高等教育中的平权行动:诉讼、招生和多样性研究的最新进展
引用次数: 5
摘要
即平权行动诉讼更新 ................................................................174 A。当前景观和介入者的角色 .................................174 b·格拉特案的裁决:密歇根大学法学院 ............................176年1。审判法院的裁决在大学的案例:多样性不是C om佩林的兴趣 ............................................................................176我)。事实的发现 ..........................................................................176(二)巴克和多样性的问题 ......................................................178 iii)多样性和教育福利 .............................................179(四)N箭头裁剪 .......................................................................179 2。沉默的格拉特案的裁决介入者:偏见和D iscrim信息的模糊问题 ....................................................................................社会歧视?..............................................................180 ii)在标准化测试中存在偏见的证据 ...................................181 iii)初审法院发现测试 ..................................................185年本科成绩(四)偏见的证据:气候R esearch校园 ......................................................................................186 v)初审法庭对校园气候研究的调查结果....................187(六)其他组件干涉者的情况 ................................188 3。试验后D evelopm树人 ......................................................................190 c·格拉茨:密歇根大学的本科 .........................190年1。大学赢得部分即决判决 .....................................190 2。介入者失去补救原理 ...............................D.华盛顿大学法学院和倡议-200 .................195年1。第九巡回法院规则,多样性是引人注目的 ...............................196 e .第五巡回法庭的裁决Hopwoodll和III ...................................197年1。草木的简要概述 // ...........................................................197 2。最近的事态发展:Hopwoodlll ...................................................198 F。G的U niversity eorgia .........................................................................200年1。地方法院拒绝巴克多样性原理 ...............................200 2。介入者的角色 ........................................................................201 3。第十一巡回裁决狭窄的裁剪 .....................................202 g .加州:Post-Affirmative行动景观 .................................204本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
Affirmative Action in Higher Education: Recent Developments in Litigation, Admissions and Diversity Research
I. Affirmative Action Litigation Update ................................................................ 174 A. The Current Landscape and the Role of Intervenors ................................. 174 B. Grutter: The University of Michigan Law School Case ............................ 176 1. Trial Court Ruling on the University's Case: Diversity is not a C om pelling Interest ............................................................................ 176 i). Factual Findings .......................................................................... 176 ii) Bakke and the Diversity Issue ...................................................... 178 iii) Diversity and Educational Benefits ............................................. 179 iv) N arrow Tailoring ....................................................................... 179 2. Silencing the Grutter Intervenors: Obscuring Issues of Bias and D iscrim ination .................................................................................... 180 i) Societal D iscrim ination? .............................................................. 180 ii) Evidence of Bias in Standardized Testing ................................... 181 iii) Trial Court Findings on Testing .................................................. 185 iv) Evidence of Bias in Undergraduate Grades: Campus Climate R esearch ...................................................................................... 186 v) Trial Court Findings on the Campus Climate Study .................... 187 vi) Other Components of the Intervenors' Case ................................ 188 3. Post-trial D evelopm ents ...................................................................... 190 C. Gratz: The University of Michigan Undergraduate Case ......................... 190 1. University Wins Partial Summary Judgment ..................................... 190 2. Intervenors Loses Case for a Remedial Rationale ............................... 193 D. The University of Washington Law School and Initiative-200 ................. 195 1. Ninth Circuit Rules that Diversity is Compelling ............................... 196 E. The Fifth Circuit's Rulings in Hopwoodll and III ................................... 197 1. Brief Overview of Hopwood// ........................................................... 197 2. Recent Developments: Hopwoodlll ................................................... 198 F. The U niversity of G eorgia ......................................................................... 200 1. District Court Rejects Bakke Diversity Rationale ............................... 200 2. The Intervenors' Role ........................................................................ 201 3. Eleventh Circuit Ruling on Narrow Tailoring ..................................... 202 G. California: The Post-Affirmative Action Landscape ................................. 204
求助全文
通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。
去求助
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
