穿墙应用中喇叭天线和领结天线的比较

M. Pieraccini, L. Miccinesi, N. Rojhani
{"title":"穿墙应用中喇叭天线和领结天线的比较","authors":"M. Pieraccini, L. Miccinesi, N. Rojhani","doi":"10.1109/CAMA.2018.8530531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is a direct comparison between: 1) a double-ridged horn antenna; 2) the same doubleridged horn filled with sawdust; 3) a bow-tie antenna operating in (approximately) the same band (0.5 GHz 1.5 GHz). The three antennas have been simulated and experimentally tested. The best performances in terms of capability to detect a target behind a 40 cm wall have been obtained with the horn antenna filled with sawdust.","PeriodicalId":112989,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements & Applications (CAMA)","volume":"446 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Horn and Bow-tie Antennas for Through-the-Wall Applications\",\"authors\":\"M. Pieraccini, L. Miccinesi, N. Rojhani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CAMA.2018.8530531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is a direct comparison between: 1) a double-ridged horn antenna; 2) the same doubleridged horn filled with sawdust; 3) a bow-tie antenna operating in (approximately) the same band (0.5 GHz 1.5 GHz). The three antennas have been simulated and experimentally tested. The best performances in terms of capability to detect a target behind a 40 cm wall have been obtained with the horn antenna filled with sawdust.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements & Applications (CAMA)\",\"volume\":\"446 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements & Applications (CAMA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAMA.2018.8530531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Conference on Antenna Measurements & Applications (CAMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAMA.2018.8530531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文的目的是直接比较:1)双脊喇叭天线;2)同样的双棱角,里面装满了锯末;3)工作在(近似)同一频段(0.5 GHz - 1.5 GHz)的领结天线。对三种天线进行了仿真和实验测试。在探测40厘米墙后目标的能力方面,用填充木屑的喇叭天线获得了最佳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between Horn and Bow-tie Antennas for Through-the-Wall Applications
The aim of this paper is a direct comparison between: 1) a double-ridged horn antenna; 2) the same doubleridged horn filled with sawdust; 3) a bow-tie antenna operating in (approximately) the same band (0.5 GHz 1.5 GHz). The three antennas have been simulated and experimentally tested. The best performances in terms of capability to detect a target behind a 40 cm wall have been obtained with the horn antenna filled with sawdust.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信