{"title":"乳腺癌。筛选。","authors":"N D Rodes, C W Blackwell, C Farrell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Screening is a more complicated issue than has been indicated in this chapter. Long-term followup is essential to exclude misleading initial impressions, and survival predictions must stand this test. The problem of interval cancers must be acknowledged, and methods of developing more cost-effective systems that might provide even broader coverage of the population at risk have to be considered. Suffice it to say that mass screening for breast cancer can be accomplished. Large numbers of American women are sufficiently concerned about this disease to participate, as evidenced by the success of the National Cancer Institute/American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects. It has been demonstrated that breast cancers so small that they would previously be considered a pathological curiosity are detected with surprising frequency. The ultimate effect on survival time by this screening can of course only be determined after passage of time, but there is every reason to believe that it represents one of the really great advances in detection-diagnosis in recent history. The chief detection modality is mammography, and it is to be expected that technological advances in this area will permit images of even greater reliability and resolution at a level of radiation exposure that will be acceptable to everyone. The definitive role of thermography in detection of breast disease has yet to be fully determined. The maximal scientific benefit and the true impact of the screening demonstration projects will be realized only after long-term followup of the 280,000 participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":74099,"journal":{"name":"Major problems in clinical surgery","volume":"5 ","pages":"91-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cancer of the breast. Screening.\",\"authors\":\"N D Rodes, C W Blackwell, C Farrell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Screening is a more complicated issue than has been indicated in this chapter. Long-term followup is essential to exclude misleading initial impressions, and survival predictions must stand this test. The problem of interval cancers must be acknowledged, and methods of developing more cost-effective systems that might provide even broader coverage of the population at risk have to be considered. Suffice it to say that mass screening for breast cancer can be accomplished. Large numbers of American women are sufficiently concerned about this disease to participate, as evidenced by the success of the National Cancer Institute/American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects. It has been demonstrated that breast cancers so small that they would previously be considered a pathological curiosity are detected with surprising frequency. The ultimate effect on survival time by this screening can of course only be determined after passage of time, but there is every reason to believe that it represents one of the really great advances in detection-diagnosis in recent history. The chief detection modality is mammography, and it is to be expected that technological advances in this area will permit images of even greater reliability and resolution at a level of radiation exposure that will be acceptable to everyone. The definitive role of thermography in detection of breast disease has yet to be fully determined. The maximal scientific benefit and the true impact of the screening demonstration projects will be realized only after long-term followup of the 280,000 participants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Major problems in clinical surgery\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"91-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Major problems in clinical surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Major problems in clinical surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Screening is a more complicated issue than has been indicated in this chapter. Long-term followup is essential to exclude misleading initial impressions, and survival predictions must stand this test. The problem of interval cancers must be acknowledged, and methods of developing more cost-effective systems that might provide even broader coverage of the population at risk have to be considered. Suffice it to say that mass screening for breast cancer can be accomplished. Large numbers of American women are sufficiently concerned about this disease to participate, as evidenced by the success of the National Cancer Institute/American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects. It has been demonstrated that breast cancers so small that they would previously be considered a pathological curiosity are detected with surprising frequency. The ultimate effect on survival time by this screening can of course only be determined after passage of time, but there is every reason to believe that it represents one of the really great advances in detection-diagnosis in recent history. The chief detection modality is mammography, and it is to be expected that technological advances in this area will permit images of even greater reliability and resolution at a level of radiation exposure that will be acceptable to everyone. The definitive role of thermography in detection of breast disease has yet to be fully determined. The maximal scientific benefit and the true impact of the screening demonstration projects will be realized only after long-term followup of the 280,000 participants.