导师反馈在电子课程写作中的作用

G. Shabashvili, Ketevan Gochitashvili
{"title":"导师反馈在电子课程写作中的作用","authors":"G. Shabashvili, Ketevan Gochitashvili","doi":"10.22333/ijme.2018.12006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper aims to discuss the type, role and features of feedback of online writing course within the Georgian higher educational environment. Regulations of E-Learning Education is not set yet in the country. Therefore tutors are not experienced to run ecourses in general and the role/ importance of e-feedback is almost unfamiliar to them. The paper is preliminary research which aims to reveal the tutors’ attitudes/ readiness to apply e-feedback in their further activities. The research was conducted by following methods: Interviews: teachers were asked what do they think about importance of e-feedback and to which extent are they experienced in this regard. Questioners: teachers were given information about the main writing activities (Content, Structure, Analyse, Sources, Citation…) and main type of Feedback (Negative, Positive, Group, Corrective, Preventive, Peer, Evaluative) for each activity. Questioners contain the list of different feedback tools (e-mail, Forum, Private message, Audio/video-feedback…) as well. Teachers were given the opportunity to choose the most appropriate combination of feedback tools and types of each writing activities. Data analyse and results: The research reveals that instructors would prefer FtoF communication and traditional evaluation. As for the above mentioned combinations given in questionnaires, they were choosing simplest and not specific variations. Thus, they are less aware of the type of feedbacks and did not realize the possibilities and effectiveness. The paper studies the main reasons of it and based on both theoretical approaches and analysed data gives the recommendations to tutors. The results are generalized and prepared as a guidelines for the course designers and authors","PeriodicalId":361082,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTILINGUAL EDUCATION","volume":"65 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Tutor’s Feedback in Writing E-Course\",\"authors\":\"G. Shabashvili, Ketevan Gochitashvili\",\"doi\":\"10.22333/ijme.2018.12006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paper aims to discuss the type, role and features of feedback of online writing course within the Georgian higher educational environment. Regulations of E-Learning Education is not set yet in the country. Therefore tutors are not experienced to run ecourses in general and the role/ importance of e-feedback is almost unfamiliar to them. The paper is preliminary research which aims to reveal the tutors’ attitudes/ readiness to apply e-feedback in their further activities. The research was conducted by following methods: Interviews: teachers were asked what do they think about importance of e-feedback and to which extent are they experienced in this regard. Questioners: teachers were given information about the main writing activities (Content, Structure, Analyse, Sources, Citation…) and main type of Feedback (Negative, Positive, Group, Corrective, Preventive, Peer, Evaluative) for each activity. Questioners contain the list of different feedback tools (e-mail, Forum, Private message, Audio/video-feedback…) as well. Teachers were given the opportunity to choose the most appropriate combination of feedback tools and types of each writing activities. Data analyse and results: The research reveals that instructors would prefer FtoF communication and traditional evaluation. As for the above mentioned combinations given in questionnaires, they were choosing simplest and not specific variations. Thus, they are less aware of the type of feedbacks and did not realize the possibilities and effectiveness. The paper studies the main reasons of it and based on both theoretical approaches and analysed data gives the recommendations to tutors. The results are generalized and prepared as a guidelines for the course designers and authors\",\"PeriodicalId\":361082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTILINGUAL EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\"65 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTILINGUAL EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22333/ijme.2018.12006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTILINGUAL EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22333/ijme.2018.12006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探讨格鲁吉亚高等教育环境下网络写作课程反馈的类型、作用和特点。国内还没有制定电子学习教育的相关规定。因此,导师通常没有经验来管理课程,电子反馈的作用/重要性对他们来说几乎是陌生的。本文是一项初步研究,旨在揭示导师在进一步的活动中应用电子反馈的态度/准备情况。本研究采用以下方法进行:访谈:教师被问及他们对电子反馈的重要性的看法以及他们在这方面的经验程度。提问者:教师被告知关于每个活动的主要写作活动(内容、结构、分析、来源、引用……)和主要反馈类型(消极、积极、小组、纠正、预防、同伴、评价)的信息。提问者包含不同的反馈工具列表(电子邮件,论坛,私人消息,音频/视频反馈…)。教师有机会选择最合适的反馈工具组合和每种写作活动的类型。数据分析和结果:研究表明,教师更倾向于FtoF交流和传统的评估。对于上述问卷中给出的组合,他们选择的是最简单的,而不是具体的变异。因此,他们对反馈的类型了解较少,没有意识到反馈的可能性和有效性。本文对其主要原因进行了研究,并从理论方法和分析数据两方面对教师提出了建议。这些结果被概括并准备作为课程设计者和作者的指导方针
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Tutor’s Feedback in Writing E-Course
Paper aims to discuss the type, role and features of feedback of online writing course within the Georgian higher educational environment. Regulations of E-Learning Education is not set yet in the country. Therefore tutors are not experienced to run ecourses in general and the role/ importance of e-feedback is almost unfamiliar to them. The paper is preliminary research which aims to reveal the tutors’ attitudes/ readiness to apply e-feedback in their further activities. The research was conducted by following methods: Interviews: teachers were asked what do they think about importance of e-feedback and to which extent are they experienced in this regard. Questioners: teachers were given information about the main writing activities (Content, Structure, Analyse, Sources, Citation…) and main type of Feedback (Negative, Positive, Group, Corrective, Preventive, Peer, Evaluative) for each activity. Questioners contain the list of different feedback tools (e-mail, Forum, Private message, Audio/video-feedback…) as well. Teachers were given the opportunity to choose the most appropriate combination of feedback tools and types of each writing activities. Data analyse and results: The research reveals that instructors would prefer FtoF communication and traditional evaluation. As for the above mentioned combinations given in questionnaires, they were choosing simplest and not specific variations. Thus, they are less aware of the type of feedbacks and did not realize the possibilities and effectiveness. The paper studies the main reasons of it and based on both theoretical approaches and analysed data gives the recommendations to tutors. The results are generalized and prepared as a guidelines for the course designers and authors
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信