{"title":"Luba Jurgenson和Nicolas Werth,古拉格:证词和档案","authors":"Alan Barenberg","doi":"10.4000/pipss.4431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is it best to examine the history of the Gulag from literary or historical perspectives? Should one attempt to study the camps from below, through prisoners' own words, or is it better to analyze the Gulag through the reports written by state bureaucrats? As Luba Jurgenson and Nicolas Werth argue and demonstrate in Le Goulag : Temoignages et archives, it is not necessary to make such a choice. In fact, one shouldn't – as the editors show, it is only through the careful consideration of both p...","PeriodicalId":382204,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of power institutions in post-soviet societies","volume":"8 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Luba Jurgenson et Nicolas Werth, Le Goulag : Témoignages et archives\",\"authors\":\"Alan Barenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/pipss.4431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Is it best to examine the history of the Gulag from literary or historical perspectives? Should one attempt to study the camps from below, through prisoners' own words, or is it better to analyze the Gulag through the reports written by state bureaucrats? As Luba Jurgenson and Nicolas Werth argue and demonstrate in Le Goulag : Temoignages et archives, it is not necessary to make such a choice. In fact, one shouldn't – as the editors show, it is only through the careful consideration of both p...\",\"PeriodicalId\":382204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of power institutions in post-soviet societies\",\"volume\":\"8 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of power institutions in post-soviet societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/pipss.4431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of power institutions in post-soviet societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/pipss.4431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
从文学还是历史的角度来审视古拉格的历史?人们应该尝试通过囚犯自己的话语,从下面研究集中营,还是通过国家官员写的报告来分析古拉格?正如Luba Jurgenson和Nicolas Werth在《Le Goulag: Temoignages et archives》一书中所论证的那样,没有必要做出这样的选择。事实上,人们不应该——正如编辑们所表明的那样,只有经过双方的仔细考虑……
Luba Jurgenson et Nicolas Werth, Le Goulag : Témoignages et archives
Is it best to examine the history of the Gulag from literary or historical perspectives? Should one attempt to study the camps from below, through prisoners' own words, or is it better to analyze the Gulag through the reports written by state bureaucrats? As Luba Jurgenson and Nicolas Werth argue and demonstrate in Le Goulag : Temoignages et archives, it is not necessary to make such a choice. In fact, one shouldn't – as the editors show, it is only through the careful consideration of both p...