便利贴策略对八年级学习障碍学生阅读成绩的影响

R. Deese, Robert W. Spires, D. Paine, J. Cox
{"title":"便利贴策略对八年级学习障碍学生阅读成绩的影响","authors":"R. Deese, Robert W. Spires, D. Paine, J. Cox","doi":"10.20429/becoming.2019.300102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this eight-week research study was to examine the effects of the post-it note intervention on achievement, attitudes, and engagement towards reading comprehension among eighth-grade students with learning disabilities. The participants (N=12) were enrolled in special education, reading class based on their Individualized Education Plans. The students engaged in the think-aloud strategy the first four weeks of the study, and they engaged in the post-it note intervention the second four weeks. Data were collected throughout the study on academic achievement, attitudes toward reading, and engagement. Field notes were collected to analyze major themes of the study. When the data were analyzed, the mean increase from the post-it note intervention was higher than the think-aloud strategy at a statistically significant level (t (11)= -8.44, p<.001). Data showed the students’ attitudes toward reading and engagement improved when 2 Deese et al.: Effects of Post-It Note Strategy Published by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, 2019 they used the post-it note intervention compared to the think-aloud strategy. Reading comprehension is a skill that is necessary for students to master in order to contribute effectively to society (Williams & Ari, 2011). However, students may not be able to master this skill if they are passive readers (Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013). A passive reader is an individual who reads words within a text but does not analyze it for meaningful value (Foster, 2011). Conversely, students who are active readers participate with a text by analyzing it, questioning it, drawing conclusions from it, and making meaningful connections to it for a greater understanding and application (Harvey & Goudvis, 2013). The purpose of the quasi-experimental study was to determine the effects of active reading, specifically utilizing the post-it note strategy, on comprehension among eighthgrade students with learning disabilities. Deficits or difficulties in reading comprehension: National data The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) assesses students in fourth and eighth-grades every two years to determine their reading and math progress (2016). The results are reported on the Nation’s Report Card and the data are aggregated in various ways. The students are placed into one of four categories based on their performance: below basic, basic, proficient, and 3 Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association, Vol. 30 [2019], Iss. 1, Art. 2 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/becoming_journal/vol30/iss1/2 DOI: 10.20429/becoming.2019.300102 advanced. According to the NAEP (2016), only 8% of eighth-grade students with learning disabilities (SWLD) scored proficient on the reading portion of the assessment administered in 2015 and none of them scored in the advanced category. The majority of eighth-grade SWLD scored in the below basic level for the reading assessment with 63% and 29% scored in the basic level. The National Assessment of Educational Progress data for eighth-grade SWLD show that those students are significantly struggling with reading comprehension. Deficits or difficulties in reading comprehension: Research School According to the school improvement plan for the research site, 10% of the population was comprised of students with disabilities. In eighth-grade, there were 31 students with learning disabilities and 30 of those students had Individual Education Plan (IEP) goals addressed for increasing reading comprehension. Overall, the SWLD in the research school struggled with reading comprehension more than any other subject area. According to the research school’s 2015 state testing data, 69% of SWLD scored in the beginning learner category, 28% scored in the developing learner category, 3% scored in the proficient learner category, and 0% scored in the distinguished learner category for reading. In comparison, only 11% of students without disabilities scored in the beginning learner category for reading. The achievement gap in reading between SWLD and non SWLD students was significant enough to be addressed in the form of a goal in the research site’s school improvement plan. 4 Deese et al.: Effects of Post-It Note Strategy Published by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, 2019 Review of Literature Reading comprehension is an area in which students with learning disabilities continuously struggle (Hollenbeck, 2013; Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013; Jitendra & Gajria, 2011; Kim, Linan-Thompson & Misquitta, 2012). Students with learning disabilities perceive and process information differently than students without learning disabilities (Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013). Teaching SWLD explicit strategies to learn comprehension skills is vital because the students are not always able to glean the strategies through inferencing (Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013; Jitendra & Gajria, 2011; Reed & Vaughn, 2012; & Wolff et al., 2013). Students should be actively engaged in reading in order to fully understand and analyze a text (Unrau & Quirk, 2014). Upon reviewing the literature, there was profound emphasis on motivation and engagement in regard to reading comprehension and reading comprehension strategies to utilize with SWLD. Motivation and engagement for reading comprehension Unrau and Quirk (2014) suggested that before teachers implement explicit comprehension strategies, teachers should evaluate students’ motivation and engagement towards reading. The researchers found that motivation and engagement affect comprehension when students read passively or stop when a text is uninteresting. Wolff et al. (2013) agreed with Unrau and Quirk (2014) that motivational factors play a substantial role in reading comprehension, and 5 Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association, Vol. 30 [2019], Iss. 1, Art. 2 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/becoming_journal/vol30/iss1/2 DOI: 10.20429/becoming.2019.300102 furthermore Wolff et al. (2013) suggested that teachers use technology to motivate and engage students in the reading process. Fisher and Frey (2014) conducted a study to examine the effects of motivation on students when they were involved in an after-school intervention for reading comprehension. The intervention was based on close-reading techniques. The results of the study indicated that the students receiving the intervention came to the after-school program more frequently than the students who were not receiving the intervention and showed significant improvements in reading comprehension. Therefore, the researchers proved students should be actively engaged in reading to make sufficient academic progress. Reading comprehension strategies After evaluating and addressing students’ engagement and motivational issues, teachers should teach students avenues to glean meaning from texts they read and provide a framework on ways to do so (Finnegan & Mazin, 2016; Hollenbeck, 2013). Finnegan and Mazin (2016) and Jitendra, Burgess, and Gajria (2011) found that using graphic organizers is an effective instructional strategy for teaching SWLD to make meaningful connections to texts. Jitendra et al. (2011) suggested numerous strategies such as completing study guides, summarizing information, and questioning information to support and increase SWLD interactions with texts. Mahdavi and Tensfeldt (2013) explained that teaching students to use multiple modalities to grapple with a text is essential since all students learn in 6 Deese et al.: Effects of Post-It Note Strategy Published by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, 2019","PeriodicalId":212833,"journal":{"name":"Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the Post-It Note Strategy on Reading Achievement among Eighth-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"R. Deese, Robert W. Spires, D. Paine, J. Cox\",\"doi\":\"10.20429/becoming.2019.300102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this eight-week research study was to examine the effects of the post-it note intervention on achievement, attitudes, and engagement towards reading comprehension among eighth-grade students with learning disabilities. The participants (N=12) were enrolled in special education, reading class based on their Individualized Education Plans. The students engaged in the think-aloud strategy the first four weeks of the study, and they engaged in the post-it note intervention the second four weeks. Data were collected throughout the study on academic achievement, attitudes toward reading, and engagement. Field notes were collected to analyze major themes of the study. When the data were analyzed, the mean increase from the post-it note intervention was higher than the think-aloud strategy at a statistically significant level (t (11)= -8.44, p<.001). Data showed the students’ attitudes toward reading and engagement improved when 2 Deese et al.: Effects of Post-It Note Strategy Published by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, 2019 they used the post-it note intervention compared to the think-aloud strategy. Reading comprehension is a skill that is necessary for students to master in order to contribute effectively to society (Williams & Ari, 2011). However, students may not be able to master this skill if they are passive readers (Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013). A passive reader is an individual who reads words within a text but does not analyze it for meaningful value (Foster, 2011). Conversely, students who are active readers participate with a text by analyzing it, questioning it, drawing conclusions from it, and making meaningful connections to it for a greater understanding and application (Harvey & Goudvis, 2013). The purpose of the quasi-experimental study was to determine the effects of active reading, specifically utilizing the post-it note strategy, on comprehension among eighthgrade students with learning disabilities. Deficits or difficulties in reading comprehension: National data The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) assesses students in fourth and eighth-grades every two years to determine their reading and math progress (2016). The results are reported on the Nation’s Report Card and the data are aggregated in various ways. The students are placed into one of four categories based on their performance: below basic, basic, proficient, and 3 Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association, Vol. 30 [2019], Iss. 1, Art. 2 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/becoming_journal/vol30/iss1/2 DOI: 10.20429/becoming.2019.300102 advanced. According to the NAEP (2016), only 8% of eighth-grade students with learning disabilities (SWLD) scored proficient on the reading portion of the assessment administered in 2015 and none of them scored in the advanced category. The majority of eighth-grade SWLD scored in the below basic level for the reading assessment with 63% and 29% scored in the basic level. The National Assessment of Educational Progress data for eighth-grade SWLD show that those students are significantly struggling with reading comprehension. Deficits or difficulties in reading comprehension: Research School According to the school improvement plan for the research site, 10% of the population was comprised of students with disabilities. In eighth-grade, there were 31 students with learning disabilities and 30 of those students had Individual Education Plan (IEP) goals addressed for increasing reading comprehension. Overall, the SWLD in the research school struggled with reading comprehension more than any other subject area. According to the research school’s 2015 state testing data, 69% of SWLD scored in the beginning learner category, 28% scored in the developing learner category, 3% scored in the proficient learner category, and 0% scored in the distinguished learner category for reading. In comparison, only 11% of students without disabilities scored in the beginning learner category for reading. The achievement gap in reading between SWLD and non SWLD students was significant enough to be addressed in the form of a goal in the research site’s school improvement plan. 4 Deese et al.: Effects of Post-It Note Strategy Published by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, 2019 Review of Literature Reading comprehension is an area in which students with learning disabilities continuously struggle (Hollenbeck, 2013; Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013; Jitendra & Gajria, 2011; Kim, Linan-Thompson & Misquitta, 2012). Students with learning disabilities perceive and process information differently than students without learning disabilities (Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013). Teaching SWLD explicit strategies to learn comprehension skills is vital because the students are not always able to glean the strategies through inferencing (Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013; Jitendra & Gajria, 2011; Reed & Vaughn, 2012; & Wolff et al., 2013). Students should be actively engaged in reading in order to fully understand and analyze a text (Unrau & Quirk, 2014). Upon reviewing the literature, there was profound emphasis on motivation and engagement in regard to reading comprehension and reading comprehension strategies to utilize with SWLD. Motivation and engagement for reading comprehension Unrau and Quirk (2014) suggested that before teachers implement explicit comprehension strategies, teachers should evaluate students’ motivation and engagement towards reading. The researchers found that motivation and engagement affect comprehension when students read passively or stop when a text is uninteresting. Wolff et al. (2013) agreed with Unrau and Quirk (2014) that motivational factors play a substantial role in reading comprehension, and 5 Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association, Vol. 30 [2019], Iss. 1, Art. 2 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/becoming_journal/vol30/iss1/2 DOI: 10.20429/becoming.2019.300102 furthermore Wolff et al. (2013) suggested that teachers use technology to motivate and engage students in the reading process. Fisher and Frey (2014) conducted a study to examine the effects of motivation on students when they were involved in an after-school intervention for reading comprehension. The intervention was based on close-reading techniques. The results of the study indicated that the students receiving the intervention came to the after-school program more frequently than the students who were not receiving the intervention and showed significant improvements in reading comprehension. Therefore, the researchers proved students should be actively engaged in reading to make sufficient academic progress. Reading comprehension strategies After evaluating and addressing students’ engagement and motivational issues, teachers should teach students avenues to glean meaning from texts they read and provide a framework on ways to do so (Finnegan & Mazin, 2016; Hollenbeck, 2013). Finnegan and Mazin (2016) and Jitendra, Burgess, and Gajria (2011) found that using graphic organizers is an effective instructional strategy for teaching SWLD to make meaningful connections to texts. Jitendra et al. (2011) suggested numerous strategies such as completing study guides, summarizing information, and questioning information to support and increase SWLD interactions with texts. Mahdavi and Tensfeldt (2013) explained that teaching students to use multiple modalities to grapple with a text is essential since all students learn in 6 Deese et al.: Effects of Post-It Note Strategy Published by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, 2019\",\"PeriodicalId\":212833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20429/becoming.2019.300102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20429/becoming.2019.300102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究为期八周,目的是探讨便利贴干预对八年级学习障碍学生的成绩、态度和阅读理解投入的影响。参与者(N=12)根据他们的个性化教育计划参加特殊教育,阅读班。在研究的前四周,学生们采用了“大声思考”策略,在接下来的四周,他们采用了即时贴干预。在整个研究过程中收集了有关学业成绩、阅读态度和参与度的数据。收集了实地记录以分析研究的主要主题。当对数据进行分析时,便利贴干预的平均增加高于出声思考策略,且具有统计学意义(t (11)= -8.44, p<.001)。数据显示,当2 Deese等人:Post-It Note策略的影响(Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, 2019)与有声思考策略相比,他们使用Post-It Note干预时,学生对阅读和参与的态度有所改善。为了有效地为社会做出贡献,阅读理解是学生必须掌握的一项技能(Williams & Ari, 2011)。然而,如果学生是被动的读者,他们可能无法掌握这一技能(Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013)。被动读者是指阅读文本中的单词,但不分析文本的有意义价值的人(Foster, 2011)。相反,积极阅读的学生通过分析文本,质疑文本,从中得出结论,并与文本建立有意义的联系以更好地理解和应用文本来参与文本(Harvey & Goudvis, 2013)。本研究旨在探讨主动阅读,特别是便利贴策略对八年级学习障碍学生阅读理解能力的影响。国家教育进步评估(NAEP)每两年对四年级和八年级的学生进行评估,以确定他们的阅读和数学进步(2016年)。结果被报告在国家报告卡上,数据以各种方式汇总。学生根据他们的表现分为四类之一:低于基本,基本,精通和3成为:乔治亚中学协会杂志,第30卷[2019],Iss. 1, Art. 2 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/becoming_journal/vol30/iss1/2 DOI: 10.20429/ Becoming .2019.300102 advanced。根据NAEP(2016),在2015年进行的评估中,只有8%的八年级学习障碍学生(SWLD)在阅读部分得分熟练,而且没有一个人得分在高级类别。大多数八年级学生的阅读测试得分低于基本水平,其中63%和29%的学生的阅读测试得分低于基本水平。国家教育进步评估数据显示,这些学生在阅读理解上有明显的困难。阅读理解的缺陷或困难:研究学校根据研究地点的学校改善计划,10%的人口由残疾学生组成。在八年级,有31名学生有学习障碍,其中30名学生有个人教育计划(IEP)的目标,以提高阅读理解能力。总的来说,研究学院的SWLD在阅读理解方面比任何其他学科领域都要困难。根据研究学院2015年的州测试数据,69%的SWLD在初级学习者类别中得分,28%在发展学习者类别中得分,3%在熟练学习者类别中得分,0%在阅读杰出学习者类别中得分。相比之下,只有11%的非残疾学生在阅读的初级学习者类别中得分。SWLD学生和非SWLD学生在阅读方面的成绩差距非常显著,足以在研究地点的学校改进计划中以目标的形式加以解决。4 Deese等人:Digital Commons@Georgia Southern出版的Post-It Note策略的效果,2019 Review of Literature阅读理解是学习障碍学生持续挣扎的领域(Hollenbeck, 2013;Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013;Jitendra & Gajria, 2011;Kim, Linan-Thompson & misquita, 2012)。有学习障碍的学生对信息的感知和处理与没有学习障碍的学生不同(Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013)。教授SWLD明确的策略来学习理解技能是至关重要的,因为学生并不总是能够通过推理收集策略(Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013;Jitendra & Gajria, 2011;Reed & Vaughn, 2012;& Wolff et al., 2013)。 为了充分理解和分析文本,学生应该积极参与阅读(Unrau & Quirk, 2014)。通过对文献的回顾,我们发现在阅读理解和阅读理解策略方面,对动机和参与有着深刻的重视。Unrau和Quirk(2014)认为,在教师实施外显理解策略之前,教师应该评估学生的阅读动机和参与程度。研究人员发现,当学生被动阅读或在文本无趣时停下来时,动机和投入会影响理解。Wolff et al.(2013)同意Unrau和Quirk(2014)的观点,即动机因素在阅读理解中起着重要作用,5 Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association, Vol. 30 [2019], Iss. 1, Art. 2 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/becoming_journal/vol30/iss1/2 DOI: 10.20429/ Becoming .2019.300102此外,Wolff et al.(2013)建议教师使用技术来激励和吸引学生参与阅读过程。Fisher和Frey(2014)进行了一项研究,研究动机对学生参与课外阅读理解干预时的影响。干预是基于近距离阅读技术。研究结果表明,接受干预的学生比未接受干预的学生更频繁地参加课外活动,并在阅读理解方面表现出显著的改善。因此,研究人员证明,学生应该积极参与阅读,以取得足够的学业进步。在评估和解决学生的参与和动机问题之后,教师应该教学生从他们阅读的文本中收集意义的途径,并提供一个方法框架(Finnegan & Mazin, 2016;曹国雄,2013)。Finnegan和Mazin(2016)以及Jitendra、Burgess和Gajria(2011)发现,使用图形组织者是一种有效的教学策略,可以在SWLD教学中与文本建立有意义的联系。Jitendra等人(2011)提出了许多策略,如完成学习指南、总结信息和质疑信息,以支持和增加SWLD与文本的互动。Mahdavi和Tensfeldt(2013)解释说,教学生使用多种方式来处理文本是必不可少的,因为所有学生都在学习6 Deese等人:Post-It Note策略的影响,由Digital Commons@Georgia Southern出版,2019
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of the Post-It Note Strategy on Reading Achievement among Eighth-Grade Students with Learning Disabilities
The purpose of this eight-week research study was to examine the effects of the post-it note intervention on achievement, attitudes, and engagement towards reading comprehension among eighth-grade students with learning disabilities. The participants (N=12) were enrolled in special education, reading class based on their Individualized Education Plans. The students engaged in the think-aloud strategy the first four weeks of the study, and they engaged in the post-it note intervention the second four weeks. Data were collected throughout the study on academic achievement, attitudes toward reading, and engagement. Field notes were collected to analyze major themes of the study. When the data were analyzed, the mean increase from the post-it note intervention was higher than the think-aloud strategy at a statistically significant level (t (11)= -8.44, p<.001). Data showed the students’ attitudes toward reading and engagement improved when 2 Deese et al.: Effects of Post-It Note Strategy Published by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, 2019 they used the post-it note intervention compared to the think-aloud strategy. Reading comprehension is a skill that is necessary for students to master in order to contribute effectively to society (Williams & Ari, 2011). However, students may not be able to master this skill if they are passive readers (Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013). A passive reader is an individual who reads words within a text but does not analyze it for meaningful value (Foster, 2011). Conversely, students who are active readers participate with a text by analyzing it, questioning it, drawing conclusions from it, and making meaningful connections to it for a greater understanding and application (Harvey & Goudvis, 2013). The purpose of the quasi-experimental study was to determine the effects of active reading, specifically utilizing the post-it note strategy, on comprehension among eighthgrade students with learning disabilities. Deficits or difficulties in reading comprehension: National data The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) assesses students in fourth and eighth-grades every two years to determine their reading and math progress (2016). The results are reported on the Nation’s Report Card and the data are aggregated in various ways. The students are placed into one of four categories based on their performance: below basic, basic, proficient, and 3 Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association, Vol. 30 [2019], Iss. 1, Art. 2 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/becoming_journal/vol30/iss1/2 DOI: 10.20429/becoming.2019.300102 advanced. According to the NAEP (2016), only 8% of eighth-grade students with learning disabilities (SWLD) scored proficient on the reading portion of the assessment administered in 2015 and none of them scored in the advanced category. The majority of eighth-grade SWLD scored in the below basic level for the reading assessment with 63% and 29% scored in the basic level. The National Assessment of Educational Progress data for eighth-grade SWLD show that those students are significantly struggling with reading comprehension. Deficits or difficulties in reading comprehension: Research School According to the school improvement plan for the research site, 10% of the population was comprised of students with disabilities. In eighth-grade, there were 31 students with learning disabilities and 30 of those students had Individual Education Plan (IEP) goals addressed for increasing reading comprehension. Overall, the SWLD in the research school struggled with reading comprehension more than any other subject area. According to the research school’s 2015 state testing data, 69% of SWLD scored in the beginning learner category, 28% scored in the developing learner category, 3% scored in the proficient learner category, and 0% scored in the distinguished learner category for reading. In comparison, only 11% of students without disabilities scored in the beginning learner category for reading. The achievement gap in reading between SWLD and non SWLD students was significant enough to be addressed in the form of a goal in the research site’s school improvement plan. 4 Deese et al.: Effects of Post-It Note Strategy Published by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, 2019 Review of Literature Reading comprehension is an area in which students with learning disabilities continuously struggle (Hollenbeck, 2013; Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013; Jitendra & Gajria, 2011; Kim, Linan-Thompson & Misquitta, 2012). Students with learning disabilities perceive and process information differently than students without learning disabilities (Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013). Teaching SWLD explicit strategies to learn comprehension skills is vital because the students are not always able to glean the strategies through inferencing (Hughes & Parker-Katz, 2013; Jitendra & Gajria, 2011; Reed & Vaughn, 2012; & Wolff et al., 2013). Students should be actively engaged in reading in order to fully understand and analyze a text (Unrau & Quirk, 2014). Upon reviewing the literature, there was profound emphasis on motivation and engagement in regard to reading comprehension and reading comprehension strategies to utilize with SWLD. Motivation and engagement for reading comprehension Unrau and Quirk (2014) suggested that before teachers implement explicit comprehension strategies, teachers should evaluate students’ motivation and engagement towards reading. The researchers found that motivation and engagement affect comprehension when students read passively or stop when a text is uninteresting. Wolff et al. (2013) agreed with Unrau and Quirk (2014) that motivational factors play a substantial role in reading comprehension, and 5 Becoming: Journal of the Georgia Middle School Association, Vol. 30 [2019], Iss. 1, Art. 2 https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/becoming_journal/vol30/iss1/2 DOI: 10.20429/becoming.2019.300102 furthermore Wolff et al. (2013) suggested that teachers use technology to motivate and engage students in the reading process. Fisher and Frey (2014) conducted a study to examine the effects of motivation on students when they were involved in an after-school intervention for reading comprehension. The intervention was based on close-reading techniques. The results of the study indicated that the students receiving the intervention came to the after-school program more frequently than the students who were not receiving the intervention and showed significant improvements in reading comprehension. Therefore, the researchers proved students should be actively engaged in reading to make sufficient academic progress. Reading comprehension strategies After evaluating and addressing students’ engagement and motivational issues, teachers should teach students avenues to glean meaning from texts they read and provide a framework on ways to do so (Finnegan & Mazin, 2016; Hollenbeck, 2013). Finnegan and Mazin (2016) and Jitendra, Burgess, and Gajria (2011) found that using graphic organizers is an effective instructional strategy for teaching SWLD to make meaningful connections to texts. Jitendra et al. (2011) suggested numerous strategies such as completing study guides, summarizing information, and questioning information to support and increase SWLD interactions with texts. Mahdavi and Tensfeldt (2013) explained that teaching students to use multiple modalities to grapple with a text is essential since all students learn in 6 Deese et al.: Effects of Post-It Note Strategy Published by Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, 2019
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信