东南非共同市场内的金枪鱼渔业和贸易

S. Mailu, Mathew Ngila, A. Wamukota
{"title":"东南非共同市场内的金枪鱼渔业和贸易","authors":"S. Mailu, Mathew Ngila, A. Wamukota","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2827129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tuna is an important marine resource caught in most oceans. Certain tuna species in some of the existing stocks are already overfished, while others are fully exploited. Various mechanisms such as those stemming from the UNCLOS are in place and efforts to streamline management of the tuna fishery are ongoing. Within the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) where the tuna stock is reported as moderately exploited, fishing fleets of Distant Water Fishing Nations (DWFN) are active. Here, they have deployed better technology, catching and trading more tuna than countries operating a less technical operation. Many of the COMESA members operating in this fishery can be described as having a less technical operation. As a consequence, some COMESA countries operating within the same fishery have little or no exports reported in their trading books. This is despite tuna being among the leading tradable marine fish, representing 8% of the value of internationally traded fish products. This paper first reviews relevant literature relating to the tuna fishery within the WIO region. Next, the paper employs an augmented gravity model in an attempt to determine whether membership in COMESA is likely to imply more internal tuna trade. Data on the export of unprocessed tuna (fresh, chilled and frozen) from various data portals is used for this purpose. The study period considered stretches from 2001 to 2012 and examines exports from 19 countries operating in the WIO. Like the bulk of gravity models in trade literature, our approach employs a number of estimation approaches including the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimator as well as the usual OLS. Results show no evidence that COMESA membership means improvements in tuna exports. The analysis suggests several areas that COMESA may take to improve trade among members operating in the WIO tuna fishery. Among them include suggestions for increased investment from locals in the fishery. In addition, suggestions are provided on agreements between fisheries authorities and trade partners, recommendations which may strengthen the bargaining position of COMESA countries and introduce economically viable management decisions and consequently, better trade outcomes.","PeriodicalId":330974,"journal":{"name":"AgriSciRN: Aquaculture Production Science (Sub-Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tuna Fisheries and Trade within COMESA\",\"authors\":\"S. Mailu, Mathew Ngila, A. Wamukota\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2827129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tuna is an important marine resource caught in most oceans. Certain tuna species in some of the existing stocks are already overfished, while others are fully exploited. Various mechanisms such as those stemming from the UNCLOS are in place and efforts to streamline management of the tuna fishery are ongoing. Within the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) where the tuna stock is reported as moderately exploited, fishing fleets of Distant Water Fishing Nations (DWFN) are active. Here, they have deployed better technology, catching and trading more tuna than countries operating a less technical operation. Many of the COMESA members operating in this fishery can be described as having a less technical operation. As a consequence, some COMESA countries operating within the same fishery have little or no exports reported in their trading books. This is despite tuna being among the leading tradable marine fish, representing 8% of the value of internationally traded fish products. This paper first reviews relevant literature relating to the tuna fishery within the WIO region. Next, the paper employs an augmented gravity model in an attempt to determine whether membership in COMESA is likely to imply more internal tuna trade. Data on the export of unprocessed tuna (fresh, chilled and frozen) from various data portals is used for this purpose. The study period considered stretches from 2001 to 2012 and examines exports from 19 countries operating in the WIO. Like the bulk of gravity models in trade literature, our approach employs a number of estimation approaches including the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimator as well as the usual OLS. Results show no evidence that COMESA membership means improvements in tuna exports. The analysis suggests several areas that COMESA may take to improve trade among members operating in the WIO tuna fishery. Among them include suggestions for increased investment from locals in the fishery. In addition, suggestions are provided on agreements between fisheries authorities and trade partners, recommendations which may strengthen the bargaining position of COMESA countries and introduce economically viable management decisions and consequently, better trade outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AgriSciRN: Aquaculture Production Science (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AgriSciRN: Aquaculture Production Science (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2827129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AgriSciRN: Aquaculture Production Science (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2827129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

金枪鱼是大多数海洋捕捞的重要海洋资源。一些现有种群中的某些金枪鱼品种已经被过度捕捞,而另一些品种则被充分利用。《联合国海洋法公约》等各种机制已经到位,精简金枪鱼渔业管理的努力正在进行中。在金枪鱼资源被报告为适度开发的西印度洋(WIO)内,远洋捕鱼国(DWFN)的捕鱼船队十分活跃。在这里,他们采用了更好的技术,比那些技术含量较低的国家捕捞和交易了更多的金枪鱼。从事这一渔业的东南非共同市场的许多成员可以说是技术水平较低。因此,在同一渔业内经营的一些东南非共同市场国家的贸易账簿上很少或根本没有出口报告。尽管金枪鱼是主要的可贸易海鱼之一,占国际贸易鱼类产品价值的8%。本文首先回顾了有关世界渔业组织区域内金枪鱼渔业的相关文献。接下来,本文采用了一个增强的重力模型,试图确定东南非共同市场的成员资格是否可能意味着更多的内部金枪鱼贸易。为此目的使用了来自各种数据门户的关于未加工金枪鱼(新鲜、冷藏和冷冻)出口的数据。研究期间从2001年到2012年,调查了在世界贸易组织开展业务的19个国家的出口情况。与贸易文献中的大部分重力模型一样,我们的方法采用了许多估计方法,包括泊松伪极大似然估计器以及通常的OLS。结果显示,没有证据表明东南非共同市场的成员资格意味着金枪鱼出口的改善。分析提出了东南非共同市场可以采取的几个领域,以改善从事世界渔业组织金枪鱼渔业的成员之间的贸易。其中包括增加当地人对渔业投资的建议。此外,还就渔业当局与贸易伙伴之间的协定提出了建议,这些建议可以加强东南非共同市场国家的谈判地位,提出经济上可行的管理决定,从而取得更好的贸易成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tuna Fisheries and Trade within COMESA
Tuna is an important marine resource caught in most oceans. Certain tuna species in some of the existing stocks are already overfished, while others are fully exploited. Various mechanisms such as those stemming from the UNCLOS are in place and efforts to streamline management of the tuna fishery are ongoing. Within the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) where the tuna stock is reported as moderately exploited, fishing fleets of Distant Water Fishing Nations (DWFN) are active. Here, they have deployed better technology, catching and trading more tuna than countries operating a less technical operation. Many of the COMESA members operating in this fishery can be described as having a less technical operation. As a consequence, some COMESA countries operating within the same fishery have little or no exports reported in their trading books. This is despite tuna being among the leading tradable marine fish, representing 8% of the value of internationally traded fish products. This paper first reviews relevant literature relating to the tuna fishery within the WIO region. Next, the paper employs an augmented gravity model in an attempt to determine whether membership in COMESA is likely to imply more internal tuna trade. Data on the export of unprocessed tuna (fresh, chilled and frozen) from various data portals is used for this purpose. The study period considered stretches from 2001 to 2012 and examines exports from 19 countries operating in the WIO. Like the bulk of gravity models in trade literature, our approach employs a number of estimation approaches including the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Estimator as well as the usual OLS. Results show no evidence that COMESA membership means improvements in tuna exports. The analysis suggests several areas that COMESA may take to improve trade among members operating in the WIO tuna fishery. Among them include suggestions for increased investment from locals in the fishery. In addition, suggestions are provided on agreements between fisheries authorities and trade partners, recommendations which may strengthen the bargaining position of COMESA countries and introduce economically viable management decisions and consequently, better trade outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信