强制审核员轮岗和审计质量

Ajit Dayanandan, Sudershan Kuntluru
{"title":"强制审核员轮岗和审计质量","authors":"Ajit Dayanandan, Sudershan Kuntluru","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-02-2023-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn the post-Enron era around the world, the role of auditor is widely debated. There is an increasing concern that an auditor’s continuous involvement with clients could impair audit quality – the negative view. There is also a positive view that a long auditor tenure leads to accumulation of client-specific knowledge over time, which could lead to high-quality audits. The empirical result with regards to impact of mandatory auditor rotation (MAR) is mixed world-wide. This study aims to examine whether MAR rules implemented in 2017 impact audit quality in India.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing a unique setting in which MAR was required from 2017 to 2018 onwards in India, this study provides empirical evidence of the impact of MAR regulation on audit quality (modified audit opinion). The study uses data for 714 firms (4,284 firms) for six years (three years before MAR and three years after MAR regulation in India).\n\n\nFindings\nThe study found that auditor tenure and MAR had significant negative impacts on audit quality, validating the “positive” view of audit tenure and audit quality. In addition, concentrated ownership had a negative impact on audit quality, implying the control and influence by concentrated ownership on auditors and audit opinion. The analysis shows that MAR regulation has not yielded the intended objective of improving audit quality in India. MAR is not a good template for improving audit quality.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe findings of the study are useful to policymakers, regulators, managers, investors and users of financial reports. The study calls for public policy on auditor rotation based on objective scientific evidence. In light of the evidence in India that MAR does not lead to better audit quality, the study calls for reset of regulatory policy in India.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study provides valuable insights to analysts, regulators and other users of financial accounts about the implications of MAR in India.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe study is one of the few to report on the impact of MAR, particularly in the context of an emerging market economy such as India.\n","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandatory auditor rotation and audit quality\",\"authors\":\"Ajit Dayanandan, Sudershan Kuntluru\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijaim-02-2023-0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nIn the post-Enron era around the world, the role of auditor is widely debated. There is an increasing concern that an auditor’s continuous involvement with clients could impair audit quality – the negative view. There is also a positive view that a long auditor tenure leads to accumulation of client-specific knowledge over time, which could lead to high-quality audits. The empirical result with regards to impact of mandatory auditor rotation (MAR) is mixed world-wide. This study aims to examine whether MAR rules implemented in 2017 impact audit quality in India.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nUsing a unique setting in which MAR was required from 2017 to 2018 onwards in India, this study provides empirical evidence of the impact of MAR regulation on audit quality (modified audit opinion). The study uses data for 714 firms (4,284 firms) for six years (three years before MAR and three years after MAR regulation in India).\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe study found that auditor tenure and MAR had significant negative impacts on audit quality, validating the “positive” view of audit tenure and audit quality. In addition, concentrated ownership had a negative impact on audit quality, implying the control and influence by concentrated ownership on auditors and audit opinion. The analysis shows that MAR regulation has not yielded the intended objective of improving audit quality in India. MAR is not a good template for improving audit quality.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe findings of the study are useful to policymakers, regulators, managers, investors and users of financial reports. The study calls for public policy on auditor rotation based on objective scientific evidence. In light of the evidence in India that MAR does not lead to better audit quality, the study calls for reset of regulatory policy in India.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe study provides valuable insights to analysts, regulators and other users of financial accounts about the implications of MAR in India.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe study is one of the few to report on the impact of MAR, particularly in the context of an emerging market economy such as India.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":229587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-02-2023-0049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-02-2023-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在安然事件后的世界范围内,审计师的角色被广泛争论。越来越多的人担心,审计师与客户的持续接触可能会损害审计质量——消极观点。还有一种积极的观点认为,长期的审计师任期会导致客户特定知识的积累,这可能会导致高质量的审计。关于强制性审计轮转(MAR)影响的实证结果在世界范围内是混合的。本研究旨在研究2017年实施的MAR规则是否会影响印度的审计质量。设计/方法/方法采用印度2017年至2018年需要MAR的独特环境,本研究提供了MAR法规对审计质量影响的经验证据(修改后的审计意见)。该研究使用了714家公司(4284家公司)6年的数据(印度MAR出台前3年和MAR出台后3年)。研究发现,审计师的任期和MAR对审计质量有显著的负面影响,验证了审计任期和审计质量的“积极”观点。此外,股权集中对审计质量有负向影响,这意味着股权集中对审计师和审计意见的控制和影响。分析表明,MAR法规并没有达到提高印度审计质量的预期目标。MAR不是提高审计质量的好模板。研究的局限性/启示本研究的发现对决策者、监管者、管理者、投资者和财务报告的使用者都是有用的。该研究呼吁在客观科学证据的基础上制定审计轮转的公共政策。鉴于印度的证据表明,MAR不会带来更好的审计质量,该研究呼吁印度重新调整监管政策。该研究为分析师、监管机构和其他金融账户用户提供了有关印度MAR影响的宝贵见解。该研究是为数不多的报告市场价值影响的研究之一,尤其是在印度等新兴市场经济体的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mandatory auditor rotation and audit quality
Purpose In the post-Enron era around the world, the role of auditor is widely debated. There is an increasing concern that an auditor’s continuous involvement with clients could impair audit quality – the negative view. There is also a positive view that a long auditor tenure leads to accumulation of client-specific knowledge over time, which could lead to high-quality audits. The empirical result with regards to impact of mandatory auditor rotation (MAR) is mixed world-wide. This study aims to examine whether MAR rules implemented in 2017 impact audit quality in India. Design/methodology/approach Using a unique setting in which MAR was required from 2017 to 2018 onwards in India, this study provides empirical evidence of the impact of MAR regulation on audit quality (modified audit opinion). The study uses data for 714 firms (4,284 firms) for six years (three years before MAR and three years after MAR regulation in India). Findings The study found that auditor tenure and MAR had significant negative impacts on audit quality, validating the “positive” view of audit tenure and audit quality. In addition, concentrated ownership had a negative impact on audit quality, implying the control and influence by concentrated ownership on auditors and audit opinion. The analysis shows that MAR regulation has not yielded the intended objective of improving audit quality in India. MAR is not a good template for improving audit quality. Research limitations/implications The findings of the study are useful to policymakers, regulators, managers, investors and users of financial reports. The study calls for public policy on auditor rotation based on objective scientific evidence. In light of the evidence in India that MAR does not lead to better audit quality, the study calls for reset of regulatory policy in India. Practical implications The study provides valuable insights to analysts, regulators and other users of financial accounts about the implications of MAR in India. Originality/value The study is one of the few to report on the impact of MAR, particularly in the context of an emerging market economy such as India.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信