资源配置专业化、市场认可专业化与审计收费:来自中国审计市场的证据

Yingfei Liu, C. Patel, S. Ying, Hao Qiu
{"title":"资源配置专业化、市场认可专业化与审计收费:来自中国审计市场的证据","authors":"Yingfei Liu, C. Patel, S. Ying, Hao Qiu","doi":"10.22495/COCV12I4C7P7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing literature on audit industry specialization in Anglo-American countries often measures industry specialization using firms’ market share in specific industries from market recognition perspective. This paper contributes to the audit industry specialization research by distinguishing between market recognition specialization and resource allocation specialization, and tests their different effects on audit fees in the Chinese audit market. The results support the hypotheses that market recognition specialization is likely to lead to higher audit fees in the whole audit market, resource allocation specialization is likely to lead to lower audit fees in ‘top–ten’ audit firms, and there is likely to be no effect of resource allocation specialization on audit fees in ‘non–top–ten’ audit firms. The findings have implications for the regulators both in China and globally in designing strategies to enhance the functioning of audit firms. Importantly, the findings suggest that economic, political and social contexts of a country cannot be ignored in examining audit industry specialization","PeriodicalId":438501,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Ownership and Control","volume":"312 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resource-allocation specialization, market-recognition specialization and audit fees : evidence from the Chinese audit market\",\"authors\":\"Yingfei Liu, C. Patel, S. Ying, Hao Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.22495/COCV12I4C7P7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing literature on audit industry specialization in Anglo-American countries often measures industry specialization using firms’ market share in specific industries from market recognition perspective. This paper contributes to the audit industry specialization research by distinguishing between market recognition specialization and resource allocation specialization, and tests their different effects on audit fees in the Chinese audit market. The results support the hypotheses that market recognition specialization is likely to lead to higher audit fees in the whole audit market, resource allocation specialization is likely to lead to lower audit fees in ‘top–ten’ audit firms, and there is likely to be no effect of resource allocation specialization on audit fees in ‘non–top–ten’ audit firms. The findings have implications for the regulators both in China and globally in designing strategies to enhance the functioning of audit firms. Importantly, the findings suggest that economic, political and social contexts of a country cannot be ignored in examining audit industry specialization\",\"PeriodicalId\":438501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Ownership and Control\",\"volume\":\"312 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Ownership and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22495/COCV12I4C7P7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Ownership and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22495/COCV12I4C7P7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英美国家现有的审计行业专业化研究文献往往从市场认知的角度,用审计公司在特定行业的市场份额来衡量行业专业化。本文通过区分市场认可专业化和资源配置专业化,对审计行业专业化研究有所贡献,并检验了它们对中国审计市场审计费用的不同影响。研究结果支持以下假设:市场认可专业化可能导致整个审计市场的审计费用增加,资源配置专业化可能导致“十大”审计事务所的审计费用降低,资源配置专业化可能对“非十大”审计事务所的审计费用没有影响。研究结果对中国和全球的监管机构设计增强审计事务所功能的策略具有启示意义。重要的是,研究结果表明,在审查审计行业专业化时,不能忽视一个国家的经济、政治和社会背景
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resource-allocation specialization, market-recognition specialization and audit fees : evidence from the Chinese audit market
Existing literature on audit industry specialization in Anglo-American countries often measures industry specialization using firms’ market share in specific industries from market recognition perspective. This paper contributes to the audit industry specialization research by distinguishing between market recognition specialization and resource allocation specialization, and tests their different effects on audit fees in the Chinese audit market. The results support the hypotheses that market recognition specialization is likely to lead to higher audit fees in the whole audit market, resource allocation specialization is likely to lead to lower audit fees in ‘top–ten’ audit firms, and there is likely to be no effect of resource allocation specialization on audit fees in ‘non–top–ten’ audit firms. The findings have implications for the regulators both in China and globally in designing strategies to enhance the functioning of audit firms. Importantly, the findings suggest that economic, political and social contexts of a country cannot be ignored in examining audit industry specialization
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信