为不完全指定布尔函数联接bdd的改进方法

Renato D. Peralta, Joao P. Nespolo, P. Butzen, M. Kolberg, A. Reis
{"title":"为不完全指定布尔函数联接bdd的改进方法","authors":"Renato D. Peralta, Joao P. Nespolo, P. Butzen, M. Kolberg, A. Reis","doi":"10.1109/ISCAS46773.2023.10181893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An incompletely specified Boolean function, also known as a Boolean relation, can be described by any combination of its on-set, off-set, and don't care (DC) set pairs. To transform a Boolean relation into a Boolean function (fully specified), we have to assign the DCs from the original specification. Depending on the DCs assignment, a better function minimization may result from the original specification. This article presents a method for joining two BDDs by describing the on-set and off-set of an incompletely specified $f$ function into a single BDD for a fully specified coverage of the function. The proposed method is compared with the Restrict, Constrain and LICompaction methods implemented by the CUDD package, which are references for this problem using BDDs. In addition to these methods, we also compare our results with the Join method, which is a more recent proposal for the problem of assigning and minimizing incompletely specified Boolean functions. The LI-Compaction method presented the largest number of BDD nodes among the analyzed methods. Compared to the LICompaction method, the Restrict method produced 2.12% fewer nodes, the Constrain and Join methods produced 1.95% fewer nodes, while our method produced 24.80% fewer nodes.","PeriodicalId":177320,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Improved method to join BDDs for incompletely specified Boolean functions\",\"authors\":\"Renato D. Peralta, Joao P. Nespolo, P. Butzen, M. Kolberg, A. Reis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCAS46773.2023.10181893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An incompletely specified Boolean function, also known as a Boolean relation, can be described by any combination of its on-set, off-set, and don't care (DC) set pairs. To transform a Boolean relation into a Boolean function (fully specified), we have to assign the DCs from the original specification. Depending on the DCs assignment, a better function minimization may result from the original specification. This article presents a method for joining two BDDs by describing the on-set and off-set of an incompletely specified $f$ function into a single BDD for a fully specified coverage of the function. The proposed method is compared with the Restrict, Constrain and LICompaction methods implemented by the CUDD package, which are references for this problem using BDDs. In addition to these methods, we also compare our results with the Join method, which is a more recent proposal for the problem of assigning and minimizing incompletely specified Boolean functions. The LI-Compaction method presented the largest number of BDD nodes among the analyzed methods. Compared to the LICompaction method, the Restrict method produced 2.12% fewer nodes, the Constrain and Join methods produced 1.95% fewer nodes, while our method produced 24.80% fewer nodes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS46773.2023.10181893\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAS46773.2023.10181893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个不完全指定的布尔函数,也称为布尔关系,可以用它的on-set、off-set和don - care (DC)集合对的任意组合来描述。要将布尔关系转换为布尔函数(完全指定),我们必须从原始规范中分配dc。根据DCs的分配,原始规范可能会产生更好的功能最小化。本文提出了一种连接两个BDD的方法,方法是将一个不完全指定的$f$函数的on-set和offset描述为一个具有完全指定的函数覆盖的单个BDD。将该方法与CUDD包实现的Restrict、constraint和liccompcomption方法进行了比较,为使用bdd解决该问题提供了参考。除了这些方法之外,我们还将我们的结果与Join方法进行比较,Join方法是针对分配和最小化不完全指定布尔函数问题的最新建议。在分析的方法中,li -夯实法的BDD节点数量最多。与liccompaction方法相比,Restrict方法产生的节点减少了2.12%,constraint和Join方法产生的节点减少了1.95%,而我们的方法产生的节点减少了24.80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Improved method to join BDDs for incompletely specified Boolean functions
An incompletely specified Boolean function, also known as a Boolean relation, can be described by any combination of its on-set, off-set, and don't care (DC) set pairs. To transform a Boolean relation into a Boolean function (fully specified), we have to assign the DCs from the original specification. Depending on the DCs assignment, a better function minimization may result from the original specification. This article presents a method for joining two BDDs by describing the on-set and off-set of an incompletely specified $f$ function into a single BDD for a fully specified coverage of the function. The proposed method is compared with the Restrict, Constrain and LICompaction methods implemented by the CUDD package, which are references for this problem using BDDs. In addition to these methods, we also compare our results with the Join method, which is a more recent proposal for the problem of assigning and minimizing incompletely specified Boolean functions. The LI-Compaction method presented the largest number of BDD nodes among the analyzed methods. Compared to the LICompaction method, the Restrict method produced 2.12% fewer nodes, the Constrain and Join methods produced 1.95% fewer nodes, while our method produced 24.80% fewer nodes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信