EM-Coffee: M-Coffee的改良版

Nguyen Ha Anh Tuan, Ha Tuan Cuong, N. H. Dũng, L. Vinh, Tu Minh Phuong
{"title":"EM-Coffee: M-Coffee的改良版","authors":"Nguyen Ha Anh Tuan, Ha Tuan Cuong, N. H. Dũng, L. Vinh, Tu Minh Phuong","doi":"10.1109/KSE.2010.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple sequence alignment is a basic of sequence analysis. In the development of multiple sequence alignment (MSA) approaches, M-Coffee [1] was proposed as a meta-method for assembling outputs from different individual multiple aligners into one single MSA to boost the accuracy. Authors showed that M-Coffee outperformed individual alignment methods. In this paper, we propose an improvement of M-coffee, called EM-Coffee, by introducing a new weighting scheme for combining input alignments. Experiments with benchmark datasets showed that EM-Coffee produced better results than M-Coffee, T-Coffee, Muscle and some other widely used methods. Thus, we provide an alternative option for researchers to align sequences.","PeriodicalId":158823,"journal":{"name":"2010 Second International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EM-Coffee: An Improvement of M-Coffee\",\"authors\":\"Nguyen Ha Anh Tuan, Ha Tuan Cuong, N. H. Dũng, L. Vinh, Tu Minh Phuong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/KSE.2010.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiple sequence alignment is a basic of sequence analysis. In the development of multiple sequence alignment (MSA) approaches, M-Coffee [1] was proposed as a meta-method for assembling outputs from different individual multiple aligners into one single MSA to boost the accuracy. Authors showed that M-Coffee outperformed individual alignment methods. In this paper, we propose an improvement of M-coffee, called EM-Coffee, by introducing a new weighting scheme for combining input alignments. Experiments with benchmark datasets showed that EM-Coffee produced better results than M-Coffee, T-Coffee, Muscle and some other widely used methods. Thus, we provide an alternative option for researchers to align sequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Second International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Second International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/KSE.2010.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Second International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/KSE.2010.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多序列比对是序列分析的基础。在多序列比对(MSA)方法的发展中,M-Coffee[1]被提出作为一种元方法,将不同的多个序列比对器的输出集合到一个单一的MSA中,以提高精度。作者表明M-Coffee优于个体对齐方法。在本文中,我们提出了M-coffee的改进,称为EM-Coffee,通过引入一个新的加权方案来组合输入对齐。基于基准数据集的实验表明,EM-Coffee比M-Coffee、T-Coffee、Muscle和其他一些广泛使用的方法产生了更好的结果。因此,我们为研究人员提供了另一种选择来排列序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EM-Coffee: An Improvement of M-Coffee
Multiple sequence alignment is a basic of sequence analysis. In the development of multiple sequence alignment (MSA) approaches, M-Coffee [1] was proposed as a meta-method for assembling outputs from different individual multiple aligners into one single MSA to boost the accuracy. Authors showed that M-Coffee outperformed individual alignment methods. In this paper, we propose an improvement of M-coffee, called EM-Coffee, by introducing a new weighting scheme for combining input alignments. Experiments with benchmark datasets showed that EM-Coffee produced better results than M-Coffee, T-Coffee, Muscle and some other widely used methods. Thus, we provide an alternative option for researchers to align sequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信