中华人民共和国对印尼南海领土主张的影响(2014 - 2016)

Hendra Manurung
{"title":"中华人民共和国对印尼南海领土主张的影响(2014 - 2016)","authors":"Hendra Manurung","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2942220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, China has not abandoned its policy of resolving the contentious South China Sea (SCS) issue through peaceful means. China’s recent state behavior and unilateral military measures like naval blockades, and xenophobic rhetoric have all given the impression that overconfident China is increasingly shedding its soft-power image in resolving both the East China Sea and South China Sea disputes. China as the world’s 2nd largest economy which has already aroused deep suspicions among its neighbors by increasing its national defense budget in 2014 by 12 percent to USD132 billion, making it second in the world only to the U.S’s defense spending of USD528 billion. China’s recent measures such as new fisheries laws, the establishment of an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) in the East China Sea and, most recently, a naval blockade around Second Thomas Shoal, known in China as the Ren’ai Reef and in the Philippines as Ayungin which is in the SCS have aggravated regional fears. In the past, China has resorted to military options to occupy territories that were claimed by other countries. In mid March 1988, China deployed its troops to seize the reefs of Co Lin (Collins), Len Dao (Lansdowne) and Gac Ma (Johnson South) in the Spratly archipelago, also known as Truong Sa in Vietnamese from Vietnam. China refers to Johnson South Reef as Chiguajiao, which is now under Beijing control. It raised question why China now resort to military options again in pursuing its South China Sea unilateral claim. None of Asian countries wants a war but China’s recent words and deeds are not only alarming but are moving in that direction. However, the main problem with China is that claims almost all of the SCS as its own, based on a vague Ushaped line known as the nine-dash line, an assertion that is fiercely contested by Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei. Indonesia, which is not a claimant state, is more worried about China’s unilateral claims and its assertiveness, which could threaten regional peace and stability as well as the unity of ASEAN. China has now included part of Natuna Islands waters within Indonesia’s Riau Islands province in its territorial map based on the nine-dash line. It is a serious external threat to Indonesia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. This research attempts to explain China’s territorial claim on Indonesia territory which interpreted differently by decision-makers. It used descriptive analytical methodology. It needs appropriate mechanism to prevent open conflict and promote cooperation among disagreeing parties.","PeriodicalId":184519,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International Law of the Sea (Topic)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of People's Republic of China (PRC) Territorial Claim on South China Sea (SCS) to Indonesia (2014 - 2016)\",\"authors\":\"Hendra Manurung\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2942220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, China has not abandoned its policy of resolving the contentious South China Sea (SCS) issue through peaceful means. China’s recent state behavior and unilateral military measures like naval blockades, and xenophobic rhetoric have all given the impression that overconfident China is increasingly shedding its soft-power image in resolving both the East China Sea and South China Sea disputes. China as the world’s 2nd largest economy which has already aroused deep suspicions among its neighbors by increasing its national defense budget in 2014 by 12 percent to USD132 billion, making it second in the world only to the U.S’s defense spending of USD528 billion. China’s recent measures such as new fisheries laws, the establishment of an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) in the East China Sea and, most recently, a naval blockade around Second Thomas Shoal, known in China as the Ren’ai Reef and in the Philippines as Ayungin which is in the SCS have aggravated regional fears. In the past, China has resorted to military options to occupy territories that were claimed by other countries. In mid March 1988, China deployed its troops to seize the reefs of Co Lin (Collins), Len Dao (Lansdowne) and Gac Ma (Johnson South) in the Spratly archipelago, also known as Truong Sa in Vietnamese from Vietnam. China refers to Johnson South Reef as Chiguajiao, which is now under Beijing control. It raised question why China now resort to military options again in pursuing its South China Sea unilateral claim. None of Asian countries wants a war but China’s recent words and deeds are not only alarming but are moving in that direction. However, the main problem with China is that claims almost all of the SCS as its own, based on a vague Ushaped line known as the nine-dash line, an assertion that is fiercely contested by Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei. Indonesia, which is not a claimant state, is more worried about China’s unilateral claims and its assertiveness, which could threaten regional peace and stability as well as the unity of ASEAN. China has now included part of Natuna Islands waters within Indonesia’s Riau Islands province in its territorial map based on the nine-dash line. It is a serious external threat to Indonesia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. This research attempts to explain China’s territorial claim on Indonesia territory which interpreted differently by decision-makers. It used descriptive analytical methodology. It needs appropriate mechanism to prevent open conflict and promote cooperation among disagreeing parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: International Law of the Sea (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: International Law of the Sea (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2942220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International Law of the Sea (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2942220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前,中国没有放弃通过和平方式解决南海争议问题的政策。中国最近的国家行为和单方面的军事措施,如海上封锁,以及仇外言论,都给人的印象是,过于自信的中国在解决东中国海和南中国海争端方面正日益摆脱其软实力的形象。中国作为世界第二大经济体,2014年的国防预算增加了12%,达到1320亿美元,仅次于美国的5280亿美元,这已经引起了邻国的深切怀疑。中国最近的措施,如新的渔业法,在东海设立防空识别区(ADIZ),以及最近在南海的第二托马斯浅滩(中国称为仁爱礁,菲律宾称为阿云金)周围的海上封锁,加剧了地区的担忧。过去,中国曾诉诸军事手段占领其他国家声称拥有主权的领土。1988年3月中旬,中国派兵占领了南沙群岛的科林斯(Collins)、兰岛(Lansdowne)和约翰逊南(Gac Ma)三个岛礁,越南称其为长沙。中国称约翰逊南礁为赤瓜角,目前在北京控制之下。这引发了人们的疑问,为什么中国现在再次诉诸军事选择来追求其在南中国海的单方面主张。没有一个亚洲国家想要战争,但中国最近的言行不仅令人担忧,而且正在朝这个方向发展。然而,中国的主要问题是,它声称几乎所有南海都是自己的,依据的是一条模糊的乌沙普划定的九段线,越南、菲律宾、台湾、马来西亚和文莱都对这条线提出了激烈的争议。印尼并不是主权声索国,它更担心中国的单方面主张和自信,这可能威胁到地区和平与稳定以及东盟的团结。中国目前已将印尼廖内群岛内的纳土纳群岛部分水域纳入其基于九段线的领土地图。这是对印度尼西亚领土完整和主权的严重外部威胁。本研究试图解释决策者对中国对印尼领土的不同解释。它使用描述性分析方法。它需要适当的机制来防止公开冲突,促进分歧各方之间的合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of People's Republic of China (PRC) Territorial Claim on South China Sea (SCS) to Indonesia (2014 - 2016)
Currently, China has not abandoned its policy of resolving the contentious South China Sea (SCS) issue through peaceful means. China’s recent state behavior and unilateral military measures like naval blockades, and xenophobic rhetoric have all given the impression that overconfident China is increasingly shedding its soft-power image in resolving both the East China Sea and South China Sea disputes. China as the world’s 2nd largest economy which has already aroused deep suspicions among its neighbors by increasing its national defense budget in 2014 by 12 percent to USD132 billion, making it second in the world only to the U.S’s defense spending of USD528 billion. China’s recent measures such as new fisheries laws, the establishment of an Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) in the East China Sea and, most recently, a naval blockade around Second Thomas Shoal, known in China as the Ren’ai Reef and in the Philippines as Ayungin which is in the SCS have aggravated regional fears. In the past, China has resorted to military options to occupy territories that were claimed by other countries. In mid March 1988, China deployed its troops to seize the reefs of Co Lin (Collins), Len Dao (Lansdowne) and Gac Ma (Johnson South) in the Spratly archipelago, also known as Truong Sa in Vietnamese from Vietnam. China refers to Johnson South Reef as Chiguajiao, which is now under Beijing control. It raised question why China now resort to military options again in pursuing its South China Sea unilateral claim. None of Asian countries wants a war but China’s recent words and deeds are not only alarming but are moving in that direction. However, the main problem with China is that claims almost all of the SCS as its own, based on a vague Ushaped line known as the nine-dash line, an assertion that is fiercely contested by Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia and Brunei. Indonesia, which is not a claimant state, is more worried about China’s unilateral claims and its assertiveness, which could threaten regional peace and stability as well as the unity of ASEAN. China has now included part of Natuna Islands waters within Indonesia’s Riau Islands province in its territorial map based on the nine-dash line. It is a serious external threat to Indonesia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. This research attempts to explain China’s territorial claim on Indonesia territory which interpreted differently by decision-makers. It used descriptive analytical methodology. It needs appropriate mechanism to prevent open conflict and promote cooperation among disagreeing parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信