{"title":"导言:一场“肉体对话”","authors":"Richard David Evan","doi":"10.5117/9789463722100_intro","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter positions the book in the extant scholarship of adaptation\n and phenomenology. It establishes the book’s argument that in order\n to ‘make sense’ of adaptations as adaptations, we must first attend to\n their sensual presence: their look, their sound, their touch, and how\n they materialize in the embodied imagination. This chapter builds on\n foundational adaptation scholarship by Robert Stam, Linda Hutcheon,\n and Christine Geraghty who advance an intertextual approach to studying\n adaptation. Rather, this chapter employs the existential phenomenology\n of Maurice Merleau-Ponty—and how it has been adapted to film studies\n by Vivian Sobchack—to propose an intersubjective account of adaptation.","PeriodicalId":253689,"journal":{"name":"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation","volume":"36 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: A ‘Fleshly Dialogue’\",\"authors\":\"Richard David Evan\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789463722100_intro\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter positions the book in the extant scholarship of adaptation\\n and phenomenology. It establishes the book’s argument that in order\\n to ‘make sense’ of adaptations as adaptations, we must first attend to\\n their sensual presence: their look, their sound, their touch, and how\\n they materialize in the embodied imagination. This chapter builds on\\n foundational adaptation scholarship by Robert Stam, Linda Hutcheon,\\n and Christine Geraghty who advance an intertextual approach to studying\\n adaptation. Rather, this chapter employs the existential phenomenology\\n of Maurice Merleau-Ponty—and how it has been adapted to film studies\\n by Vivian Sobchack—to propose an intersubjective account of adaptation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation\",\"volume\":\"36 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722100_intro\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Film Phenomenology and Adaptation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722100_intro","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter positions the book in the extant scholarship of adaptation
and phenomenology. It establishes the book’s argument that in order
to ‘make sense’ of adaptations as adaptations, we must first attend to
their sensual presence: their look, their sound, their touch, and how
they materialize in the embodied imagination. This chapter builds on
foundational adaptation scholarship by Robert Stam, Linda Hutcheon,
and Christine Geraghty who advance an intertextual approach to studying
adaptation. Rather, this chapter employs the existential phenomenology
of Maurice Merleau-Ponty—and how it has been adapted to film studies
by Vivian Sobchack—to propose an intersubjective account of adaptation.