{"title":"学术金融范式多元化研究","authors":"Sheikh Tanzila Deepty, Saud Ahmed","doi":"10.3329/dujbst.v42i1.59960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic finance research is largely overshadowed by functionalist paradigm, and this limit positive contribution to knowledge. Hence, finance literature faces criticism, which highlights the justification of having a diversified philosophical stance. By investigating contemporary papers on investment benchmarks, sustainable finance and behavioural finance, we identify that modern finance researchers are rethinking about the research paradigm to bring paradigmatic diversification rather than being stagnant to positivism.\nJournal of Business Studies, Vol. XLII, No. 1, April 2021 Page 59-72","PeriodicalId":308364,"journal":{"name":"Dhaka University Journal of Business Studies","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Search of Paradigmatic Diversification in Academic Finance\",\"authors\":\"Sheikh Tanzila Deepty, Saud Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/dujbst.v42i1.59960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic finance research is largely overshadowed by functionalist paradigm, and this limit positive contribution to knowledge. Hence, finance literature faces criticism, which highlights the justification of having a diversified philosophical stance. By investigating contemporary papers on investment benchmarks, sustainable finance and behavioural finance, we identify that modern finance researchers are rethinking about the research paradigm to bring paradigmatic diversification rather than being stagnant to positivism.\\nJournal of Business Studies, Vol. XLII, No. 1, April 2021 Page 59-72\",\"PeriodicalId\":308364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dhaka University Journal of Business Studies\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dhaka University Journal of Business Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbst.v42i1.59960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dhaka University Journal of Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbst.v42i1.59960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In Search of Paradigmatic Diversification in Academic Finance
Academic finance research is largely overshadowed by functionalist paradigm, and this limit positive contribution to knowledge. Hence, finance literature faces criticism, which highlights the justification of having a diversified philosophical stance. By investigating contemporary papers on investment benchmarks, sustainable finance and behavioural finance, we identify that modern finance researchers are rethinking about the research paradigm to bring paradigmatic diversification rather than being stagnant to positivism.
Journal of Business Studies, Vol. XLII, No. 1, April 2021 Page 59-72
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
