英国女性生殖器切割和设计阴道:制定有效的法律和政策框架

Lisa R. Avalos
{"title":"英国女性生殖器切割和设计阴道:制定有效的法律和政策框架","authors":"Lisa R. Avalos","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2481729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of female genital mutilation (FGM) in Britain and Europe has grown in recent years as a result of international migration, and European institutions have grown increasingly concerned with eradicating the practice. According to the European Parliament, approximately 500,000 girls and women living in Europe have undergone FGM and are suffering with the lifelong consequences of the procedure, and more than 30,000 girls in Britain are thought to be at risk of future FGM. Although Britain strengthened its law against FGM in 2003, the number of girls at risk continues to grow, and there have been no convictions for FGM in England and Wales. This Article examines Britain’s legal and policy approach to FGM, analyzing key gaps in British law that allow girls at risk to go unprotected, and giving a range of policy suggestions for closing these gaps. The Article also gives particular attention to the relationship between FGM and so-called “designer vagina” surgeries, addressing the double standard whereby FGM is prohibited by law while designer vagina surgery has been allowed to flourish. The Article concludes with legal and policy recommendations for increasing protection against FGM and for coordinating the approach to FGM and designer vagina surgery. In particular, it proposes a Model FGM law which is much more robust than Britain’s current FGM law and which provides additional opportunities to protect those at-risk and to prosecute those who facilitate or carry out FGM.","PeriodicalId":439669,"journal":{"name":"Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Female Genital Mutilation and Designer Vaginas in Britain: Crafting an Effective Legal and Policy Framework\",\"authors\":\"Lisa R. Avalos\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2481729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prevalence of female genital mutilation (FGM) in Britain and Europe has grown in recent years as a result of international migration, and European institutions have grown increasingly concerned with eradicating the practice. According to the European Parliament, approximately 500,000 girls and women living in Europe have undergone FGM and are suffering with the lifelong consequences of the procedure, and more than 30,000 girls in Britain are thought to be at risk of future FGM. Although Britain strengthened its law against FGM in 2003, the number of girls at risk continues to grow, and there have been no convictions for FGM in England and Wales. This Article examines Britain’s legal and policy approach to FGM, analyzing key gaps in British law that allow girls at risk to go unprotected, and giving a range of policy suggestions for closing these gaps. The Article also gives particular attention to the relationship between FGM and so-called “designer vagina” surgeries, addressing the double standard whereby FGM is prohibited by law while designer vagina surgery has been allowed to flourish. The Article concludes with legal and policy recommendations for increasing protection against FGM and for coordinating the approach to FGM and designer vagina surgery. In particular, it proposes a Model FGM law which is much more robust than Britain’s current FGM law and which provides additional opportunities to protect those at-risk and to prosecute those who facilitate or carry out FGM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":439669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2481729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2481729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,由于国际移民,切割女性生殖器官的现象在英国和欧洲越来越普遍,欧洲机构也越来越关注根除这一习俗。根据欧洲议会的数据,生活在欧洲的大约50万名女孩和妇女经历了女性生殖器切割,并承受着这一手术带来的终生后果,英国有3万多名女孩被认为未来有遭受女性生殖器切割的风险。虽然英国在2003年加强了反对女性生殖器切割的法律,但面临风险的女孩人数继续增加,英格兰和威尔士没有对女性生殖器切割的定罪。本文考察了英国对女性生殖器切割的法律和政策方法,分析了英国法律中允许处于危险中的女孩不受保护的主要差距,并提出了一系列缩小这些差距的政策建议。该条还特别注意了切割女性生殖器与所谓的“设计阴道”手术之间的关系,解决了法律禁止切割女性生殖器而允许设计阴道手术蓬勃发展的双重标准问题。文章最后提出了法律和政策建议,以加强对女性生殖器切割的保护,并协调女性生殖器切割和设计阴道手术的方法。特别是,它提出了一个比英国现行的女性生殖器切割法更强有力的女性生殖器切割示范法,它提供了更多的机会来保护那些有风险的人,并起诉那些促进或实施女性生殖器切割的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Female Genital Mutilation and Designer Vaginas in Britain: Crafting an Effective Legal and Policy Framework
The prevalence of female genital mutilation (FGM) in Britain and Europe has grown in recent years as a result of international migration, and European institutions have grown increasingly concerned with eradicating the practice. According to the European Parliament, approximately 500,000 girls and women living in Europe have undergone FGM and are suffering with the lifelong consequences of the procedure, and more than 30,000 girls in Britain are thought to be at risk of future FGM. Although Britain strengthened its law against FGM in 2003, the number of girls at risk continues to grow, and there have been no convictions for FGM in England and Wales. This Article examines Britain’s legal and policy approach to FGM, analyzing key gaps in British law that allow girls at risk to go unprotected, and giving a range of policy suggestions for closing these gaps. The Article also gives particular attention to the relationship between FGM and so-called “designer vagina” surgeries, addressing the double standard whereby FGM is prohibited by law while designer vagina surgery has been allowed to flourish. The Article concludes with legal and policy recommendations for increasing protection against FGM and for coordinating the approach to FGM and designer vagina surgery. In particular, it proposes a Model FGM law which is much more robust than Britain’s current FGM law and which provides additional opportunities to protect those at-risk and to prosecute those who facilitate or carry out FGM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信