电力市场模型:监管对价值的影响

H. Arango, J.P.G. Abreu, B. Bonatto, Nelson Kagan, C. Tahan, M. R. Gouvêa
{"title":"电力市场模型:监管对价值的影响","authors":"H. Arango, J.P.G. Abreu, B. Bonatto, Nelson Kagan, C. Tahan, M. R. Gouvêa","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2008.4579028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper it is proposed a simple, although useful model, intended for electricity markets, which enlightens the analysis of regulatory procedures and their consequences over value creation. Today it is widely recognized that, in regard to public services, the aim of regulation should be to maximize the social wealth added (EWA). This wealth includes consumers surplus (ECA), tributes paid to government (EGA) and investor value added (EVA). Thus, regulation implies both efficiency, regarding the location of resources, and fair price levels. The task is seriously impaired by informational asymmetries, and a second-best optimum is only attained with incentive-compatible contracts. Those problems, among many others, can be treated with the proposed model. In order to clarify some of the issues, an example is developed showing the social wealth added under several instances of market operation: regulates vs. unregulated firm, level of taxation, and optimized vs. non-optimized investment and resources.","PeriodicalId":118618,"journal":{"name":"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A model for electricity markets: The impact of regulation on value\",\"authors\":\"H. Arango, J.P.G. Abreu, B. Bonatto, Nelson Kagan, C. Tahan, M. R. Gouvêa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2008.4579028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper it is proposed a simple, although useful model, intended for electricity markets, which enlightens the analysis of regulatory procedures and their consequences over value creation. Today it is widely recognized that, in regard to public services, the aim of regulation should be to maximize the social wealth added (EWA). This wealth includes consumers surplus (ECA), tributes paid to government (EGA) and investor value added (EVA). Thus, regulation implies both efficiency, regarding the location of resources, and fair price levels. The task is seriously impaired by informational asymmetries, and a second-best optimum is only attained with incentive-compatible contracts. Those problems, among many others, can be treated with the proposed model. In order to clarify some of the issues, an example is developed showing the social wealth added under several instances of market operation: regulates vs. unregulated firm, level of taxation, and optimized vs. non-optimized investment and resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":118618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2008.4579028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2008.4579028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

在本文中,提出了一个简单的,虽然有用的模型,用于电力市场,这启发了监管程序及其对价值创造的影响的分析。今天,人们普遍认识到,在公共服务方面,管制的目的应该是使社会财富增加(EWA)最大化。这些财富包括消费者剩余(ECA)、向政府缴纳的贡赋(EGA)和投资者附加价值(EVA)。因此,监管意味着资源位置方面的效率和公平的价格水平。信息不对称严重损害了这项任务,只有在激励相容的契约下才能实现次优。这些问题,以及其他许多问题,都可以用所提出的模型来处理。为了澄清一些问题,本文开发了一个例子,显示了在几种市场运作情况下增加的社会财富:监管与不监管的公司,税收水平,优化与非优化的投资和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A model for electricity markets: The impact of regulation on value
In this paper it is proposed a simple, although useful model, intended for electricity markets, which enlightens the analysis of regulatory procedures and their consequences over value creation. Today it is widely recognized that, in regard to public services, the aim of regulation should be to maximize the social wealth added (EWA). This wealth includes consumers surplus (ECA), tributes paid to government (EGA) and investor value added (EVA). Thus, regulation implies both efficiency, regarding the location of resources, and fair price levels. The task is seriously impaired by informational asymmetries, and a second-best optimum is only attained with incentive-compatible contracts. Those problems, among many others, can be treated with the proposed model. In order to clarify some of the issues, an example is developed showing the social wealth added under several instances of market operation: regulates vs. unregulated firm, level of taxation, and optimized vs. non-optimized investment and resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信