在联合剂量类别中显著提高甲状腺癌和头颈部癌的SIRs,表明女性可能具有更高的放射敏感性。还观察到远离辐照区域的某些癌症的风险增加。结论:辐射暴露与辐射暴露区附近癌症(主要是甲状腺癌和头颈癌)的后期癌症风险增加有关。进一步的研究是必要的,以解开可能导致远处癌症风险增加的非辐射原因。这篇论文显示了儿童x线脱毛与癌症风险增加之间可能存在的联系,这在葡萄牙头癣队列中以前没有被研究过。
Cancer incidence after childhood irradiation for tinea capitis in a portuguese cohort.
OBJECTIVES
Our aim was to compare cancer incidence in a cohort exposed in childhood (1950-63) to a therapeutic dose of radiation in the North of Portugal and followed-up until the end of 2012, with the incidence rates for the same age- and sex in the general population.
METHODS
A population-based North Region cancer registry (RORENO) was used to assess which members of the cohort developed cancer. The association between radiation exposure and overall and specific cancer sites was evaluated using standardized incidence ratios (SIR).
RESULTS
Over the full follow-up period, 3357 individuals of the 5356 original tinea capitis cohort (63%) were retrieved in the RORENO, and 399 new cancer cases were identified, representing an increased risk of 49% when compared with the general population (SIR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.35-1.64). The risk was slightly higher in males than in females (SIR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.43-1.89 vs SIR = 1.35; CI = 1.17-1.55). The risk was slightly higher in the individuals exposed to a higher radiation dose (SIR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.22-2.51 for ≥630 R vs SIR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.31-1.62 for 325-475 R). In females, there was an excess cancer risk in all cancers with the higher radiation dose (SIR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.21-3.13 for ≥630 R vs SIR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.51 for 325-475 R) which was not observed in males, and for combined dose categories significantly raised SIRs for thyroid and head and neck cancer, suggesting a possible higher radiosensitivity of females. An increase risk was also observed for some cancers located far from the irradiated area.
CONCLUSIONS
The results suggest an association between radiation exposure and later increased cancer risk for cancers located near the radiation exposed area, mainly thyroid, and head and neck cancers. Further studies are necessary to disentangle possible non-radiation causes for distant cancers increased risk.
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE
This paper shows a possible association between childhood X-ray epilation and increased risk of cancer which was not previously investigated in the Portuguese tinea capitis cohort.