{"title":"代表性和异质因子:理论和证据","authors":"Yosef Bonaparte","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.905902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the theoretical and empirical findings for representative and heterogeneous agents for a host of economic issues including market completeness, consumption growth variability, income risk, equilibrium interest rate, and welfare gains from eliminating a Real Business Cycle (RBC). We introduce three types of heterogeneity: state, preferences, and beliefs and show that in some cases the heterogeneous agent framework can be viewed as complementary to the representative agent, whereas in other cases it can be seen as a substitute.","PeriodicalId":170505,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics eJournal","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representative and Heterogeneous Agents: Theory and Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Yosef Bonaparte\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.905902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the theoretical and empirical findings for representative and heterogeneous agents for a host of economic issues including market completeness, consumption growth variability, income risk, equilibrium interest rate, and welfare gains from eliminating a Real Business Cycle (RBC). We introduce three types of heterogeneity: state, preferences, and beliefs and show that in some cases the heterogeneous agent framework can be viewed as complementary to the representative agent, whereas in other cases it can be seen as a substitute.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.905902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.905902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Representative and Heterogeneous Agents: Theory and Evidence
This paper analyzes the theoretical and empirical findings for representative and heterogeneous agents for a host of economic issues including market completeness, consumption growth variability, income risk, equilibrium interest rate, and welfare gains from eliminating a Real Business Cycle (RBC). We introduce three types of heterogeneity: state, preferences, and beliefs and show that in some cases the heterogeneous agent framework can be viewed as complementary to the representative agent, whereas in other cases it can be seen as a substitute.