{"title":"埃塞俄比亚Arba Minch环境和高暴露条件下三种低成本颗粒物(PM2.5)传感器的评估","authors":"Jan Dirk Dingemanse","doi":"10.59122/xec844310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The burden of disease from ambient and indoor air pollution is highest in low-income countries, while their resources for monitoring air pollutants are the lowest. PM2.5 is the primary indicator of air pollution. Reference monitors of PM2.5 are expensive, but there is an increased use of low-cost sensors (LCS). Three LCS, the UCB-PATS+ (PATS), Airvisual Pro (IQAV) and Sensirion SPS30 (SPSA) are being used in Arba Minch, Ethiopia, but their quality has not yet been evaluated under circumstances common to low-income countries, and the variety of metrics used in evaluation studies make comparisons difficult. This study aims to evaluate the three LCS under circumstances encountered in Arba Minch, with metrics commonly used and officially prescribed. Measurements were conducted with the LCS at 2 ambient and 4 high exposure (kitchen) concentrations, and at four of those locations with the gravimetric reference method as well. The quality of the three LCS was evaluated within identical, with reference, and between different types, with commonly reported (regression slope and R2) and officially prescribed (Pearson correlation, bias, accuracy, expanded uncertainty) metrics. The SPSA has low within variation in both ambient and high-exposure situations, meets official requirements compared to the reference, and shows a stable bias across different time and concentration levels. The IQAV and PATS within variations are not up to official standards but show strong linear associations. The IQAVs as a group, and PATSs individually, meet official reference requirements at daily level. Between comparison reveals that all LCS show strong linear associations even at 10-minute average level. For SPSA the association is similar across all ranges, and for the others the association is strong when different ranges are taken into account. Generally, all LCS are a good alternative for expensive reference methods. The strong linear associations suggest the possibility of correcting LCS measurement data based on other studies’ results and based on other LCS, across different concentration ranges. Projects with a budget of $600 can already supply 10 measurement locations. Higher-budget projects can contribute to the quality of low-budget projects when they do not only use expensive monitors, but also LCS at the same location.","PeriodicalId":156282,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Water Science and Technology","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Three Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Sensors for Ambient and High Exposure Conditions in Arba Minch, Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Jan Dirk Dingemanse\",\"doi\":\"10.59122/xec844310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The burden of disease from ambient and indoor air pollution is highest in low-income countries, while their resources for monitoring air pollutants are the lowest. PM2.5 is the primary indicator of air pollution. Reference monitors of PM2.5 are expensive, but there is an increased use of low-cost sensors (LCS). Three LCS, the UCB-PATS+ (PATS), Airvisual Pro (IQAV) and Sensirion SPS30 (SPSA) are being used in Arba Minch, Ethiopia, but their quality has not yet been evaluated under circumstances common to low-income countries, and the variety of metrics used in evaluation studies make comparisons difficult. This study aims to evaluate the three LCS under circumstances encountered in Arba Minch, with metrics commonly used and officially prescribed. Measurements were conducted with the LCS at 2 ambient and 4 high exposure (kitchen) concentrations, and at four of those locations with the gravimetric reference method as well. The quality of the three LCS was evaluated within identical, with reference, and between different types, with commonly reported (regression slope and R2) and officially prescribed (Pearson correlation, bias, accuracy, expanded uncertainty) metrics. The SPSA has low within variation in both ambient and high-exposure situations, meets official requirements compared to the reference, and shows a stable bias across different time and concentration levels. The IQAV and PATS within variations are not up to official standards but show strong linear associations. The IQAVs as a group, and PATSs individually, meet official reference requirements at daily level. Between comparison reveals that all LCS show strong linear associations even at 10-minute average level. For SPSA the association is similar across all ranges, and for the others the association is strong when different ranges are taken into account. Generally, all LCS are a good alternative for expensive reference methods. The strong linear associations suggest the possibility of correcting LCS measurement data based on other studies’ results and based on other LCS, across different concentration ranges. Projects with a budget of $600 can already supply 10 measurement locations. Higher-budget projects can contribute to the quality of low-budget projects when they do not only use expensive monitors, but also LCS at the same location.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Water Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethiopian Journal of Water Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59122/xec844310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59122/xec844310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
环境和室内空气污染造成的疾病负担在低收入国家最高,而它们用于监测空气污染物的资源却最少。PM2.5是空气污染的首要指标。PM2.5的参考监测器价格昂贵,但低成本传感器(LCS)的使用有所增加。三个LCS, UCB-PATS+ (PATS), Airvisual Pro (IQAV)和Sensirion SPS30 (SPSA)正在埃塞俄比亚的Arba Minch使用,但它们的质量尚未在低收入国家的常见情况下进行评估,评估研究中使用的各种指标使得比较困难。本研究旨在评估在Arba Minch遇到的情况下的三种LCS,使用常用的和官方规定的指标。LCS在2个环境和4个高暴露(厨房)浓度地点进行了测量,其中4个地点也采用了重力参考方法。三个LCS的质量在相同、参考和不同类型之间进行评估,使用通常报告的(回归斜率和R2)和官方规定的(Pearson相关性、偏差、准确性、扩展不确定性)指标。SPSA在环境和高暴露情况下均具有较低的变化范围,与参考值相比符合官方要求,并且在不同时间和浓度水平下表现出稳定的偏差。IQAV和PATS的变化不符合官方标准,但显示出很强的线性关联。整体的质量评价指标和个别的质量评价指标均符合官方每日水平的参考要求。比较结果表明,即使在10分钟的平均水平上,所有LCS也表现出强烈的线性关联。对于SPSA,这种关联在所有范围内都是相似的,对于其他的,当考虑到不同的范围时,这种关联是很强的。一般来说,所有LCS都是昂贵的参考方法的良好替代方案。这种强线性关联表明,在不同浓度范围内,基于其他研究结果和其他LCS,校正LCS测量数据是可能的。预算为600美元的项目已经可以提供10个测量位置。当高预算项目不仅使用昂贵的监视器,而且在同一位置使用LCS时,它们可以提高低预算项目的质量。
Evaluation of Three Low-Cost Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Sensors for Ambient and High Exposure Conditions in Arba Minch, Ethiopia
The burden of disease from ambient and indoor air pollution is highest in low-income countries, while their resources for monitoring air pollutants are the lowest. PM2.5 is the primary indicator of air pollution. Reference monitors of PM2.5 are expensive, but there is an increased use of low-cost sensors (LCS). Three LCS, the UCB-PATS+ (PATS), Airvisual Pro (IQAV) and Sensirion SPS30 (SPSA) are being used in Arba Minch, Ethiopia, but their quality has not yet been evaluated under circumstances common to low-income countries, and the variety of metrics used in evaluation studies make comparisons difficult. This study aims to evaluate the three LCS under circumstances encountered in Arba Minch, with metrics commonly used and officially prescribed. Measurements were conducted with the LCS at 2 ambient and 4 high exposure (kitchen) concentrations, and at four of those locations with the gravimetric reference method as well. The quality of the three LCS was evaluated within identical, with reference, and between different types, with commonly reported (regression slope and R2) and officially prescribed (Pearson correlation, bias, accuracy, expanded uncertainty) metrics. The SPSA has low within variation in both ambient and high-exposure situations, meets official requirements compared to the reference, and shows a stable bias across different time and concentration levels. The IQAV and PATS within variations are not up to official standards but show strong linear associations. The IQAVs as a group, and PATSs individually, meet official reference requirements at daily level. Between comparison reveals that all LCS show strong linear associations even at 10-minute average level. For SPSA the association is similar across all ranges, and for the others the association is strong when different ranges are taken into account. Generally, all LCS are a good alternative for expensive reference methods. The strong linear associations suggest the possibility of correcting LCS measurement data based on other studies’ results and based on other LCS, across different concentration ranges. Projects with a budget of $600 can already supply 10 measurement locations. Higher-budget projects can contribute to the quality of low-budget projects when they do not only use expensive monitors, but also LCS at the same location.