尼日利亚人改良与未改良电惊厥治疗血流动力学反应的比较效果。

B. Bolaji, F. Omosofe, I. Kolawole, A. B. Makanjuola
{"title":"尼日利亚人改良与未改良电惊厥治疗血流动力学反应的比较效果。","authors":"B. Bolaji, F. Omosofe, I. Kolawole, A. B. Makanjuola","doi":"10.5580/2bb2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) provokes abrupt changes in systemic haemodynamics. We compared the effects of modified (propofol and thiopentone) versus unmodified ECT on haemodynamic responses of patients scheduled for ECT in two Nigerian tertiary hospitals between September 2008 and March 2009.Methods: In a prospective, randomized study, sixty patients slated for ECT were allocated to unmodified (UG), thiopentone (TG) and propofol (PG) groups with twenty in each group. Anaesthesia was induced with either 1mg/kg propofol (PG) or 5mg/kg thiopentone (TG) and 0.5mg/kg suxamethonium. Anaesthesia was not administered to UG. Blood pressure, systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before ECT and at 1 and 5 minutes after seizure had ended. The means of the post and pre ictal haemodynamic parameters and increases in means were compared. Results: Mean HR and SBP decreased significantly at 1 min in the modified group and increased significantly at 5 min. The mean HR increased significantly in both modified groups at 1 and 5 min. Mean SBP and DBP increased significantly at 5 min in the modified group and insignificantly in both modified groups. Increase in MAP was significant in TG (p = 0.028). Though the increase in SBP was not significant in modified groups, it was significantly greater in the TG than PG (p = 0.012) Conclusion: Modified ECT may not be commonly practiced in our environment because of dearth of qualified anaesthetists. This study has shown that modified ECT minimizes increases in haemodynamic response when compared with unmodified ECT. Propofol at 1 mg/kg minimized increases in DPB and MAP more than thiopentone 5 mg/kg. Propofol with rapid recovery profile is suitable for modified ECT in Nigerian patients.","PeriodicalId":396781,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Effects Of The Haemodynamic Responses Of Modified Versus Unmodified Electroconvulsive Therapy In Nigerians.\",\"authors\":\"B. Bolaji, F. Omosofe, I. Kolawole, A. B. Makanjuola\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/2bb2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) provokes abrupt changes in systemic haemodynamics. We compared the effects of modified (propofol and thiopentone) versus unmodified ECT on haemodynamic responses of patients scheduled for ECT in two Nigerian tertiary hospitals between September 2008 and March 2009.Methods: In a prospective, randomized study, sixty patients slated for ECT were allocated to unmodified (UG), thiopentone (TG) and propofol (PG) groups with twenty in each group. Anaesthesia was induced with either 1mg/kg propofol (PG) or 5mg/kg thiopentone (TG) and 0.5mg/kg suxamethonium. Anaesthesia was not administered to UG. Blood pressure, systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before ECT and at 1 and 5 minutes after seizure had ended. The means of the post and pre ictal haemodynamic parameters and increases in means were compared. Results: Mean HR and SBP decreased significantly at 1 min in the modified group and increased significantly at 5 min. The mean HR increased significantly in both modified groups at 1 and 5 min. Mean SBP and DBP increased significantly at 5 min in the modified group and insignificantly in both modified groups. Increase in MAP was significant in TG (p = 0.028). Though the increase in SBP was not significant in modified groups, it was significantly greater in the TG than PG (p = 0.012) Conclusion: Modified ECT may not be commonly practiced in our environment because of dearth of qualified anaesthetists. This study has shown that modified ECT minimizes increases in haemodynamic response when compared with unmodified ECT. Propofol at 1 mg/kg minimized increases in DPB and MAP more than thiopentone 5 mg/kg. Propofol with rapid recovery profile is suitable for modified ECT in Nigerian patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":396781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/2bb2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2bb2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:电痉挛治疗(ECT)引起全身血流动力学的突变。我们比较了改良的(异丙酚和硫喷酮)与未改良的电痉挛疗法对2008年9月至2009年3月在尼日利亚两家三级医院安排电痉挛疗法患者血流动力学反应的影响。方法:在一项前瞻性随机研究中,60例计划进行ECT的患者被分配到未修饰组(UG)、硫喷妥酮组(TG)和异丙酚组(PG),每组20例。麻醉剂量分别为1mg/kg异丙酚(PG)或5mg/kg硫喷妥酮(TG)和0.5mg/kg磺胺甲铵。UG未麻醉。在ECT前及癫痫发作结束后1分钟和5分钟分别记录血压、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)和心率(HR)。比较前后血流动力学参数的平均值及平均值的增加情况。结果:改良组的平均HR和收缩压在1 min时显著降低,在5 min时显著升高。改良组的平均HR在1 min和5 min时显著升高。改良组的平均收缩压和舒张压在5 min时显著升高,改良组和改良组均无显著升高。TG组MAP明显升高(p = 0.028)。改良组收缩压升高不明显,TG组收缩压升高明显高于PG组(p = 0.012)结论:由于缺乏合格的麻醉师,改良电痉挛术在我国尚不能普遍应用。这项研究表明,与未经改良的电痉挛疗法相比,改良电痉挛疗法使血流动力学反应的增加最小化。1mg /kg的异丙酚比5mg /kg的硫喷妥酮更能减少DPB和MAP的增加。异丙酚具有快速恢复的特点,适用于尼日利亚患者改良电痉挛治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Effects Of The Haemodynamic Responses Of Modified Versus Unmodified Electroconvulsive Therapy In Nigerians.
Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) provokes abrupt changes in systemic haemodynamics. We compared the effects of modified (propofol and thiopentone) versus unmodified ECT on haemodynamic responses of patients scheduled for ECT in two Nigerian tertiary hospitals between September 2008 and March 2009.Methods: In a prospective, randomized study, sixty patients slated for ECT were allocated to unmodified (UG), thiopentone (TG) and propofol (PG) groups with twenty in each group. Anaesthesia was induced with either 1mg/kg propofol (PG) or 5mg/kg thiopentone (TG) and 0.5mg/kg suxamethonium. Anaesthesia was not administered to UG. Blood pressure, systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before ECT and at 1 and 5 minutes after seizure had ended. The means of the post and pre ictal haemodynamic parameters and increases in means were compared. Results: Mean HR and SBP decreased significantly at 1 min in the modified group and increased significantly at 5 min. The mean HR increased significantly in both modified groups at 1 and 5 min. Mean SBP and DBP increased significantly at 5 min in the modified group and insignificantly in both modified groups. Increase in MAP was significant in TG (p = 0.028). Though the increase in SBP was not significant in modified groups, it was significantly greater in the TG than PG (p = 0.012) Conclusion: Modified ECT may not be commonly practiced in our environment because of dearth of qualified anaesthetists. This study has shown that modified ECT minimizes increases in haemodynamic response when compared with unmodified ECT. Propofol at 1 mg/kg minimized increases in DPB and MAP more than thiopentone 5 mg/kg. Propofol with rapid recovery profile is suitable for modified ECT in Nigerian patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信