自然资源产权制度和权利的多样性

D. Cole, E. Ostrom
{"title":"自然资源产权制度和权利的多样性","authors":"D. Cole, E. Ostrom","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1656418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Property theory has not kept pace with the growth of empirical and historical information on property systems. This paper, prepared for a Lincoln Institute conference on \"The Evolution of Property Systems and Rights Related to Land and Natural Resources\": (a) introduces conventional theories of property rights in natural resources (based largely on Hardin 1968 and Demsetz 1967); (b) addresses issues in the construction and meaning of property rights and systems; (c) describes the findings of social scientists from decades of field and experimental research about the structure and performance of existing property systems; and (d) calls on property scholars to move beyond \"naive\" and simplistic theories of property rights in light of the wealth of empirical evidence demonstrating the variety of successful property regimes in use.","PeriodicalId":346805,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Variety of Property Systems and Rights in Natural Resources\",\"authors\":\"D. Cole, E. Ostrom\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1656418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Property theory has not kept pace with the growth of empirical and historical information on property systems. This paper, prepared for a Lincoln Institute conference on \\\"The Evolution of Property Systems and Rights Related to Land and Natural Resources\\\": (a) introduces conventional theories of property rights in natural resources (based largely on Hardin 1968 and Demsetz 1967); (b) addresses issues in the construction and meaning of property rights and systems; (c) describes the findings of social scientists from decades of field and experimental research about the structure and performance of existing property systems; and (d) calls on property scholars to move beyond \\\"naive\\\" and simplistic theories of property rights in light of the wealth of empirical evidence demonstrating the variety of successful property regimes in use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1656418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1656418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

摘要

产权理论没有跟上关于产权制度的经验和历史信息的增长。这篇论文是为林肯研究所关于“与土地和自然资源有关的产权制度和权利的演变”的会议准备的:(a)介绍了自然资源产权的传统理论(主要基于哈丁1968年和德姆塞茨1967年);(b)讨论产权和制度的构建和含义方面的问题;(c)描述社会科学家对现有财产制度的结构和性能进行了数十年的实地和实验研究的结果;(d)呼吁财产学者根据大量的经验证据,超越“天真的”和简单的产权理论,这些经验证据表明,在使用中有各种成功的财产制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Variety of Property Systems and Rights in Natural Resources
Property theory has not kept pace with the growth of empirical and historical information on property systems. This paper, prepared for a Lincoln Institute conference on "The Evolution of Property Systems and Rights Related to Land and Natural Resources": (a) introduces conventional theories of property rights in natural resources (based largely on Hardin 1968 and Demsetz 1967); (b) addresses issues in the construction and meaning of property rights and systems; (c) describes the findings of social scientists from decades of field and experimental research about the structure and performance of existing property systems; and (d) calls on property scholars to move beyond "naive" and simplistic theories of property rights in light of the wealth of empirical evidence demonstrating the variety of successful property regimes in use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信